Article published In:
Vol. 13:2 (2003) ► pp.211230
Abbott, Barbara
(1997) Definiteness and existentials. Language 731: 103-108. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John
(1971) The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C.L
(1995) Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 711: 63-101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, & Merrill F. Garrett
(eds.) (1996) Language and space. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
(1977) Meaning and form. London & New York: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Breivik, Leiv Egil
(1981) On the interpretation of existential there . Language 571: 1-25. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1990) Existential there: A synchronic and diachronic study. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
(1997a) There in space and time. In Heinrich Ramisch and Kenneth Wynne (eds.), Language in time and space: Studies in honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the occasion of his 60th birthday.Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 32-45.Google Scholar
(1997b) On the interrelation of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: A study of locative/temporal expressions in existential sentences in the LOB Corpus. In Udo Fries, Viviane Müller, & Peter Schneider (eds.), From Ælfric to the New York Times: Studies in English corpus linguistics. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 19.) Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 1-10.Google Scholar
(1999) On the pragmatic function of relative clauses and locative expressions in existential sentences in the LOB Corpus. In Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, 26.)Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 121-135.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dillon, George L., Linda Coleman, Jeanne Fahnestock, & Michael Agar
(1985) Review article on Brown & Yule (1983), Leech(1983), and Levinson (1983). Language 611: 446-460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Pamela, & Michael Noonan
(1995) Word order in discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle
(1999) Presentative constructions in English and Norwegian: A corpus-based contrastive study. Doctoral dissertation. (Acta Humaniora, 68.) Oslo: Department of British and American Studies, University of Oslo.
Erdmann, Peter
(1976) There sentences in English: A relational study based on a corpus of written texts. (Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaften, 6.) Munich: Tuduv.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
(1985) Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
(1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., & Sandra A. Thompson
(1990) A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 661: 297-316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William
(1992) Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L
(1995) Speech acts and conversational interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geisler, Christer
(1995) Relative infinitives in English. (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 91.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(1976) Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York & London: Academic Press, pp. 149-188.Google Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 11. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 21. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1994) Voice and inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K
(1998) Review of Downing & Noonan 1995. Language 741: 185-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, & Ron Zacharski
(1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 691: 274-307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannay, Michael
(1985) English existentials in functional grammar. (Functional Grammar Series, 3.) Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
(1997) Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 3.) Munich & Newcastle: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Sandra A. Thompson
(1980) Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561: 251- 299. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Huck, Geoffrey J., & Younghee Na
(1990) Extraposition and focus. Language 661: 51-77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, & Geoffrey K. Pullum
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Christine
(1995) The relativizers whose and of which in present-day English. (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia, 90.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É
(1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 741: 245-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
(1971) The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 333-378.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London & New York: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, Michael
(1988) Existential sentences: Their structure and meaning. London, New York, & Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
(1967) A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 31: 390–396.Google Scholar
(1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975) Deixis as the source of reference. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. London & New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1977) Semantics, vols. 1-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
McNally, Louise
(1997) A semantics for the English existential construction. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary Lee
(1974) Existential sentences in English. MIT dissertation. [Published in the series Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics, New York & London: Garland 1979.]
Prince, Ellen
(1981) Toward a typology of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-255.Google Scholar
(1988) The discourse functions of Yiddish expletive + subject-postposing. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 21: 176-194.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 295-325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Garachana Camarero, Mar & Axel Hernández Díaz
2020. From semantics to grammar. In Changes in Meaning and Function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25],  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.