Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 142168


Ritual frames


Agha, Asif
2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2014 “Pragmatic Borrowing.” Journal of Pragmatics 67: 17–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence
1992 “Frames, Concepts and Conceptual Fields.” In Frames, Fields and Contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer, and Eva Feder Kittay, 21–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel
2010 “Rituals.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 483–521. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2005 “Frames Revisited: The Coherence-Inducing Function of Frames.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 685–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike
1988Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall
2004Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1981 “Conversational Routine.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 1–18. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (12): 3232–3245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Jin-huei
2007 “Love You” Doesn’t Mean “I Love You”: Just a Way to Say Goodbye. The Nature of Leave-taking and its Pragmatic Applications in Mandarin Chinese. In 2007 Selected Papers from Pragmatics in the CJK Classroom: The State of the Art, ed. by Dina R. Yoshimi and Haidan Wang. Retrieved from: http://​nflrc​.hawaii​.edu​/CJKProceedings
Edmondson, Willis
1985 “Discourse Worlds in the Classroom and in Foreign Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7 (2): 159–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Gleason, Jean Berko, Rivka Y. Perlmann, and Esther Blank Greif
1984 “What’s the Magic Word: Learning Language through Politeness Routines.” Discourse Processes 7 (4): 493–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
1995 “Pragmatics and Power.” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (2): 117–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
1989 “Politeness in English and German: The Functions of Please and Bitte.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House, and Gabriel Kasper, 96–119. Norwood, N.J.Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper
1981 “Politeness Markers in English and German.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 157–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2/3): 223–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David
2009Spectacle and Sacrifice: The Ritual Foundations of Village Life in North China. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House
2020Evaluating the Appropriacy of Using Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs) – A case study of learners of Chinese and English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Contrastive Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Puyu Ning, and Yongping Ran
2018 “Public Ritual Apology – A Case Study of Chinese.” Discourse, Context and Media 26: 21–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, Zohar
2009 “Public (non-) Apologies: The Discourse of Minimizing Responsibility.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2257–2270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2016 “Situation-bound Utterances in Chinese. East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1): 107–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1972 “Language in Context.” Language 48 (4): 907–927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Talking Power: The Politics of Language. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei
1994 “Qing/Please – A Polite or Requestive Marker? Observations from Chinese.” Multilingua 13 (4): 343–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17 (5/6): 365–399.Google Scholar
Ma, Naitian
2003 “试说兼语结构与“请”” [A tentative study on concurrent structure and the usage of the word ‘Please’]. Journal of Henan Institute of Technology 22 (4): 78–80.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1935Coral Gardens and Their Magic: A Study of the Methods of Tilling the Soil and Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands. Hamburg: Servus.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel
1954The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. English translation by W. D. Halls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara
2003 “Re-examining Politeness, Face and the Japanese Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10/11): 1471–1506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant
2014 “Activity Types, Discourse Types and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counselling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger, and Robert Abelson
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaim, and Pascale Fung
2013Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
(ed.) 2000Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1979 “What’s in a Frame? Service Evidence for Underlaying Expectations. In New Directions in Discourse Processing, ed. by Roy Friedl, 14–56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Maria
2005 “Beyond the Micro-Level of Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 237–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Puzzle of Indirect Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2861–2865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor
1979 “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6 (4): 465–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Mulken, Margot
1996 “Politeness Markers in French and Dutch Requests.” Language Sciences 18 (3/4): 689–702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2004 “The Intonation of Please-Requests: A Corpus-Based Study.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (9): 1521–1549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woodfield, Helen, and Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis
2010 “ ‘I just need more time’: A Study of Native and Non-Native Students’ Requests to Faculty for an Extension.” Multilingua 29 (1): 77–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. T/V pronouns in global communication practices: The case of IKEA catalogues across linguacultures. Journal of Pragmatics 161  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. German and Japanese war crime apologies: A contrastive pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics 177  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Zhuo Bi
2021. Altered speech act indication: A problem for foreign language learners?. System 101  pp. 102554 ff. Crossref logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu, Shiyu Liu, Wenrui Shi, Zongfeng Xia & Lin Jiao
2021. Interaction, speech acts and ritual: An integrative model. Lingua 257  pp. 103082 ff. Crossref logo
Jia, Mian & Guoping Yang
2021. Emancipating Chinese (im)politeness research: Looking back and looking forward. Lingua 251  pp. 103028 ff. Crossref logo
Kampf, Zohar
2021. Political speech acts in contrast: The case of calls to condemn in news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 180  pp. 203 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2020. Review of Freytag (2020): Exploring Politeness in Business Emails: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Pragmatics and Society 11:4  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 179  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Ritual frames and mimesis: Analysing military training in Chinese universities. Language & Communication 80  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. ‘Politeness Markers’ Revisited - A Contrastive Pragmatic Perspective. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Yulong Song
2021. Admonishing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:2  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Ling Zhou
2021.  Self-Denigration in 21st Century Chinese . Journal of Politeness Research 17:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Fengguang, Dan Han, Dániel Z. Kádár & Juliane House
2021. The expressions ‘(M)minzu-zhuyi’ and ‘Nationalism’: A contrastive pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 174  pp. 168 ff. Crossref logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1  pp. 40 ff. Crossref logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Ying Tong & Francisco Yus
2020. Bonding across Chinese social media. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:3  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.