This paper tackles the question of how multiple viewpoints emerge through the interplay of different viewpoint
parameters within the (i) dynamics of discourse and (ii) their diachronic development. In particular, it will focus on ‘Future of
Fate’ (FoF) (e.g. He was never to return.), i.e. future-in-the-past meanings with potentially distinct values
both on the semantic dimension of temporality and the dimension of knowledge attribution. These viewpoint meanings are ‘irregular’
in the sense that they cannot be predicted solely on the basis of the grammatical context of past modal obligation. Based on
empirical analyses of German sollte + inf. and the méllō construction in Homeric Greek, it is
shown that the – diachronic as well as synchronic – emergence of viewpoints is the result of the interplay between the deictic
structure of grammatical elements and the perspectival structure of discourse context.
2012 “(Inter)Subjectification or Foreign Consciousness/Other’s Mind Alignment as Synchronic and Diachronic Concepts of Change? Conceptualizations and Data Fidelity.” In Covert patterns of modality, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Abraham, Werner, and Maiko Nisihiwaki
2016 “Modal Verbs in German and Definiteness Effects in Verbal Complements – Focusing on Modern Standard German sollen and Middle High German suln ‘shall’.” In Definiteness Effects: Bilingual, Typological, and Diachronic Variation, ed. by Susan Fischer, Tanja Kupisch, and Esther Rinke, 244–276. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Allan, Rutger J.
2013 “Exploring Modality’s Semantic Space. Grammaticalization, Subjectification and the Case of ὀφείλω.” Glotta 891: 1–46.
Banfield, Anne
1982Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bassett, Samuel Eliot
2003 [1966]The Poetry of Homer. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Benveniste, Émile
1966De la subjectivité dans le langage. Problèmes de la linguistique générale, 11. Paris: Gallimard.
Bergqvist, Henrik
2015 “Epistemic Marking and Multiple Perspective. An Introduction.” STUF – Language Typology and Universals 68/21: 123–141.
Bergqvist, Henrik
2017 “The Role of ‘Perspective’ in Epistemic Marking.” Lingua 186/1871: 5–20.
Bühler, Karl
1999 [1934]Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Reprint Jena: Fischer. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Butt, John, and Carmen Benjamin
2013New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish. London: Routledge.
Dahl, Östen
2006 “Future Tense and Future Time Reference.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 704–706. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dancygier, Barbara
2017 “Viewpoint Phenomena in Constructions and Discourse.” Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 2(1), 37.1–22 [Special issue Perspective-taking, ed. by Stefan Hinterwimmer, and Petra B. Schumacher]: 1–22.
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
2016 “Discourse Viewpoint as Network.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 13–40. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
De Jong, Irene
2007 “Homer.” In Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 21, ed. by Irene de Jong, and René Nünlist, 17–38. Leiden: Brill.
Depraetere, Ilse
2012 “Time in Sentences with Modal Verbs.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, 989–1019. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006 “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 171: 365–392.
Diewald, Gabriele
1999Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 208]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Diewald, Gabriele, and Mechthild Habermann
2005 “Die Entwicklung von werden + Infinitiv als Futurgrammem: ein Beispiel für das Zusammenwirken von Grammatikalisierung, Sprachkontakt und soziokulturellen Faktoren.” In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9], ed. by Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt, 230–250. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
1984Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.
Eckardt, Regine
2014The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse. How Texts Allow Us to Mind-read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.
Evans, Nick
2005 “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover, and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Faller, Martina
2006 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface.” [URL] (20.052018).
Fludernik, Monika
1993The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
Fritz, Gerd
1997 “Historische Semantik der Modalverben. Problemskizze – Exemplarische Analysen – Forschungsübersicht.” In Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen, ed. by Gerd Fritz, and Thomas Gloning, 1–157. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ghesquiere, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems, and Freek Van de Velde
2014 “Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification. Typology and Operationalization.” In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification. Grammar and Discourse [Current Topics 65], ed. by Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde, 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Glas, Reinhold
1984‘sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Narr.
Gloning, Thomas
2001 “Gebrauchsweisen von Modalverben und Texttraditionen.” In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte: Sonderheft 9], ed. by Reimar Müller, and Marga Reis, 177–200. Hamburg: Buske.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hansen, Björn
2009 “The Hypothetical Use of Polish ‘mieć plus Infinitive’ Revisited.” In Von grammatischen Kategorien und sprachlichen Weltbildern – Die Slavia von der Sprachgeschichte bis zur Politsprache (Festschrift für Daniel Weiss zum 60. Geburtstag) [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 73], ed. by Tilman Berger, Markus Giger, Sibylle Kurt, and Imke Mendoza (eds.), 177–185. München: Kubon & Sagner.
Holvoet, Axel
2012 “Polish mieć and the Semantic Map of Interpretive Deontics.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 57/21: 129–146.
Jakobson, Roman
1957 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb.” In Selected Writings 111, 130–147. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Kroon, Caroline
1998 “A Framework for the Description of Latin Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 301: 205–223.
Kühner, Raphael, Friedrich Blass, and Bernhard Gerth
1870Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Volume 2/11. Hannover: Hahn.
Łaziński, Marek
2001 “Was für ein Perfekt gibt es im modernen Polnisch? Bemerkungen zum Artikel ‚Gibt es ein Perfekt im modernen Polnisch?‘ von H. Weydt und A. Kazimierczak.” Linguistik online 8/11. URL [URL] (05.042018).
2008The Future in Greek. From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Narrog, Heiko
2017 “Three Types of Subjectivity, Three Types of Intersubjectivity, their Dynamicization and a Synthesis.” In Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)Subjectification and Directionality, ed. by Daniёl Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens, and Lobke Ghesquière, 19–46. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Öhlschläger, Günther
1989Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sanders, José
1994Perspective in Narrative Discourse. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
Schrott, Angela
1997 “Futur du passé im Französischen der Gegenwart.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 48/11: 41–68.
Smirnova, Elena
2012 “On Some Problematic Aspects of Subjectification.” Language Dynamics and Change 21: 34–58.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spronck, Stef
2012 “Minds Divided. Speaker Attitudes in Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Spronck, Stef
2015 “Stance as Participant Structure: A Jakobsonian Approach to the Pragmatics and Semantics of Evidentiality.” In Evidentiality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29], ed. by Bert Cornillie, and Juana I. Marín Arrese, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Quoted version: [URL] (20.052018).
Sugayama, Kensei
2006 “The Grammar of Be To: From a Word Grammar Point of View.” In Word Grammar. New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure, ed. by Kensei Sugayama, and Richard A. Hudson, 90–108. London/New York: Continuum.
Sweetser, Eve
2012 “Introduction: Viewpoint and Perspective in Language and Gesture, from the Ground Up.” In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, and Eve Sweetser, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 651: 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 “From subjectification to intersubjectification.” In Motives for language change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 “(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification. A Reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Herbert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2005 “The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia.” Linguistic Typology 91: 223–268.
Visconti, Jacqueline
2013 “Facets of Subjectification.” Language Sciences 361: 7–17.
Wakker, Gerry C.
2006 “Future Auxiliaries or Not.” In Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek. Proceedings of the Conference on ‘Greek Syntax and Word Classes’ Held in Madrid on 18–21 June 2003, ed. by Emilio Crespo, Jesús de La Villa, and A. R. Revuelta (eds), 237–255. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
Wakker, Gerry C.
2007 “Intentions and Future Realisations in Herodotus.” In The Language of Literature: Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, ed. by Rutger Allan, and Michel Buijs, 168–187. Leiden: Brill.
Zeman, Sonja
2013 “Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität.” In Funktionen von Modalität [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 55], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 335–336. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Zeman, Sonja
2014 “(C)Overt Modality and its Perspectival Effects on the Textual Surface.” In Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Complementary Series 149], ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), 457–484. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeman, Sonja
2017 “Confronting Perspectives. Modeling Perspectival Complexity in Language and Cognition.” Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics 2/1: 6 [Special issue Perspective-taking, ed. by Stefan Hinterwimmer, and Petra B. Schumacher]: 1–22.
Zeman, Sonja
2018a “Expressing the Selves: Subject Splits and Viewpoint Hierarchies in Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Expressing the Self: Cultural Diversity and Cognitive Universals, ed. by Minyao Huang, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 143–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeman, Sonja
2018b “Zukunft in der Grammatik: Neues vom Schicksalsfutur.” In Die Zukunft der Grammatik – die Grammatik der Zukunft [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 92], ed. by Elisabeth Leiss, and Sonja Zeman, 449–481. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Zeman, Sonja
2018cWhat is a Narration – And Why Does It Matter? In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Language [Linguistics today/Linguistik aktuell 247], ed. by Annika Hübl, and Markus Steinbach, 174–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeman, Sonja
Forthcoming. Wer spricht? Disambiguierungsfaktoren bei der Perspektivensetzung im narrativen Diskurs. Linguistische Berichte [Sonderband „Rede- und Gedankenwiedergabe in narrativen Strukturen – Ambiguitäten und Varianz“ ed. by Stefan Engelberg & Irene Rapp
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Bloom, Barthe, Malika Reetz & Ulrike Demske
2024. Romankorpus Frühneuhochdeutsch (Roko.UP): A Collection of Early Modern German Narrative Prose. Journal of Open Humanities Data 10
de Vries, Clarissa, Bert Oben & Geert Brône
2021. Exploring the role of the body in communicating ironic stance. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021. In a Manner of Speaking: How Reported Speech May Have Shaped Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6
Zeman, Sonja
2020. Parameters of Narrative Perspectivization: The Narrator. Open Library of Humanities 6:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.