Article published in:
Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence: Discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches
Edited by Caroline Gentens, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck and An Van linden
[Pragmatics 29:2] 2019
► pp. 226249

Full-text

The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions
Primary sources

Primary sources

Deutsches Textarchiv
. Grundlage für ein Referenzkorpus der neuhochdeutschen Sprache, Berlin, http://​www​.deutschestextarchiv​.de/ (23.122018).
DWDS. Das Wortauskunftssystem zur deutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart
, Berlin, https://​www​.dwds​.de (23.122018).
Homer
: Iliad. Homeri Opera in five volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1920http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus:text:1999​.01​.0133 (23.122018).
Kali-Korpus
, Leibniz Universität Hannover, http://​www​.kali​.uni​-hannover​.de (23122018).
Otfrid: Evangelienbuch
Edited by Oskar Erdmann. 6th edition edited by Ludwig Wolff. Tübingen: Niemeyer 1973.Google Scholar

Refererences

Abraham, Werner
2008 “On the Logic of Generalizations about Cross-Linguistic Aspect-Modality Links.” In Modality-Aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 3–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “(Inter)Subjectification or Foreign Consciousness/Other’s Mind Alignment as Synchronic and Diachronic Concepts of Change? Conceptualizations and Data Fidelity.” In Covert patterns of modality, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner, and Maiko Nisihiwaki
2016 “Modal Verbs in German and Definiteness Effects in Verbal Complements – Focusing on Modern Standard German sollen and Middle High German suln ‘shall’.” In Definiteness Effects: Bilingual, Typological, and Diachronic Variation, ed. by Susan Fischer, Tanja Kupisch, and Esther Rinke, 244–276. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Allan, Rutger J.
2013 “Exploring Modality’s Semantic Space. Grammaticalization, Subjectification and the Case of ὀφείλω.” Glotta 89: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Anne
1982Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bassett, Samuel Eliot
2003 [1966]The Poetry of Homer. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966De la subjectivité dans le langage. Problèmes de la linguistique générale, 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Henrik
2015 “Epistemic Marking and Multiple Perspective. An Introduction.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 68/2: 123–141.Google Scholar
2017 “The Role of ‘Perspective’ in Epistemic Marking.” Lingua 186/187: 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1999 [1934] Sprachtheorie . Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Reprint Jena: Fischer. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Butt, John, and Carmen Benjamin
2013New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2006 “Future Tense and Future Time Reference.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 704–706. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2017 “Viewpoint Phenomena in Constructions and Discourse.” Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 2(1), 37.1–22 [Special issue Perspective-taking, ed. by Stefan Hinterwimmer, and Petra B. Schumacher]: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
2016 “Discourse Viewpoint as Network.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 13–40. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, Irene
2007 “Homer.” In Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 2, ed. by Irene de Jong, and René Nünlist, 17–38. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse
2012 “Time in Sentences with Modal Verbs.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, 989–1019. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006 “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–392.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
1999Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 208]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Mechthild Habermann
2005 “Die Entwicklung von werden + Infinitiv als Futurgrammem: ein Beispiel für das Zusammenwirken von Grammatikalisierung, Sprachkontakt und soziokulturellen Faktoren.” In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9], ed. by Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt, 230–250. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duijn, Max van, and Arie Verhagen
Forthcoming. “Beyond Triadic Communication: a Three-Dimensional Conceptual Space for Modeling Intersubjectivity.” In Subjectivity and Stance. Usage-Based Studies in Epistemic Structuring ed. by Dylan Glynn, and Karolina Krawczak Amsterdam John Benjamins
Ducrot, Oswald
1984Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2014The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse. How Texts Allow Us to Mind-read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nick
2005 “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover, and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina
2006 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface.” http://​web​.eecs​.umich​.edu​/~rthomaso​/lpw06​/fallerpaper​.pdf (20.052018).
Fludernik, Monika
1993The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd
1997 “Historische Semantik der Modalverben. Problemskizze – Exemplarische Analysen – Forschungsübersicht.” In Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen, ed. by Gerd Fritz, and Thomas Gloning, 1–157. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ghesquiere, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems, and Freek Van de Velde
2014 “Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification. Typology and Operationalization.” In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification. Grammar and Discourse [Current Topics 65], ed. by Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde, 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Glas, Reinhold
1984‘sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gloning, Thomas
2001 “Gebrauchsweisen von Modalverben und Texttraditionen.” In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte: Sonderheft 9], ed. by Reimar Müller, and Marga Reis, 177–200. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hansen, Björn
2009 “The Hypothetical Use of Polish ‘mieć plus Infinitive’ Revisited.” In Von grammatischen Kategorien und sprachlichen Weltbildern – Die Slavia von der Sprachgeschichte bis zur Politsprache (Festschrift für Daniel Weiss zum 60. Geburtstag) [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 73], ed. by Tilman Berger, Markus Giger, Sibylle Kurt, and Imke Mendoza (eds.), 177–185. München: Kubon & Sagner.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2012 “Polish mieć and the Semantic Map of Interpretive Deontics.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 57/2: 129–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb.” In Selected Writings 11, 130–147. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline
1998 “A Framework for the Description of Latin Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 205–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael, Friedrich Blass, and Bernhard Gerth
1870Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Volume 2/1. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Łaziński, Marek
2001 “Was für ein Perfekt gibt es im modernen Polnisch? Bemerkungen zum Artikel ‚Gibt es ein Perfekt im modernen Polnisch?‘ von H. Weydt und A. Kazimierczak.” Linguistik online 8/1. URL https://​bop​.unibe​.ch​/linguistik​-online​/article​/view​/979​/1637 (05.042018).
Maché, Jakob
2008 “The Autopsy of a Modal – Insights from the Historical Development of German.” In Modality-Aspect Interfaces. Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 385–415. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore
2008The Future in Greek. From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2017 “Three Types of Subjectivity, Three Types of Intersubjectivity, their Dynamicization and a Synthesis.” In Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)Subjectification and Directionality, ed. by Daniёl Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens, and Lobke Ghesquière, 19–46. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, Günther
1989Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sanders, José
1994Perspective in Narrative Discourse. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.Google Scholar
Schrott, Angela
1997 “Futur du passé im Französischen der Gegenwart.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 48/1: 41–68.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2012 “On Some Problematic Aspects of Subjectification.” Language Dynamics and Change 2: 34–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef
2012 “Minds Divided. Speaker Attitudes in Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Stance as Participant Structure: A Jakobsonian Approach to the Pragmatics and Semantics of Evidentiality.” In Evidentiality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface [ Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29], ed. by Bert Cornillie, and Juana I. Marín Arrese, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Quoted version: http://​people​.anu​.edu​.au​/stef​.spronck​/publications​.html (20.052018).
Sugayama, Kensei
2006 “The Grammar of Be To: From a Word Grammar Point of View.” In Word Grammar. New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure, ed. by Kensei Sugayama, and Richard A. Hudson, 90–108. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2012 “Introduction: Viewpoint and Perspective in Language and Gesture, from the Ground Up.” In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, and Eve Sweetser, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “From subjectification to intersubjectification.” In Motives for language change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification. A Reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Herbert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005 “The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia.” Linguistic Typology 9: 223–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2013 “Facets of Subjectification.” Language Sciences 36: 7–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wakker, Gerry C.
2006 “Future Auxiliaries or Not.” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek. Proceedings of the Conference on ‘Greek Syntax and Word Classes’ Held in Madrid on 18–21 June 2003, ed. by Emilio Crespo, Jesús de La Villa, and A. R. Revuelta (eds), 237–255. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
2007 “Intentions and Future Realisations in Herodotus.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. by Rutger Allan, and Michel Buijs, 168–187. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeman, Sonja
2013 “Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität.” In Funktionen von Modalität [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 55], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 335–336. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “(C)Overt Modality and its Perspectival Effects on the Textual Surface.” In Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Complementary Series 149], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), 457–484. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Confronting Perspectives. Modeling Perspectival Complexity in Language and Cognition.” Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 2/1: 6 [Special issue Perspective-taking, ed. by Stefan Hinterwimmer, and Petra B. Schumacher]: 1–22.Google Scholar
2018a “Expressing the Selves: Subject Splits and Viewpoint Hierarchies in Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Expressing the Self: Cultural Diversity and Cognitive Universals, ed. by Minyao Huang, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 143–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018b “Zukunft in der Grammatik: Neues vom Schicksalsfutur.” In Die Zukunft der Grammatik – die Grammatik der Zukunft [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 92], ed. by Elisabeth Leiss, and Sonja Zeman, 449–481. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2018cWhat is a Narration – And Why Does It Matter? In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Language [Linguistics today/Linguistik aktuell 247], ed. by Annika Hübl, and Markus Steinbach, 174–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Wer spricht? Disambiguierungsfaktoren bei der Perspektivensetzung im narrativen Diskurs. Linguistische Berichte [Sonderband „Rede- und Gedankenwiedergabe in narrativen Strukturen – Ambiguitäten und Varianz“ ed. by Stefan Engelberg & Irene Rapp
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021. In a Manner of Speaking: How Reported Speech May Have Shaped Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6 Crossref logo
Zeman, Sonja
2020. Parameters of Narrative Perspectivization: The Narrator. Open Library of Humanities 6:2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.