Cover not available
Article published In:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 1–14

The pragmatics of ritual

An introduction

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| University of Hamburg | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
This introductory position paper aims to familiarise the reader with the pragmatics of ritual and previous research in this field. Ritual is a complex pragmatic phenomenon present in many types of interaction, and it has been subject to academic inquiries in various disciplines. We will draw on previous research to provide a working definition of ritual, which will help us to introduce the present collection of papers. We will then introduce the different, but interrelated, methodologies used in ritual research, categorising these complementary methodologies as ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ respectively. We use this categorisation to overview the contributions of the special issue from a methodological perspective. Finally, a summary of the contents of the special issue completes this introduction.
Keywords: ritual, definition, methodological approaches
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The main features and a working definition of ritual
  • 3.Contents
    • 3.1Methodologies
    • 3.2Contributions
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 13 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19016.kad
References (45)
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory 22 (4): 527–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnovick, Leslie. 1984. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 1999. “Ritual Levelling: The Balance between the Eristic and Contractual Motive in Hostile Verbal Encounters in Medieval Romance and Early Modern Drama.” In Historical Dialogue Analysis, ed. by Andreas Jucker, Gerd Fritz, and Franz Lebsanft, 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness, and Ritual Display in Early-Modern Dutch Letter Writing.” In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 37–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Maurice Waddle. 2019. “‘Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question’: The Impact of Quoting Members of the Public in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 56–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. “Conversational Routine.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1912 [1954/2001]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis. 1981. Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Edwards, Walter. 1989. Modern Japan Through Its Weddings: Gender, Person, and Society in Ritual Portrayal. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Ronald L. 1990. Ritual Criticism: Case Studies in Its Practice, Essays on Its Theory. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2004. “Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Politeness in English and Japanese.” Multilingua 23 (2): 85–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn. 2019. “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 32–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 1989. “Politeness in English and German: the Functions of Please and Bitte.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, N.J.Google Scholar
Ide, Risako. 1998. “‘Sorry for your Kindness’: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 509–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Marquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 1997. “Religious Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 261: 47–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytko, Roman. 2007. “Philosophy and Pragmatics: A Language-game with Ludwig Wittgenstein.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (5): 792–812. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutlaki, Sofia A. 2002. “Offers and Expressions of Thanks as Face Enhancing Acts: Tæ’arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1733–1756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Language in The Inner City: Studies in Black English Vernacular, ed. by William Labov, 297–353. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1981. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lüger, Heinz-Helmut. 1983. “Some Aspects of Ritual Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 7 (6): 695–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Penny. 1996. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 25 (1): 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muir, Edwards. 2005. Ritual in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2013. Thanking and Politeness in Japanese: Balancing Acts in Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1995. “Language Crossing and the Problematisation of Ethnicity and Socialization.” Pragmatics 5 (4): 485–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Interaction Ritual and Not Just Artful Performance in Crossing and Stylization.” Language in Society 38 (2): 149–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter, and Ellen Basso. 2009. Ritual Communication. Oxford: Berg Books.Google Scholar
Shardakova, Maria. 2005. “Intercultural Pragmatics in the Speech of American L2 Learners of Russian: Apologies Offered by Americans in Russian.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (4): 423–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2013. “Decoding Coded (Im)politeness: ‘Cause on My Teasing You Can Depend”’. Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Philip, Timothy L. Phillips, and Ryan. D. King. 2010. Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staal, Fritz. 1979. “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen 26 (1): 2–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor H. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
1974. “Liminal to Liminoid in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology.” Rice University Studies 60 (3): 53–92.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1989. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Wang, Keyuan, Zepeng Wang & Yansheng Mao
2024. Hospitality and ritual: A discursive study of toasting in Chinese dining contexts. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Zhang, Yining
2024. A Study on Internet Interactive Language Variations from the Perspective of Schema Theory. Journal of Educational Research and Policies 6:9 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Cordova, Giovanni
2023. I santi degli altri. Devozione, mutamento e rituali tra i singalesi cattolici a Messina. Archivio antropologico mediterraneo 25:2 DOI logo
Liao, Guohai & Dengshan Xia
2023. Historical poem-quoting interaction: An interaction-speech act-ritual integrative study of fù in ancient China. Journal of Pragmatics 214 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Shelby R., Hilal Ergül & Salvatore Attardo
2022. “Dr. Shelby, that’s a world record!”. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Mao, Yansheng, Xinyue Tian & Xiaojiang Wang
2021. I will empty it, be my guest: A pragmatic study of toasting in Chinese culture. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Ling
2020. Moral stance taking as a device of covert aggression in Chinese political language use. Discourse, Context & Media 36 ► pp. 100415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.