Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 1–14

The pragmatics of ritual

An introduction

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| University of Hamburg | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
This introductory position paper aims to familiarise the reader with the pragmatics of ritual and previous research in this field. Ritual is a complex pragmatic phenomenon present in many types of interaction, and it has been subject to academic inquiries in various disciplines. We will draw on previous research to provide a working definition of ritual, which will help us to introduce the present collection of papers. We will then introduce the different, but interrelated, methodologies used in ritual research, categorising these complementary methodologies as ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ respectively. We use this categorisation to overview the contributions of the special issue from a methodological perspective. Finally, a summary of the contents of the special issue completes this introduction.
Keywords: ritual, definition, methodological approaches
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The main features and a working definition of ritual
  • 3.Contents
    • 3.1Methodologies
    • 3.2Contributions
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 13 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19016.kad
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C.
2004 “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory 22 (4): 527–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnovick, Leslie
1984 Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel
1999 “Ritual Levelling: The Balance between the Eristic and Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal Encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama.” In Historical Dialogue Analysis, ed. by Andreas Jucker, Gerd Fritz, and Franz Lebsanft, 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness, and Ritual Display in Early-Modern Dutch Letter Writing.” In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 37–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Maurice Waddle
2019 “ ‘Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question’: The Impact of Quoting Members of the Public in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 56–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall
2004 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1981 “Conversational Routine.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
1912 [1954/2001] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis
1981 Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Edwards, Walter
1989 Modern Japan Through Its Weddings: Gender, Person, and Society in Ritual Portrayal. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1983 “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Ronald L.
1990 Ritual Criticism: Case Studies in Its Practice, Essays on Its Theory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2004 “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Politeness in English and Japanese.” Multilingua 23 (2): 85–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn
2019 “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 32–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
1989 “Politeness in English and German: the Functions of Please and Bitte.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, N.J.Google Scholar
Ide, Risako
1998 “ ‘Sorry for your Kindness’: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 509–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Marquez-Reiter
2015 “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb
1997 “Religious Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 261: 47–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopytko, Roman
2007 “Philosophy and Pragmatics: A Language-game with Ludwig Wittgenstein.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (5): 792–812. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koutlaki, Sofia A.
2002 “Offers and Expressions of Thanks as Face Enhancing Acts: Tæ’arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1733–1756. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Language in The Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular, ed. by William Labov, 297–353. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1981 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lüger, Heinz-Helmut
1983 “Some Aspects of Ritual Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (6): 695–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Penny
1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 25 (1): 27–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muir, Edwards
2005 Ritual in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohashi, Jun
2013 Thanking and Politeness in Japanese: Balancing Acts in Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben
1995 “Language Crossing and the Problematisation of Ethnicity and Socialization.” Pragmatics 5 (4): 485–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Interaction Ritual and Not Just Artful Performance in Crossing and Stylization.” Language in Society 38 (2): 149–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter, and Ellen Basso
2009 Ritual Communication. Oxford: Berg Books.Google Scholar
Shardakova, Maria
2005 “Intercultural Pragmatics in the Speech of American L2 Learners of Russian: Apologies Offered by Americans in Russian.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (4): 423–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2013 “Decoding Coded (Im)politeness: ‘Cause on My Teasing You Can Depend”’. Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Philip, Timothy L. Phillips, and Ryan. D. King
2010 Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staal, Fritz
1979 “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen 26 (1): 2–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor H.
1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
1974 “Liminal to Liminoid in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology.” Rice University Studies 60 (3): 53–92.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, Arnold
1960 The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert
1989 Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

The pragmatics of ritual
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021.  In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Mao, Yansheng, Xinyue Tian & Xiaojiang Wang
2021. I will empty it, be my guest: A pragmatic study of toasting in Chinese culture. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Zhou, Ling
2020. Moral stance taking as a device of covert aggression in Chinese political language use. Discourse, Context & Media 36 ► pp. 100415 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.