Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 28:3 (2018) ► pp. 391416

Full-text

The motives attributed to trolls in metapragmatic comments on three Hungarian left-wing political blogs
References

References

Anthony, Laurence
2016AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://​www​.laurenceanthony​.net/
Baker, Paul
2001 “Moral Panic and Alternative Identity Construction in Usenet.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication (7) 1.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Balconi, Michaela
2010 “Intentions and Communication: Cognitive Strategies, Metacognition and Social Cognition.” In Neuropsychology of Communication, ed. by Michaela Balconi, 159–176. London/New York: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binns, Amy
2012 “Don’t Feed the Trolls! Managing Troublemakers in Magazines’ Online Communities.” Journalism Practice 6 (4): 547–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery, and Stephen Wattam
2015 “Collocations in Context: A New Perspective on Collocation Networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buckels, Erin E., Paul D. Trapnell, and Delroy L. Paulhus
2014 “Trolls Just Want to Have Fun.” Personality and Individual Differences 35 (67): 97–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Justin et al.
2015 “Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities.” Proceedings of ICWSM 2015. http://​arxiv​.org​/abs​/1504​.00680 (Date of access: 25 February 2017)
Cienki, Alan
2007 “Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 170–187. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Claire Hardaker
2016 “Pragmatics.” In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus-linguistic Research, ed. by Paul Baker, and Jesse Egbert, 124–137. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donath, Judith S.
1999 “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community.” In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. by Peter Kollock, and Marc A. Smith, 27–58. London/New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Fichman, Pnina, and Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo
2015 “The Bad Boys and Girls of Cyberspace: How Gender and Context Impact Perception of and Reaction to Trolling.” Social Science Computer Review 33 (2): 163–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galán-García, Patxi et al.
2014 “Supervised Machine Learning for the Detection of Troll Profiles in Twitter Social Network: Application to a Real Case of Cyberbullying.” In Proceedings of International Joint Conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13, ed. by Álvaro Herrero et al., 419–428. New York: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Scott A., and Judith S. Donath
2004 “Social Roles in Electronic Communities.” Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Conference Internet Research 5.0, 19–22 September 2004. Brighton, England. 1–25.
Greaves, Chris, and Martin Warren
2010 “What Can a Corpus Tell Us about Multi-word Units?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Anne O’Keeffe, and Michael McCarthy, 212–226. London/New York: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6 (2): 215–242.Google Scholar
2013 ““Uh….not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”. An Overview of Trolling Strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1): 58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “ ‘I refuse to respond to this obvious troll’: An Overview of Responses to (Perceived) Trolling.” Corpora 10 (2): 201–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt
2012 “Speaker Intentions and Intentionality.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. et al.
2002 “Searching for Safety Online: Managing „Trolling” in a Feminist Forum.” The Information Society 18 (5): 371–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
(eds) 2013Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopkinson, Christopher
2013 “Trolling in Online Discussions: From Provocation to Community-building.” Brno Studies in English 39 (1): 5–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel
2011 “Metapragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 107–136. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Richard
2014Social Identity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langlotz, Andreas
2010 “Social Cognition.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 167–204. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lockard, Matthew
2014 “Implication and Reasoning in Mental State Attribution: Comments on Jane Heal’s Theory of Co-cognition.” Philosophical Psychology 27 (5): 719–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCosker, Anthony
2014 “Trolling as Provocation: YouTube’s Agonistic Publics.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20 (2): 201–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morrissey, Lochlan
2010 “Trolling Is an Art: Towards a Schematic Classification of Intention in Internet Trolling.” Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communications 3 (2): 75–82.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira
2010 “Inferential Comprehension.” In The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia, ed. by Louise Cummings, 220–222. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, Javier F. et al.
2012 “Propagation of Trust and Distrust for the Detection of Trolls in a Social Network.” Computer Networks 56 (12): 2884–2895.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özsoy, Duygu
2015 “Tweeting Political Fear: Trolls in Turkey.” Journal of History School 8 (22): 535–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petykó, Márton
2013 “Az internetes troll mint identitás kialakítása politikai blogok diskurzusaiban [Construction of internet troll as an identity in the discourses of political blogs].” Magyar Nyelvőr 133 (3): 274–313.Google Scholar
Postmes, Tom, Russel Spears, and Martin Lea
2000 “The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Human Communication Research 26 (3): 341–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shachaf, Pnina, and Noriko Hara
2010 “Beyond Vandalism: Wikipedia Trolls.” Journal of Information Science 36 (3): 357–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2007 “Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interactions”. In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Axel Hübler, and Wolfram Bublitz, 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, Scott, and Mark D. Griffiths
2012 “An Exploratory Study of Trolling in Online Video Gaming.” International Journal of Cyber Behaviour, Psychology and Learning 2 (4): 17–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael et al.
2005 “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 675–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Utz, Sonja
2005 “Types of Deception and Underlying Motivation. What People Think.” Social Science Computer Review 23 (1): 49–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use.” Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Rex A.
2016 “Motivation Theory Essentials: Understanding Motives and Their Conversion into Effortful Goal Pursuit.” Motivation and Emotion 40 (1): 16–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Deschrijver, Cedric
2021. On the metapragmatics of ‘conspiracy theory’: Scepticism and epistemological debates in online conspiracy comments. Journal of Pragmatics 182  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo
Jenks, Christopher J.
2019. Talking trolls into existence: On the floor management of trolling in online forums. Journal of Pragmatics 143  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Sambaraju, Rahul & Chris McVittie
2020. Examining abuse in online media. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14:3 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.