Cover not available
Article published In:
The Pragmatics of Ritual
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
[Pragmatics 30:1] 2020
► pp. 88–115

“By the elders’ leave, I do”

Rituals, ostensivity and perceptions of the moral order in Iranian Tehrani marriage ceremonies

ORCID logo | Independent researcher
The basis of this study is the view that social ritual practices embody and reinforce the moral order of communities. It takes a step towards providing more empirical research on the ritual practices in lesser studied languages by examining ethnographic data collected during marriage ceremonies in Tehran. Extracts taken from marriage ceremonies and a film extract are examined in terms of recurrence, liminality, embodiment of the moral order and emotivity, elements identified in Kádár’s definition of ritual (2017). The paper makes a theoretical contribution by showing that ostensivity can also be considered an important facet of ritual. In ritual practices connected with marriage, ostensivity is experienced by participants and observers as a means of maintaining the moral order. The paper proposes future areas of research for the theoretical refinement of the concept of ostensivity and further examination of the relationship that ostensivity has with ta’arof (Iranian ritual politeness) and face.
Keywords: ritual, ostensivity, Iranian marriage ceremonies, wedding ceremonies, Iranian ritual politeness (ta’arof), face
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Brief overview
    • 1.2Previous research
    • 1.3Iranian marriage rituals
  • 2.Objectives of this study
  • 3.Methodology and data collection
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1‘Exchange of promise to marry’ (baleh-boroon) ceremonies
      • 4.1.1Interpretation of the ceremonies of “exchange of promise to marry”
    • 4.2Official wedding ceremonies (‘aqd)
      • 4.2.1Interpretation of official wedding ceremonies
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 18 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19021.kou
References (31)
References
Asdjoodi, Minoo. 2001. “A Comparison Between Ta’arof in Persian and Limao in Chinese.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1481: 71–92.Google Scholar
Assadi, Reza. 1980. “Deference: Persian Style.” Anthropological Linguistics 221: 221–224.Google Scholar
Beeman, William O. 1986. Language, Status and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bucar, Elizabeth M. 2012. “Saving Face: Navigating Landmines with Ritual Politeness.” History of Religions 52 (1): 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interactional Ritual Chains. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1912 [1954/2001]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Trans. by Carol Cosman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
. 1972. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” In Communication in Face-to-Face Interaction, ed. by J. Laver, and S. Hutcheson, 319–346. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. 1957. “Some Aspects of Persian Style.” Language 331: 355–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Risako. 1998. “‘Sorry for your Kindness’: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 509–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 81: 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahangiri, Nader. 1980. “A Sociolinguistic Study of Tehrani Persian.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, David I. 1988. Ritual, Politics and Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koutlaki, Sofia A. 1997. “The Persian System of Politeness and the Persian Folk Concept of Face, with Some Reference to EFL Teaching to Iranian Native Speakers.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff.Google Scholar
2002. “Offers and Expressions of Thanks as Face Enhancing Acts: Ta’arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1733–1756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. “Two Sides of the Same Coin: How the Notion of ‘Face’ is Encoded in Persian Communication.” In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh, 115–133. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Andreas Langlotz. 2008. “Relational Work at the Intersection of Cognition, Interaction and Emotion”. Bulletin vals-asla, bulletin Suisse de la linguistique appliquee. 881: 165–91.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages” In C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Oxford: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Politeness and Conversational Universals – Observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8: (2/3), 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2008. “Linguistic Rituals for Thanking in Japanese: Balancing Obligations.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2150–2174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Thanking and Politeness in Japanese: Balancing Acts in Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter, and Eileen Basso. 2009. Ritual Communication. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul Beekman. 1994. “Repetition as Cure in Native American story: Silko’s Ceremony and Momaday’s The Ancient Child .” SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 71: 221–42.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar
Whuthnow, Robert. 1989. Meaning and Moral Order. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bagheri, Roghie, Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz, Mahshid Foroughan & Farahnaz Mohammadi Shahboulaghi
2024. Women’s Sexual Health in Old Age: Identification of Influencing Factors Using Focus Group Interviews Based on Socioecological Approach. Sexuality and Disability 42:2 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Cang, He, Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Dániel Z. Kádár
2024. Sympathising with patients in historical China: an interaction ritual approach. Language Sciences 106 ► pp. 101665 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Wenrui Shi
2023. Historical language use in Europe from a contrastive pragmatic perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Shanneik, Yafa
2023. Making Fatima’s Presence Visible: Embodied Practices, Shiʿi Aesthetics and Socio-Religious Transformations in Iran. Material Religion 19:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui
2022.  Keqi (客气) in historical Chinese: evidence from metapragmatic comments. Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Fengguang Liu, Juliane House & Wenrui Shi
2020. Reporting ritual political advice in the Chinese state media: A study of the National People’s Congress. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100388 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.