Cover not available
Article published In:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 15–39

The socialisation of interactional rituals

A case study of ritual cursing as a form of teasing in Romani

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
The present paper examines the ways in which ritual cursing operates as a form of teasing in (Gabor) Roma communities. By ‘ritual cursing’ we mean forms of curse that are believed to cause harm to the cursed person or people related to them, i.e. cursing studied here differs from swearing and ‘cussing’, as it embodies supernatural beliefs to a degree. While cursing is an archetype of ritual, to date little pragmatic research has been done on this phenomenon, supposedly due to the scarcity of interactional data collected in cultures where cursing is actively practised; thus, the present paper fills a knowledge gap in the field. We examine cursing in interactions where it is used as teasing in order to socialise young children. Since ritual is a means through which social structures are re-created (Durkheim 1912 [1954/2001]), aiding young language users to acquire rituals is a key aspect of community life. However, little research has been done on the ways in which ritual practices are socialised in communities at the level of interaction, which validates our focus on teasing curses. The phenomenon studied is also relevant to previous sociopragmatic research on teasing: whilst in other (non-ritual) sociocultural settings socialising teasing implies aiding young language users to distinguish between humour and offence, due to the potential harm attributed to ritual cursing its socialisation is centred both on harm and the offence in the conventional sense of the word.
Keywords: cursing, Roma, ritual, socialisation, teasing, harm
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.This study
    • 2.1Objectives
    • 2.2Data and methodology
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Forms of address
    • 3.2False information delivered via interactional ritual chains
    • 3.3Nonverbal contextualisation cues
    • 3.4The ritual contextual frame
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 22 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19017.kad
References (64)
References
Agyekum, Kofi. 1999. “The Pragmatics of duabɔ ‘Grievance Imprecation’ Taboo among the Akan.” Pragmatics 91: 357–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “ Ntam ‘Reminiscential Oath’ Taboo in Akan.” Language in Society 331: 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage. 1999. “Jeffersons’s Transcript Notation.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworsky and Nicolas Coupland, 158–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness, and Ritual Display in Early-Modern Dutch Letter Writing.” In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár, 37–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Berta, Péter. 2019. Materializing Difference. Consumer Culture, Politics and Ethnicity among Romanian Roma. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Blount, Ben G., and Elise Padgug. 1977. “Prosodic, Paralinguistic, and Interactional Features in Parent–Child Speech: English and Spanish.” Journal of Child Language 4 (1): 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2005. “Gender and Language Ideologies.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 447–467. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croom, Adam. 2013. “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language & Communication 33 (3): 177–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 1997. Death, Ritual and Belief: The Rhetoric of Funerary Rites. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1912 [1954/2001]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 2012. Moral Education. Trans. Everett K. Wilson, and Herman Schnurer. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Eder, Donna. 1993. “‘Go get ya a French!’: Romantic and Sexual Teasing among Adolescent Girls.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 17–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Ann R. 1986. “Teasing: Verbal Play in Two Mexicano Homes.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmons, Sally L. 2000. “A Disarming Laughter: The Role of Humor in Tribal Cultures. An Examination of Humor in Contemporary Native American Literature and Art.” Doctoral thesis, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Fosztó, László. 2008. “Taking the Oath: Religious Aspects of Moral Personhood among the Romungre.” In Roma/Zigeunerkulturen in neuen Perspektiven. Roma/Gypsy Cultures in New Perspectives, ed. by Jacobs Fabian and Johannes Ries, 119–133. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Garde, Murray. 2008. “The Pragmatics of Rude Jokes with Grandad: Joking Relationships in Aboriginal Australia.” Anthropological Forum 18 (3): 235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2015. “‘Swear Words’ and ‘Curse Words’ in Australian (and American) English. At the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Edgar A. 2004. “Romani Insults.” Maledicta 131: 73–79.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Contextualization Conventions.” In Sociolinguistics: The Essential Readings, ed. by Christina Bratt Paulston and Richard G. Tuker, 139–155. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena. 2004. “Finnish Maledicta and Euphemisms.” Maledicta 131: 63–72.Google Scholar
Harlan, Lindsey. 1994. “Perfection and Devotion: Sati Tradition in Rajahstan.” In Sati, the Blessing and the Curse: The Burning of Wives in India, ed. by John Stratton Hawley, 79–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David M. 2001. “Muslim Ritual Models in Two Pre-colonial Moroccan Berber Societies: Covenant, Conditional Curse, Shame Compulsion and Sacrifice.” The Journal of North American Studies 6 (2): 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2016. “‘Just kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Teasing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 204–218. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn. 2019. “Strangers and Everyday Incivilities: Towards a Theory of Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(1): 32–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaprow, Miriam L. 1989. “Resisting Respectability: Gypsies in Saragosa.” Urban Anthropology 111: 399–431.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning. 2019. “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression” – A Position Paper. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(1): 6–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitz, Anne Marie. 2004. “An Oath, Its Curse and Anointing Ritual.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 124 (2): 315–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovai, Cecília. 2002. “Az átokról: ‘Cigánybeszéd’ a gömbaljaiak között” [On Curse: Roma Talk in Gömbalja]. Tabula 5 (2): 272–290.Google Scholar
Kratz, Corinne A. 1989. “Genres of Power: A Comparative Analysis of Okiek Blessings, Curses and Oaths.” Man 241: 636–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1997 [1972]. “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, ed. by Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 472–486. London: MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letendre, Joan. 2007. “‘Sugar and Spice but Not Always Nice’: Gender Socialization and Its Impact on Development and Maintenance of Aggression in Adolescent Girls.” Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 24 (4): 353–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. “Contextualizing ‘Contextualization Cues’.” In Language and Interaction, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul Thibault, 32–39. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2002. Romani: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muir, Edward. 2005 [1997]. Ritual in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murano, Francesca. 2012. “The Oscan Cursing Tablets: Binding Formulae, Cursing Typologies and Thematic Classification.” American Journal of Philology 133 (4): 629–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Steven. 1996. “Razzing: Ritualized Uses of Humour as a Form of Identification among American Indians.” In Interaction and Identity, ed. by Hartmut B. Mokros, 237–255. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ramos, Melissa. 2015. “Spoken Word and Ritual Performance: The Oath and Curse in Deuteronomy 27–28.” Doctoral thesis, UCLA. Retrieved from: [URL]
Rampton, Ben. 1995. “Language Crossing and the Problematisation of Ethnicity and Socialisation.” Pragmatics 5 (4): 485–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Réger, Zita. 1999. “Teasing in the Linguistic Socialization of Gypsy Children in Hungary.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 461: 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmani Nodoushan, Mohammad Ali. 2016. “On the Functions of Swearing in Persian.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4 (2): 234–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1986. “Teasing and Shaming in Kaluli Children’s Interactions.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 165–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scotton-Myers, Carol. 1988. “Code-Switching as Indexical of Social Negotiation.” In Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Monica Heller, 151–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Michael S. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Szalai, Andrea. 2010. “Átok, feltételes átok és társadalmi nem erdélyi roma közösségek nyelvi ideológiájában és gyakorlataiban” [Curse, conditional curse and gender in language ideologies and practices of Transylvanian Roma communities]. PhD thesis, Pécs University.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Ideologies of Social Differentiation among Transylvanian Gabor Roma.” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 59 (1): 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “Convention and ritual”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politess ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh an Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Rituals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. London: Transactions.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6 (4): 465–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanci-Osam, Ülker. 1998. “May You Be Shot with Greasy Bullets: Curse Utterances in Turkish.” Asian Folklore Studies 571: 71–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wann, Daniel, and Len Zaichowsky. 2009. “Sport Team Identification and Belief in Team Curses: The Case of the Boston Red Sox and the Curse of the Bambino.” Journal of Sport Behavior 32 (4): 489–502.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weil, Shalva. 1986. “The Language and Ritual of Socialisation: Birthday Parties in a Kindergarten Context.” Man 21 (2): 329–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whutnow, Robert. 1989. Meaning and Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Jia, Mian & Shuting Yao
2022. “Yo I am Superman, You Kiddo Go Home”: ritual impoliteness in Chinese freestyle rap battles. Text & Talk 42:5 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Kontra, Miklós
2022. Hungarian Sociolinguistics in the Carpathian Basin, 1985–2022. Hungarian Studies Yearbook 4:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2022. Teasing. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2021. Alternative Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness: An Introduction. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.