Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 28:3 (2018) ► pp.391–416
The motives attributed to trolls in metapragmatic comments on three Hungarian left-wing political blogs
This paper investigates the linguistically marked motives that participants attribute to those they call trolls in 178 comment threads of three Hungarian left-wing political blogs. It is also concerned with how frequently these motives are mentioned and how they contribute to the discursive construction of trolling and trolls. Another goal of the paper is to examine whether the mainly emotional motives ascribed to trolls in the academic literature correspond with those that the participants attribute to the alleged trolls in the threads. The paper identifies five motives for trolling: emotional reasons, financial gain, political beliefs, being employed by Fidesz or the Hungarian government, and unspecified political affiliation. Depending on these motives, trolling and trolls are constructed in various ways. Furthermore, by suggesting that Fidesz or the Hungarian government employs trolls, the posters discursively construct Fidesz as an autocratic and corrupt state party that tries to manipulate the public.
Keywords: trolling, computer-mediated communication, blog, Hungarian, politics, motivation, mental state attribution, metapragmatic comment
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Trolling in computer-mediated communication
- 3.‘Trolling’ and ‘troll’ as metapragmatic labels
- 4.Data and method
- 4.1Data collection
- 4.2Corpus and data analysis
- 5.A taxonomy of the motives attributed to trolls
- 5.1Assumed motive for trolling (1): Emotional reasons
- 5.2Assumed motive for trolling (2): Financial gain
- 5.3Assumed motive for trolling (3): Political beliefs
- 5.4Assumed motive for trolling (4): Being employed by Fidesz or the government
- 5.5Assumed motive for trolling (5): Unspecified political affiliation
- 6.Annotation of the troll motive comments
- 7.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Anthony, Laurence
2016 AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Baker, Paul
2001 “Moral Panic and Alternative Identity Construction in Usenet.” Journal of Computer-mediated Communication (7) 1. 
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Balconi, Michaela
2010 “Intentions and Communication: Cognitive Strategies, Metacognition and Social Cognition.” In Neuropsychology of Communication, ed. by Michaela Balconi, 159–176. London/New York: Springer.
Binns, Amy
2012 “Don’t Feed the Trolls! Managing Troublemakers in Magazines’ Online Communities.” Journalism Practice 6 (4): 547–562.
Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery, and Stephen Wattam
2015 “Collocations in Context: A New Perspective on Collocation Networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139–173.
Buckels, Erin E., Paul D. Trapnell, and Delroy L. Paulhus
2014 “Trolls Just Want to Have Fun.” Personality and Individual Differences 35 (67): 97–102.
Cheng, Justin et al.
2015 “Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities.” Proceedings of ICWSM 2015. [URL] (Date of access: 25 February 2017)
Cienki, Alan
2007 “Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 170–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Claire Hardaker
2016 “Pragmatics.” In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus-linguistic Research, ed. by Paul Baker, and Jesse Egbert, 124–137. New York/London: Routledge.
Donath, Judith S.
1999 “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community.” In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. by Peter Kollock, and Marc A. Smith, 27–58. London/New York: Routledge
Fichman, Pnina, and Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo
2015 “The Bad Boys and Girls of Cyberspace: How Gender and Context Impact Perception of and Reaction to Trolling.” Social Science Computer Review 33 (2): 163–180.
Galán-García, Patxi et al.
2014 “Supervised Machine Learning for the Detection of Troll Profiles in Twitter Social Network: Application to a Real Case of Cyberbullying.” In Proceedings of International Joint Conference SOCO’13-CISIS’13-ICEUTE’13, ed. by Álvaro Herrero et al., 419–428. New York: Springer.
Golder, Scott A., and Judith S. Donath
2004 “Social Roles in Electronic Communities.” Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Conference Internet Research 5.0, 19–22 September 2004. Brighton, England. 1–25.
Greaves, Chris, and Martin Warren
2010 “What Can a Corpus Tell Us about Multi-word Units?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Anne O’Keeffe, and Michael McCarthy, 212–226. London/New York: Routledge.
Hardaker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6 (2): 215–242.
2013 ““Uh….not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”. An Overview of Trolling Strategies.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1): 58–86.
2015 “ ‘I refuse to respond to this obvious troll’: An Overview of Responses to (Perceived) Trolling.” Corpora 10 (2): 201–229.
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt
2012 “Speaker Intentions and Intentionality.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, Susan C. et al.
2002 “Searching for Safety Online: Managing „Trolling” in a Feminist Forum.” The Information Society 18 (5): 371–384.
Herring, Susan C., Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
(eds) 2013 Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Hopkinson, Christopher
2013 “Trolling in Online Discussions: From Provocation to Community-building.” Brno Studies in English 39 (1): 5–25.
Hübler, Axel
2011 “Metapragmatics.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 107–136. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jenkins, Richard
2014 Social Identity. London/New York: Routledge.
Langlotz, Andreas
2010 “Social Cognition.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 167–204. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lockard, Matthew
2014 “Implication and Reasoning in Mental State Attribution: Comments on Jane Heal’s Theory of Co-cognition.” Philosophical Psychology 27 (5): 719–734.
McCosker, Anthony
2014 “Trolling as Provocation: YouTube’s Agonistic Publics.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20 (2): 201–217.
Morrissey, Lochlan
2010 “Trolling Is an Art: Towards a Schematic Classification of Intention in Internet Trolling.” Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communications 3 (2): 75–82.
Noveck, Ira
2010 “Inferential Comprehension.” In The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia, ed. by Louise Cummings, 220–222. London/New York: Routledge.
Ortega, Javier F. et al.
2012 “Propagation of Trust and Distrust for the Detection of Trolls in a Social Network.” Computer Networks 56 (12): 2884–2895.
Özsoy, Duygu
2015 “Tweeting Political Fear: Trolls in Turkey.” Journal of History School 8 (22): 535–552.
Petykó, Márton
2013 “Az internetes troll mint identitás kialakítása politikai blogok diskurzusaiban [Construction of internet troll as an identity in the discourses of political blogs].” Magyar Nyelvőr 133 (3): 274–313.
Postmes, Tom, Russel Spears, and Martin Lea
2000 “The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Human Communication Research 26 (3): 341–371.
Shachaf, Pnina, and Noriko Hara
2010 “Beyond Vandalism: Wikipedia Trolls.” Journal of Information Science 36 (3): 357–370.
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2007 “Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interactions”. In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Axel Hübler, and Wolfram Bublitz, 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thacker, Scott, and Mark D. Griffiths
2012 “An Exploratory Study of Trolling in Online Video Gaming.” International Journal of Cyber Behaviour, Psychology and Learning 2 (4): 17–33.
Tomasello, Michael et al.
2005 “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 675–691.
Utz, Sonja
2005 “Types of Deception and Underlying Motivation. What People Think.” Social Science Computer Review 23 (1): 49–56.
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wright, Rex A.
2016 “Motivation Theory Essentials: Understanding Motives and Their Conversion into Effortful Goal Pursuit.” Motivation and Emotion 40 (1): 16–21.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Deschrijver, Cedric
2021. On the metapragmatics of ‘conspiracy theory’: Scepticism and epistemological debates in online conspiracy comments. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 310 ff. 
Jenks, Christopher J.
2019. Talking trolls into existence: On the floor management of trolling in online forums. Journal of Pragmatics 143 ► pp. 54 ff.
Pisarski, Mariusz & Aleksandra Gralczyk
2021. From Disruption to Dialog: Days of Judaism on Polish Twitter. Religions 12:10 ► pp. 828 ff.
Sambaraju, Rahul & Chris McVittie
2020. Examining abuse in online media. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14:3
Verschueren, Jef
2021. Reflexivity and Meta-awareness. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.