Much of the research on affiliation to date has focused on how people do (dis)affiliation. This paper explores the remedial work that follows instances of disaffiliation between interactants who are getting acquainted. Building on an interactional pragmatics analytical approach informed by methods and research in conversation analysis, findings indicate that extended remedial accounts recurrently follow moments of disaffiliation in initial interactions. These remedial accounts enable participants to reposition a prior disaffiliative stance as (ostensibly) affiliative. It appears in initial interactions, then, that remedial accounts play an important role in modulating troubles in affiliating. We propose that the considerable interactional work undertaken by these participants to modulate such troubles reflects a general preference for agreeability in initial interactions, at least amongst (Australian and British) speakers of English.
2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105.
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew
1979Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
2011 “Proposing Shared Knowledge as a Means of Pursuing Agreement.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 207–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1993Social Accountability in Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Clayman, Steven E.
1992 “Caveat Orator: Audience Disaffiliation in the 1988 Presidential Debates.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 78 (1): 33–60.
2016 “Don’t Make Me Laugh: Responsive Laughter in (Dis)Affiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 1001: 73–88.
Curl, Traci S., John Local, and Gareth Walker
2006 “Repetition and the Prosody – Pragmatics Interface.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1721–1751.
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen
2012 “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text & Talk 32 (4): 433–451.
1992 “The Interactive Achievement of a Sentence: Joint Productions in Therapeutic Discourse.” Discourse Processes 15 (2): 207–228.
2016“That’s What I Thought as Well”: Doing Affiliation in Initial Interactions. Unpublished BA dissertation. York St John University.
2018Accounting for Disaffiliations: Remedying (Dis)Affiliations in Initial Interactions between American and British Speakers of English. Unpublished MA dissertation. York St John University.
Flint, Natalie, and Andrew John Merrison
Under review. “On the Collaborative Nature of Accounting: Remedying Potentially Divisive and/or Delicate Topics in Intercultural Initial Interactions.”
1971 “Remedial Interchanges.” In Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order, 95–187. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2007 “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2011 “Humour, Face and Im/politeness in Getting Acquainted.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh and Andrew John Merrison, 165–184. London: Continuum.
2012 “Conversational Interaction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2015 “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 86 (1): 36–42.
2017a “Mockery and (Non-)Seriousness in Initial Interactions Amongst American and Australian Speakers of English.” In Handbook of Communication in Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. by Donal Carbaugh, 104–117. Abingdon: Routledge.
2017b “Jocular Language Play, Social Action and (Dis)Affiliation in Conversational Interaction.” In Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, ed. by Nancy Bell, 143–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
2015 “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions Amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua 34 (4): 461–493.
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
2018 “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy in Initial Interactions.” Discourse Studies 31 (2): 246–269.
2013 “Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 167–190. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
1988 “Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” In Analyzing Lay Explanation: A Case Book of Methods, ed. by Charles Antaki, 127–144. London: Sage.
2012 “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 430–448.
2015 “Collaboratively Organized Stancetaking in Japanese: Sharing and Negotiating Stance within the Turn Constructional Unit.” Journal of Pragmatics 831: 104–119.
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441.
1990 “List Construction as a Task and Resource”, In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. Washington DC: University Press of America.
1993 “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 1–30.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2013 “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Maynard, Douglas W., and Don H. Zimmerman
1984 “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly 47 (4): 301–316.
McLaughlin, Margaret L., Michael J. Cody, and Nancy E. Rosenstein
1983 “Account Sequences in Conversations between Strangers.” Communication Monographs 50 (2): 102–125.
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh
2015 “Agency, Accountability and Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 207–238.
1990 “Reconceptualizing Social Accounts: An Agenda for Theory Building and Empirical Research.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 101: 113–144.
1996 “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, 407–438. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2010 “Making Way and Making Sense: Including Newcomers in Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 73 (2): 152–175.
2011 “Doing Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication Monographs 78 (1): 73–95.
1975Second Assessments: A Study of Some Features of Agreements/Disagreements. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988 “Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373.
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
(2013) “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
1995Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1988 “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wooton. 89–135. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1990Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman
1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62.
Semin, Gün R., and Antony S. R. Manstead
1983The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
2010 “An Overview of the Question–Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (10): 2772–2781.
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31.
2010 ““Have You been Married, Or…?”: Eliciting and Accounting for Relationship Histories in Speed-Dating Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (3): 260–282.
1999Getting Acquainted in Conversation: A Study of Initial Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
2014 “Direct and Indirect Self-Presentation in First Conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33 (3): 302–327.
2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by 10 other publications
Clift, Rebecca & Michael Haugh
2021. Conversation Analysis and Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 616 ff.
2020. Urban interaction ritual. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
2022. Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality. Text & Talk 0:0
Koskinen, Emmi & Melisa Stevanovic
2022. Epistemic calibration. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3 ► pp. 354 ff.
Mace, Stephanie, Sarah Collins & Susan Speer
2021. Talking about breast symmetry in the breast cancer clinic: What can we learn from an examination of clinical interaction?. Health Expectations 24:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
2022. “Ay no I do feel exhausted”: Affiliative practices and interpersonal relationships in indirect complaints in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 194 ► pp. 39 ff.
2021. “So… introductions”: Conversational openings in getting acquainted interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 44 ff.
Zhao, Linsen & Yongping Ran
2022. Rationalizing impoliteness: Taking offence and providing vicarious accounts in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law conflict mediation. Journal of Pragmatics 197 ► pp. 69 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.