Article published In:
Relationality: Discursive constructions of Asian Pacific American identities
Edited by Adrienne Lo and Angela Reyes
[Pragmatics 14:2/3] 2004
► pp. 235256
References
Abelmann, Nancy
(2003) The melodrama of mobility : Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif
(2004) Epistemic stance. Ms.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
(2003) Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 131-164. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
(1971) Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek.Google Scholar
Cha, Jae-Ho
(1994) Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Çigdem. Kagitçibasi, Sang Chin Choi and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 157-174.Google Scholar
Choi, Soonja
(1991) Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language 111: 93-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, Wilhem J
(2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 79-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dredge, C. Paul
(1983) What is politeness in Korean speech? Korean Linguistics 31: 21-32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A
(2001) Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11.2: 167-192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F
(1990) Referential practice : Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Diane M
(1999) Lanterns on the river: Essays on life and culture in contemporary South Korea. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio
(1995) Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 24.3: 235-264. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ki-Hong
(1978) Cultural and linguistic variables in the language of emotion of Americans and Koreans. In Chin-u Kim, Samuel Elmo Martin, Ho-min Sohn and Seok C. Song (eds.), Papers in Korean linguistics. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, pp. 259-267.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y
(1973) Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from the Japanese. In Paul Kiparsky and Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 377-391.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
(1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 109-150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang
(1993) Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4.2: 135-167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
(1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley, pp. 101-124.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo, Yang Ha Lee, and Sung-Un Chang
(1967) A Korean-English dictionary. New Haven. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K
(1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
McLendon, Sally
(2003) Evidentials in eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 101-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
(2001) Evidentiality and epistemological stance: Narrative retelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Park, Mae-Ran
(1990) Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 111-128.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
(2004) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Manuscript.
Scheibman, Joanne
Silverstein, Michael
(1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-56.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
(1986a) Strategies of indirection in Korean. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 266-279Google Scholar
(1986b) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 389-410.Google Scholar
(1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock S., and Mee-Jeong Park
(2003) Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. In Patricia Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105-118.Google Scholar
Suh, Cheong-Soo
(1996) Kwuke mwunpep (Korean grammar). Seoul: Hanyang University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko
(1998) Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 29.4: 429-462. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yum, June O
(1987) Korean philosophy and communication. In D. Lawrence Kincaid (eds.), Communication theory : Eastern and western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 71-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yum, Young-Ok, and Daniel J. Canary
(2003) Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. In Daniel J. Canary and Marianne Dainton (eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 277-296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Cekaite, Asta
2012. Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in a Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society 41:5  pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Cekaite, Asta
2020. Triadic conflict mediation as socialization into perspective taking in Swedish preschools. Linguistics and Education 59  pp. 100753 ff. DOI logo
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
2011. Language Socialization and Stance‐Taking Practices. In The Handbook of Language Socialization,  pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Fukuda, Chie
2022. Resistance against being formulated as cultural other. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2008. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education,  pp. 2766 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2010. The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2011. Heritage Language Socialization. In The Handbook of Language Socialization,  pp. 587 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2015. Literacy, Creativity, and Continuity. In The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction,  pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2017. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Language Socialization,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2017. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Language Socialization,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
He, Agnes Weiyun
2021. A Narrative-Ethnographic Approach to Research on Heritage Language Development. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Jin Sook & Wayne E. Wright
2014. The Rediscovery of Heritage and Community Language Education in the United States. Review of Research in Education 38:1  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Li, Duanduan
2012. Pragmatic Socialization. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Macias, Heather
2023. Language as a marker of cultural identity and commodification: The language socialization practices of multilingual, Latina/Mexican American mothers. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 20:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Rymes, Betsy
2008. Language Socialization and the Linguistic Anthropology Of Education. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education,  pp. 2607 ff. DOI logo
Song, Juyoung
2017. Language Socialization in Korean Transnational Communities. In Language Socialization,  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Song, Juyoung
2017. Language Socialization in Korean Transnational Communities. In Language Socialization,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Suh, Sora
2020. An examination of the language socialization practices of three Korean American families through honorifics. Bilingual Research Journal 43:1  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Woolard, Kathryn A.
2008. Whydatnow?: Linguistic‐anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4  pp. 432 ff. DOI logo
Wortham, Stanton
2008. Linguistic Anthropology of Education. Annual Review of Anthropology 37:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Wortham, Stanton & Angela Reyes
2011. Linguistic Anthropology of Education. In A Companion to the Anthropology of Education,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Xiao-Desai, Yang & Ka F. Wong
2017. Epistemic stance in Chinese heritage language writing – A developmental view. Chinese as a Second Language Research 6:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.