Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 29:3 (2019) ► pp.384–409

Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions

The role of remedial accounts

ORCID logo | Ulster University
| The University of Queensland
| York St John University
Much of the research on affiliation to date has focused on how people do (dis)affiliation. This paper explores the remedial work that follows instances of disaffiliation between interactants who are getting acquainted. Building on an interactional pragmatics analytical approach informed by methods and research in conversation analysis, findings indicate that extended remedial accounts recurrently follow moments of disaffiliation in initial interactions. These remedial accounts enable participants to reposition a prior disaffiliative stance as (ostensibly) affiliative. It appears in initial interactions, then, that remedial accounts play an important role in modulating troubles in affiliating. We propose that the considerable interactional work undertaken by these participants to modulate such troubles reflects a general preference for agreeability in initial interactions, at least amongst (Australian and British) speakers of English.
Keywords: getting acquainted, disaffiliation, accounts, facework, conversation analysis, interactional pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Initial interactions
    • 2.2(Dis)Affiliation
      • 2.2.1Affiliation, agreement and alignment
      • 2.2.2Disaffiliation and nonaffiliation
    • 2.3Accounts and remedial work
    • 2.4Accounts and dispreferred responses
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Analytical framework
  • 4.Remedial accounts in initial interactions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 26 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17010.fli
References (78)
References
Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and Arguing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Affiliative and Disaffiliative Candidate Understandings.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 531–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte. 2011. “Proposing Shared Knowledge as a Means of Pursuing Agreement.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 207–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buttny, Richard. 1993. Social Accountability in Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1992. “Caveat Orator: Audience Disaffiliation in the 1988 Presidential Debates.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 78 (1): 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. “Don’t Make Me Laugh: Responsive Laughter in (Dis)Affiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 1001: 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., John Local, and Gareth Walker. 2006. “Repetition and the Prosody – Pragmatics Interface.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1721–1751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text & Talk 32 (4): 433–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen. 1992. “The Interactive Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse.” Discourse Processes 15 (2): 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flint, Natalie. 2016. “That’s What I Thought as Well”: Doing Affiliation in Initial Interactions. Unpublished BA dissertation. York St John University.Google Scholar
. 2018. Accounting for Disaffiliations: Remedying (Dis)Affiliations in Initial Interactions between American and British Speakers of English. Unpublished MA dissertation. York St John University.Google Scholar
Flint, Natalie, and Andrew John Merrison. Under review. “On the Collaborative Nature of Accounting: Remedying Potentially Divisive and/or Delicate Topics in Intercultural Initial Interactions.”
Goffman, Erving. 1971. “Remedial Interchanges.” In Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, 95–187. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2011. “Humour, Face and Im/politeness in Getting Acquainted.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh and Andrew John Merrison, 165–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Conversational Interaction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 86 (1): 36–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. “Mockery and (Non-)Seriousness in Initial Interactions Amongst American and Australian Speakers of English.” In Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. by Donal Carbaugh, 104–117. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Jocular Language Play, Social Action and (Dis)Affiliation in Conversational Interaction.” In Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, ed. by Nancy Bell, 143–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh. 2015. “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions Amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua 34 (4): 461–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore. 2018. “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy in Initial Interactions.” Discourse Studies 31 (2): 246–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2013. “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 167–190. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” In Analyzing Lay Explanation: A Case Book of Methods, ed. by Charles Antaki, 127–144. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 2012. “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 430–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2015. “Collaboratively Organized Stancetaking in Japanese: Sharing and Negotiating Stance within the Turn Constructional Unit.” Journal of Pragmatics 831: 104–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “List Construction as a Task and Resource”, In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Washington DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Joyce, Jack. 2015. A Partial Sketch of Membership Categorisation Devices in Initial Interactions. Unpublished BA dissertation. York St John University.Google Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10): 1447–1471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. “The Terms of Not Knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20 (3): 441–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “Assisted Storytelling: Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter.” Qualitative Sociology 15 (3): 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. “Responsive List Construction: A Conversational Resource for Accomplishing Multifaceted Social Action.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (1): 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “Finding “Face” in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (4): 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Construction and Social Action.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2013. “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Don H. Zimmerman. 1984. “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly 47 (4): 301–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Margaret L., Michael J. Cody, and Nancy E. Rosenstein. 1983. “Account Sequences in Conversations between Strangers.” Communication Monographs 50 (2): 102–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh. 2015. “Agency, Accountability and Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 207–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence. 1990. “Reconceptualizing Social Accounts: An Agenda for Theory Building and Empirical Research.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 101: 113–144.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, 407–438. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2010. “Making Way and Making Sense: Including Newcomers in Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73 (2): 152–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Doing Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication Monographs 78 (1): 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1975. Second Assessments: A Study of Some Features of Agreements/Disagreements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. (2013) “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988. “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wooton. 89–135. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. 1988. Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Google Scholar
Schönbach, Peter. 1990. Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semin, Gün R., and Antony S. R. Manstead. 1983. The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “An Overview of the Question–Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2010. ““Have You been Married, Or…?”: Eliciting and Accounting for Relationship Histories in Speed-Dating Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (3): 260–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 1999. Getting Acquainted in Conversation: A Study of Initial Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Direct and Indirect Self-Presentation in First Conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33 (3): 302–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Chalfoun, Andrew
2024. Shifting responsibility onto coparticipants: Disaffiliative accounts in request sequences. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2023. Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 575 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Mei, Fred Dervin, Yuyin Liang & Heidi Layne
2023. “Just Take Your Time and Talk to us, Okay?”– International Education Students Facilitating and Promoting Interculturality in Online Initial Interactions. British Journal of Educational Studies 71:6 ► pp. 637 ff. DOI logo
Koskinen, Emmi & Melisa Stevanovic
2022. Epistemic calibration. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Rodriguez, Andrea
2022. “Ay no I do feel exhausted”: Affiliative practices and interpersonal relationships in indirect complaints in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 194 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Rodriguez, Andrea
2022. Complaining. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Linsen & Yongping Ran
2022. Rationalizing impoliteness: Taking offence and providing vicarious accounts in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law conflict mediation. Journal of Pragmatics 197 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Clift, Rebecca & Michael Haugh
2021. Conversation Analysis and Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 616 ff. DOI logo
Mace, Stephanie, Sarah Collins & Susan Speer
2021. Talking about breast symmetry in the breast cancer clinic: What can we learn from an examination of clinical interaction?. Health Expectations 24:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Sinkeviciute, Valeria & Andrea Rodriguez
2021. “So… introductions”: Conversational openings in getting acquainted interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2020. Urban interaction ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.