Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 16:4 (2006) ► pp.513–533
Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English
Fifty-nine Japanese college students of English at two different proficiency levels were evaluated for their ability to produce a speech act of request in a spoken role play task. Learners’ production was analyzed quantitatively by rating performance on a six-point scale for overall appropriateness, as well as qualitatively by identifying the directness levels of the linguistic expressions used to produce requests. Results revealed a significant L2 proficiency influence on overall appropriateness, but only a marginal difference in the types of linguistic expressions used between the two proficiency groups. Moreover, grammatical and discourse control encoded in the rating scale seemed to have affected the quality of speech acts.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
ACTFL
(1986) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. In H. Byrnes & M. Canale (eds.), Defining and developing proficiency: Guidelines, implementations, and Concepts. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Bachman, L
Bachman, L., and A. Palmer
(1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K
(1999) Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning 491: 677-713. 
Bardovi-Harlig, K., and B. Hartford
(1991) Saying "No": Native and nonnative rejections in English. In L.F. Bouton, & Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (vol.21). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language, pp. 41-57.
(1993a) Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 151: 279-304.
(1993b) Refining the DCT: Comparing open questionnaires and dialogue completion tasks. In L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (vol.4). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language, pp. 143-165.
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper
Brown, J.D
(2001) Pragmatics tests: Different purposes, different tests. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 301-326.
Brown, P., and S. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256-289.
Canale, M., and M. Swain
(1980) Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 11: 1-47.
Cohen, A
(1994) Assessing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, MS: Newbury House.
Cohen, A., and E. Olshtain
(1993) The production of speech acts by ESL learners. TESOL Quarterly 271: 33-56.
DuFon, M.A
(2001) Triangulation in qualitative SLA research on interlanguage pragmatics. In S. Bonch- Bruevich, W. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (eds.), The past, present, and future of second language research: Selected proceedings of the 2000 second language research forum.Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 251-270.
Eisenstein, M., and J. Bodman
(1993) Expressing gratitude in American English. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43-57.
Felix-Brasdefer, J.C
(2003) Declining an invitation: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies in American English and Latin American Spanish. Multilingua 221: 225-255.
Gass, S.M., and N. Houck
Hartford, B.S, and K. Bardovi-Harlig
(1992) Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. In L.F. Bouton (ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (vol.31). University of Illlinois, Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language, pp. 33-52.
Hill, T
(1997) The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tokyo: Temple University-Japan.
Hoffman-Hicks, S
(1992) Linguistic and pragmatic competence: Their relationship in the overall competence of the language learner. In L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning monograph series vol.3.Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, pp. 66-80.
Hudson, T., E. Detmer, and J.D. Brown
(1995) Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report No.7). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
John, J
(1992) The Ontario test of ESL oral interaction test. System 201: 305-316.
Kasper, G., and E. Kellerman
Maeshiba, N., G. Kasper, and S. Ross
(1996) Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing. In S. Gass & J. Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 155-187. BoP
North, B
(1995) The development of a common framework scale of descriptors of language proficiency based on a theory of measurement. System 231: 445-465.
(2000) The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.
Psathas, G
(1994) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage Publications.
Roever, C
(2005) Testing ESL pragmatics. Frankfurt: Gunter Narr.
Rose, K.R
(2000) An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 221: 27-67.
Sasaki, M
(1998) Investigating EFL students' production of speech acts: A comparison of production questionnaires and role plays. Journal of Pragmatics 301: 457-484. BoP
BoPTakahashi, S
(1996) Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 181: 189-223.
Thomas, J
Trosborg, A
(1995) Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. BoP
BoPWesche, M.B
(1987) Second language performance testing: The Ontario test of ESL as an example. Language Testing 41: 28-47.
Yamashita, S
(1996) Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report No. 14). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
Cited by
Cited by 45 other publications
Ahmadi, Hossein & Farid Ghaemi
2017. Effects of Task Repetition and EFL Proficiency on English Speech Act Production. SSRN Electronic Journal 
Hossein Ahmadi, Farid Ghaemi & Parviz Birjandi
2016. The Effect of Output-based Task Repetition on EFL Learners’ Speech Act Production . Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Al-Gahtani, Saad & Carsten Roever
2012. Proficiency and Sequential Organization of L2 Requests. Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 42 ff.
Boone, Griet, Nicolas Ruytenbeek & Sofie Decock
2022. “The message is clear”: An L1 business perspective on non-target-like formulaic expressions in L2 German. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:5 ► pp. 571 ff.
Cunningham, D. Joseph
2017. Second language pragmatic appropriateness in telecollaboration: The influence of discourse management and grammaticality. System 64 ► pp. 46 ff.
Efeoglu Senturk, Gulumser
2017. The effect of L2 English proficiency on request, advice and apology of L1 Turkish-L2 English learners. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3:1 ► pp. 297 ff.
Gesuato, Sara & Erik Castello
2020. Assessing pragmatic aspects of L2 communication: Why, how and what for. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gesuato, Sara & Victoriya Trubnikova
2022. Assessing Pragmatic Skills in Speech Act Production and Perception. In Handbook of Research on Policies and Practices for Assessing Inclusive Teaching and Learning [Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership, ], ► pp. 211 ff.
Halenko, Nicola & Christian Jones
2017. Explicit instruction of spoken requests: An examination of pre-departure instruction and the study abroad environment. System 68 ► pp. 26 ff.
Heidari, Afroozeh, Hossein Heidari Tabrizi, Azizeh Chalak & Jeroen van de Weijer
2020. Using short stories vs. video clips to improve upper intermediate EFL students’ sociopragmatic knowledge: Speech acts in focus. Cogent Arts & Humanities 7:1 ► pp. 1778977 ff.
Hernández, Todd A. & Paulo Boero
2018. Explicit instruction for request strategy development during short-term study abroad. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 5:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Ho, Debbie G.E., Alex Henry & Sharifah N.H. Alkaff
2022. “You don’t seem to know how to work”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 391 ff.
Hosseini, Mohammad Baqerzadeh, Hossein Pourghasemian & Xiaofei Lu
2019. Comparing the effects of explicit and implicit teaching using literary and nonliterary materials on learner’s pragmatic comprehension and production. Cogent Education 6:1 ► pp. 1662979 ff.
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics,
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Zhuo Bi
2021. Altered speech act indication: A problem for foreign language learners?. System 101 ► pp. 102554 ff.
Khorshidi, Sepideh, Fariba Mobini & Mahdi Nasiri
2016. Iranian English Teaching Applicants' Request and Apology Speech Acts: Special Focus on Language Proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 7:3 ► pp. 534 ff.
Kostromitina, Maria
2024. An exploratory study of intonational variation in L1 and L2 English speakers’ pragmatic production of high imposition
requests and refusals. Applied Pragmatics 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kostromitina, Maria & Yongzhi Miao
2024. Listener perception of appropriateness of L1 and L2 refusals in English. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
Krulatz, Anna
2019. Understanding Language in Context. In Applied Linguistics for Teachers of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 205 ff.
Kumar, Siva M. & K. R. Jayasimha
2019. Brand verbs: brand synonymity and brand leadership. Journal of Brand Management 26:2 ► pp. 110 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Conventionalization and Conventions. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 162 ff.
Levkina, Mayya
2018. Chapter 6. Developing pragmatic competence through tasks in EFL contexts. In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 138 ff.
Li, Shuai
2014. The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System 45 ► pp. 103 ff.
Li, Shuai, Xiaofei Tang, Naoko Taguchi & Feng Xiao
2022. Effects of linguistic proficiency on speech act development in L2 Chinese during study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
Liontas, John I. & Matthew Siegel
2019. Cultural Perspectives in Teaching Speaking. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff.
Loewen, Shawn & Hayo Reinders
2011. The Key Concepts. In Key Concepts in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Morrison, Astrid & Parvaneh Tavakoli
2023. Task communicative function and oral fluency of L1 and L2 speakers. The Modern Language Journal 107:4 ► pp. 896 ff.
Najafabadi, Shahla Amooaliakbari & Shamala Paramasivam
2012. Iranian EFL Learners’ Interlanguage Request Modifications: Use of External and Internal Supportive Moves. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2:7
Mojgan Rashtchi, Reza Porkar & SeyyedeFateme Ghazi MirSaeed
2020. Jigsaw and Dictogloss Tasks: Do They Facilitate the Development of Speech Acts?. International Journal of Research in English Education 5:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Siegel, Joseph & James Broadbridge
2018. Message sent. Message-received? Teachers and target community members decide. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Sládková, Věra & Marie Lahodová Vališová
2022. Request strategies and modification devices as performed by Czech EFL learners: A focus on borrowing objects. Discourse and Interaction 15:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Stavans, Anat & Ronit Webman Shafran
2018. The pragmatics of requests and refusals in multilingual settings. International Journal of Multilingualism 15:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
TAGUCHI, NAOKO
2011. Pragmatic Development as a Dynamic, Complex Process: General Patterns and Case Histories. The Modern Language Journal 95:4 ► pp. 605 ff.
Taguchi, Naoko
2011. Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49:4
Taguchi, Naoko
2018. Advanced Second Language Pragmatic Competence. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 505 ff.
Taguchi, Naoko
2022. Rater variation in the assessment of speech acts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 453 ff.
Tajeddin, Zia & Amir Zand Moghadam
2012. Interlanguage Pragmatic Motivation: Its Construct and Impact on Speech Act Production. RELC Journal 43:3 ► pp. 353 ff.
Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika & Judit Dombi
2020. Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
TOPRAK, Tuğba Elif
2020. A Study on the Use of Suggestion Strategies among Turkish EFL Learners. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 11:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Webman Shafran, Ronit
2019. Level of directness and the use of please in requests in English by native speakers of Arabic and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 148 ► pp. 1 ff.
Xiao, Feng
2017. Development in the use of Chinese mitigation in interaction. Chinese as a Second Language Research 6:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Yousefi, Marziyeh & Hossein Nassaji
2019. A meta-analysis of the effects of instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pragmatics and the role of moderator variables. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Zand-Moghadam, Amir & Aylar Adeh
2020. Investigating Pragmatic Competence, Metapragmatic Awareness and Speech Act Strategies among Turkmen-Persian Bilingual and Persian Monolingual EFL Learners: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 49:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
정보현 & 민수정
2014. Language Learning Motivation and Its Impact on Speech Act of Refusal. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.