Cover not available
Article published In:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 15–39

The socialisation of interactional rituals

A case study of ritual cursing as a form of teasing in Romani

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

The present paper examines the ways in which ritual cursing operates as a form of teasing in (Gabor) Roma communities. By ‘ritual cursing’ we mean forms of curse that are believed to cause harm to the cursed person or people related to them, i.e. cursing studied here differs from swearing and ‘cussing’, as it embodies supernatural beliefs to a degree. While cursing is an archetype of ritual, to date little pragmatic research has been done on this phenomenon, supposedly due to the scarcity of interactional data collected in cultures where cursing is actively practised; thus, the present paper fills a knowledge gap in the field. We examine cursing in interactions where it is used as teasing in order to socialise young children. Since ritual is a means through which social structures are re-created (Durkheim 1912 [1954/2001]), aiding young language users to acquire rituals is a key aspect of community life. However, little research has been done on the ways in which ritual practices are socialised in communities at the level of interaction, which validates our focus on teasing curses. The phenomenon studied is also relevant to previous sociopragmatic research on teasing: whilst in other (non-ritual) sociocultural settings socialising teasing implies aiding young language users to distinguish between humour and offence, due to the potential harm attributed to ritual cursing its socialisation is centred both on harm and the offence in the conventional sense of the word.

Keywords: cursing, Roma, ritual, socialisation, teasing, harm
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.This study
    • 2.1Objectives
    • 2.2Data and methodology
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Forms of address
    • 3.2False information delivered via interactional ritual chains
    • 3.3Nonverbal contextualisation cues
    • 3.4The ritual contextual frame
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 22 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19017.kad
References (64)
Agyekum, Kofi
1999 “The Pragmatics of duabɔ ‘Grievance Imprecation’ Taboo among the Akan.” Pragmatics 91: 357–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “ Ntam ‘Reminiscential Oath’ Taboo in Akan.” Language in Society 331: 317–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage
1999 “Jeffersons’s Transcript Notation.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworsky and Nicolas Coupland, 158–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel
2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness, and Ritual Display in Early-Modern Dutch Letter Writing.” In Historical (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár, 37–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Berta, Péter
2019 Materializing Difference. Consumer Culture, Politics and Ethnicity among Romanian Roma. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Blount, Ben G., and Elise Padgug
1977 “Prosodic, Paralinguistic, and Interactional Features in Parent–Child Speech: English and Spanish.” Journal of Child Language 4 (1): 67–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1997 Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
2005 “Gender and Language Ideologies.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 447–467. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall
2004 Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croom, Adam
2013 “How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words.” Language & Communication 33 (3): 177–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas
1997 Death, Ritual and Belief: The Rhetoric of Funerary Rites. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
1912 [1954/2001] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
2012 Moral Education. Trans. Everett K. Wilson, and Herman Schnurer. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Eder, Donna
1993 “ ‘Go get ya a French!’: Romantic and Sexual Teasing among Adolescent Girls.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 17–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Ann R.
1986 “Teasing: Verbal Play in Two Mexicano Homes.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emmons, Sally L.
2000 “A Disarming Laughter: The Role of Humor in Tribal Cultures. An Examination of Humor in Contemporary Native American Literature and Art.” Doctoral thesis, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Fosztó, László
2008 “Taking the Oath: Religious Aspects of Moral Personhood among the Romungre.” In Roma/Zigeunerkulturen in neuen Perspektiven. Roma/Gypsy Cultures in New Perspectives, ed. by Jacobs Fabian and Johannes Ries, 119–133. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Garde, Murray
2008 “The Pragmatics of Rude Jokes with Grandad: Joking Relationships in Aboriginal Australia.” Anthropological Forum 18 (3): 235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip
2003 Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2015 “ ‘Swear Words’ and ‘Curse Words’ in Australian (and American) English. At the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Edgar A.
2004 “Romani Insults.” Maledicta 131: 73–79.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Contextualization Conventions.” In Sociolinguistics: The Essential Readings, ed. by Christina Bratt Paulston and Richard G. Tuker, 139–155. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena
2004 “Finnish Maledicta and Euphemisms.” Maledicta 131: 63–72.Google Scholar
Harlan, Lindsey
1994 “Perfection and Devotion: Sati Tradition in Rajahstan.” In Sati, the Blessing and the Curse: The Burning of Wives in India, ed. by John Stratton Hawley, 79–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David M.
2001 “Muslim Ritual Models in Two Pre-colonial Moroccan Berber Societies: Covenant, Conditional Curse, Shame Compulsion and Sacrifice.” The Journal of North American Studies 6 (2): 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2016 “ ‘Just kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Teasing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 204–218. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn
2019 “Strangers and Everyday Incivilities: Towards a Theory of Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(1): 32–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaprow, Miriam L.
1989 “Resisting Respectability: Gypsies in Saragosa.” Urban Anthropology 111: 399–431.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z.
2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression” – A Position Paper. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(1): 6–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitz, Anne Marie
2004 “An Oath, Its Curse and Anointing Ritual.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 124 (2): 315–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovai, Cecília
2002 “Az átokról: ‘Cigánybeszéd’ a gömbaljaiak között” [On Curse: Roma Talk in Gömbalja]. Tabula 5 (2): 272–290.Google Scholar
Kratz, Corinne A.
1989 “Genres of Power: A Comparative Analysis of Okiek Blessings, Curses and Oaths.” Man 241: 636–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1997 [1972] “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, ed. by Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, 472–486. London: MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letendre, Joan
2007 “ ‘Sugar and Spice but Not Always Nice’: Gender Socialization and Its Impact on Development and Maintenance of Aggression in Adolescent Girls.” Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 24 (4): 353–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003 “Contextualizing ‘Contextualization Cues’.” In Language and Interaction, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul Thibault, 32–39. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2002 Romani: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muir, Edward
2005 [1997] Ritual in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murano, Francesca
2012 “The Oscan Cursing Tablets: Binding Formulae, Cursing Typologies and Thematic Classification.” American Journal of Philology 133 (4): 629–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Steven
1996 “Razzing: Ritualized Uses of Humour as a Form of Identification among American Indians.” In Interaction and Identity, ed. by Hartmut B. Mokros, 237–255. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ramos, Melissa
2015 “Spoken Word and Ritual Performance: The Oath and Curse in Deuteronomy 27–28.” Doctoral thesis, UCLA. Retrieved from: [URL]
Rampton, Ben
1995 “Language Crossing and the Problematisation of Ethnicity and Socialisation.” Pragmatics 5 (4): 485–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Réger, Zita
1999 “Teasing in the Linguistic Socialization of Gypsy Children in Hungary.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 461: 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmani Nodoushan, Mohammad Ali
2016 “On the Functions of Swearing in Persian.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4 (2): 234–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B.
1986 “Teasing and Shaming in Kaluli Children’s Interactions.” In Language Socialization across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 165–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scotton-Myers, Carol
1988 “Code-Switching as Indexical of Social Negotiation.” In Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Monica Heller, 151–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Michael S.
1997 The Time of the Gypsies. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Szalai, Andrea
2010 “Átok, feltételes átok és társadalmi nem erdélyi roma közösségek nyelvi ideológiájában és gyakorlataiban” [Curse, conditional curse and gender in language ideologies and practices of Transylvanian Roma communities]. PhD thesis, Pécs University.Google Scholar
2014 “Ideologies of Social Differentiation among Transylvanian Gabor Roma.” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 59 (1): 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2017 “Convention and ritual”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politess ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh an Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor
1967 The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Rituals. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. London: Transactions.Google Scholar
1979 “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6 (4): 465–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanci-Osam, Ülker
1998 “May You Be Shot with Greasy Bullets: Curse Utterances in Turkish.” Asian Folklore Studies 571: 71–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wann, Daniel, and Len Zaichowsky
2009 “Sport Team Identification and Belief in Team Curses: The Case of the Boston Red Sox and the Curse of the Bambino.” Journal of Sport Behavior 32 (4): 489–502.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weil, Shalva
1986 “The Language and Ritual of Socialisation: Birthday Parties in a Kindergarten Context.” Man 21 (2): 329–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whutnow, Robert
1989 Meaning and Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by 6 other publications

Jia, Mian & Shuting Yao
2022. “Yo I am Superman, You Kiddo Go Home”: ritual impoliteness in Chinese freestyle rap battles. Text & Talk 42:5 ► pp. 691 ff. DOI logo
Kontra, Miklós
2022. Hungarian Sociolinguistics in the Carpathian Basin, 1985–2022. Hungarian Studies Yearbook 4:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2022. Teasing. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2021. Alternative Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness: An Introduction. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.