Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 28:4 (2018) ► pp. 463488

Full-text

The structural format and rhetorical variation of writing Chinese judicial opinions
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2011 “Cross-examining Lawyers, Facework and the Adversarial Courtroom.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (13): 3216–3230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1975/1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Aanalysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1997 “Genre Analysis Today.” Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 75 (3): 629–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 “Creativity and Accessibility in Written Professional Discourse.” World Englishes 27 (3/4): 319–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blitvich, Pilar
2010 “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2 (1): 46–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Le, King Kui Sin, and Ying-Long Zheng
2008 “Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and American Court Judgments.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 2 (1): 49–58.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr
1990Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duke, Nell K., Samantha Caughlan, Mary Juzwik, and Nicole Martin
2012Reading and Writing Genre with Purpose in K-8 Classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hafner, Chris A.
2013 “The Discursive Construction of Professional Expertise: Appeals to Authority in Barrister’s Opinions.” English for Specific Purposes 32 (3): 131–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Zhengrui
2011 “The Discursive Construction of Civil Judgments in Mainland China.” Discourse & Society 22 (6): 743–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Legal Communication of Chinese Judiciary: A Discourse-based View. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “The Mediatisation of Chinese Corporate Communication: A Linguistic Approach.” East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 127–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Zhengrui, and Li Xiaoyu
2011 “Discourse of International Commercial Arbitration: The Case of Mainland China.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1380–1391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1995 “Pragmatics and Power.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (2): 117–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heffer, Chris
2005The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal-Lay Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Frances K., and Lauren Spencer
2012Write to Inform. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2004Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2001 “Discourse Analysis and Narrative.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton, 635–649. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel
2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalscheur, Heidi A.
2012 “About ‘Face’: Using Moral Rights to Increase Copyright Enforcement in China.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 39 (2): 513–538.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A.
1991Aristotle, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2011 “Oral Narratives of Personal Experience.” In Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, ed. by P. C. Hogan, 546–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
1967 “Narrative Analysis.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, ed. by J. Helm, 12–44. Seattle: U. of Washington Press. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History 7: 3–38.Google Scholar
Leflar, Robert A.
1961 “Some Observations Concerning Judicial Opinions.” Columbia Law Review 61(5): 810–820.Google Scholar
Leung, Janny H. C.
2012 “Judicial Discourse in Cantonese Courtrooms in Postcolonial Hong Kong: The Judge as a Godfather, Scholar, Educator and Scolding Parent.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19 (2): 239–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Huixing
2011A General Introduction to Civil Law. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Maley, Yon
1985 “Judicial Discourse: The Case of Legal Judgment.” In The Cultivated Australian, ed. by J. E. Clark, 159–175. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Mao, Luming R.
1993 “I Conclude Not: Toward a Pragmatic Account of Metadiscourse.” Rhetoric Review 11 (2): 265–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., and David Rose
2009Genre Relations: Mapping Cultures. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E.
1990Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
2002 “ Genre, Text type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Classrooms.” In Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspective, ed. by Ann M. Jones, 73–90. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Purcell-Gates, Victoria, Nell K. Duke, and Joseph A. Martineau
2007 “Learning to Read and Write Genre-specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching.” Reading Research Quarterly 42 (1): 8–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Herbert W., and Jean G. Jones
2011Persuasion in Society (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Drury
2003 “To Whom is the Law Addressed.” Yale Law & Policy Review 21 (1): 105–167.Google Scholar
Van Den Hoven, Paul
2011 “The Unchangeable Judicial Formats.” Argumentation 45: 499–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo J.
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio
2013 “Authoritative Intervention in Legal Discourse: A Genre-based Study of Judgments and Arbitration Awards.” Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada 26: 91–103.Google Scholar
Wells, Michael
1994 “French and American Judicial Opinions.” Yale Journal of International Law 19: 81–133.Google Scholar
Zhang, Liping
2007 “Evaluation in the Language of Law: Appraisal and Its Linguistic Realizations in Chinese Courtroom Discourse (以“评”说“法”: 法庭辩论中的评价资源与实现手段).” Foreign Language Teaching (外语教学) 6: 29–33.Google Scholar