Previous work on Korean grammar has claimed that one person can not have access to another person’s thoughts, feelings or sensations, as indicated by the use of evidential markers. By looking at cases in which a teacher at a Korean heritage language school claims to read her students’ minds with a high degree of certainty, I demonstrate how expressions of epistemic stance relate to moral evaluation. Speakers portray their access to the thoughts and sensations of individuals who they deem morally worthy as more distant and uncertain. When individuals are evaluated as morally suspect, however, speakers represent these persons’ emotions, thoughts and sensations as self-evident displays of affect. This paper thus argues that evidential marking in Korean interaction is a social act through which interlocutors morally evaluate others.
Abelmann, Nancy (2003) The melodrama of mobility : Women, talk, and class in contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Agha, Asif (2004) Epistemic stance. Ms.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2003) Evidentiality in Tariana. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 131-164. BoP
Benveniste, Emile (1971) Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek.
Cha, Jae-Ho (1994) Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Çigdem. Kagitçibasi, Sang Chin Choi and Gene Yoon (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 157-174.
Choi, Soonja (1991) Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: A study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language 111: 93-119.
de Reuse, Wilhem J. (2003) Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 79-100.
Fox, Barbara A. (2001) Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11.2: 167-192.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. BoP
Hanks, William F. (1990) Referential practice : Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoffman, Diane M. (1999) Lanterns on the river: Essays on life and culture in contemporary South Korea. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Kim, Ki-Hong (1978) Cultural and linguistic variables in the language of emotion of Americans and Koreans. In Chin-u Kim, Samuel Elmo Martin, Ho-min Sohn and Seok C. Song (eds.), Papers in Korean linguistics. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, pp. 259-267.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1973) Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from the Japanese. In Paul Kiparsky and Stephen R. Anderson (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, pp. 377-391.
Lee, Hyo Sang (1993) Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4.2: 135-167.
Lyons, John (1982) Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley, pp. 101-124.
Martin, Samuel Elmo, Yang Ha Lee, and Sung-Un Chang (1967) A Korean-English dictionary. New Haven. Yale University Press.
Park, Mae-Ran (1990) Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 111-128.
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage (2004) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Manuscript.
Silverstein, Michael (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-56.
Sohn, Ho-Min (1986a) Strategies of indirection in Korean. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 266-279
Sohn, Ho-Min (1986b) Power and solidarity in the Korean language. In Linguistic expeditions. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 389-410.
Sohn, Ho-Min (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sohn, Sung-Ock S., and Mee-Jeong Park (2003) Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. In Patricia Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105-118.
Suzuki, Satoko (1998) Tte and nante: Markers of psychological distance in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 29.4: 429-462. BoP
Yum, June O. (1987) Korean philosophy and communication. In D. Lawrence Kincaid (eds.), Communication theory : Eastern and western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 71-86.
Yum, Young-Ok, and Daniel J. Canary (2003) Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors. In Daniel J. Canary and Marianne Dainton (eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 277-296.
Cited by (23)
Cited by 23 other publications
Song, David Shuang
2024. Community-based and formal Chinese language education in urban California, 50 years after Lau v. Nichols. Language Policy
Macias, Heather
2023. Language as a marker of cultural identity and commodification: The language socialization practices of multilingual, Latina/Mexican American mothers. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 20:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
2020. An examination of the language socialization practices of three Korean American families through honorifics. Bilingual Research Journal 43:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
Song, Juyoung
2017. Language Socialization in Korean Transnational Communities. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 339 ff.
Song, Juyoung
2017. Language Socialization in Korean Transnational Communities. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 1 ff.
Xiao-Desai, Yang & Ka F. Wong
2017. Epistemic stance in Chinese heritage language writing – A developmental view. Chinese as a Second Language Research 6:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Cekaite, Asta
2012. Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in a Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society 41:5 ► pp. 641 ff.
Cekaite, Asta
2020. Triadic conflict mediation as socialization into perspective taking in Swedish preschools. Linguistics and Education 59 ► pp. 100753 ff.
Li, Duanduan
2012. Pragmatic Socialization. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
2011. Language Socialization and Stance‐Taking Practices. In The Handbook of Language Socialization, ► pp. 296 ff.
Wortham, Stanton & Angela Reyes
2011. Linguistic Anthropology of Education. In A Companion to the Anthropology of Education, ► pp. 135 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2008. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 2766 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2010. The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30 ► pp. 66 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2011. Heritage Language Socialization. In The Handbook of Language Socialization, ► pp. 587 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2015. Literacy, Creativity, and Continuity. In The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction, ► pp. 304 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2017. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 183 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2017. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 1 ff.
He, Agnes Weiyun
2021. A Narrative-Ethnographic Approach to Research on Heritage Language Development. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 499 ff.
Rymes, Betsy
2008. Language Socialization and the Linguistic Anthropology Of Education. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ► pp. 2607 ff.
Woolard, Kathryn A.
2008. Whydatnow?: Linguistic‐anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4 ► pp. 432 ff.
Wortham, Stanton
2008. Linguistic Anthropology of Education. Annual Review of Anthropology 37:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.