Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:1 (2021) ► pp. 87113
References

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis
1998Deutsche Jugendsprache. Untersuchungen zu ihren Strukturen und Funktionen. [German youth language. Investigations of its structures and functions.] Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1996 “The Pre-front Field Position in Spoken German and its Relevance as a Grammaticalization Position.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 295–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 25 (1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Jan Lindström
2016 “Left/right Asymmetries and the Grammar of Pre- vs. Post-positioning in German and Swedish Talk-in-interaction.” Language Sciences 56: 68–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Anja Stukenbrock
2018 “When ‘you’ means ‘I’: The German 2nd Ps.Sg. Pronoun du between Genericity and Subjectivity.” Open Linguistics 4: 280–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. [Problems in general linguistics]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg
1990 “On the Local Sensitivity of Conversation.” In The Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Markovà, and Klaus Foppa, 201–226. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O.
1991 “The Multiple Uses of the Second Singular Pronoun ni in Conversational Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 929–957.Google Scholar
Bladas, Òscar, and Neus Nogué
2016 “ ‘Que bé tu!’: An Emerging Emphatic Use of the Second Person Singular Pronoun tu (you) in Spoken Catalan.” Pragmatics 26 (3): 473–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman
1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934/1965Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. [Language theory. The representational function of language.] Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby, and Michael Emmison
2011 “Address Terms in Turn Beginnings: Managing Disalignment and Disaffiliation in Telephone Counseling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (4): 338–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
2010 “Address Terms in the Service of Other Actions: The Case of News Interview Talk.” Discourse & Communication 4 (2): 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Address Terms in the Organization of Turns at Talk: The Case of Pivotal Turn Extensions.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1853–1867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 57: 290–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
2009Language and Human Relations. Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2004 “Prosody and Sequence Organization in English Conversation. The Case of New Beginnings.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 335–376. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Relatedness and Timing in Talk-in-interaction.” In Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Nicole Dehé, and Anne Wichmann, 257–276. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2017Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d’Avis, Franz, and Jörg Meibauer
2013 “Du Idiot! Din idiot! Pseudo-vocative Constructions and Insults in German (and Swedish).” In Vocative! Addressing between System and Performance, ed. by Barbara Sonnenhauser, and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna, 189–217. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2013 “Turn-design at Turn-beginnings: Multimodal Resources to Deal with Tasks of Turn-construction in German.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner
2015 “Introduction: Temporality in Interaction.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günthner, 1–26. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck
(eds.) 2018Time in Embodied Interaction. Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Droste, Pepe
2018Korpus ‚Multimodale Interaktion‘ [Corpus ‘multimodal interaction’]. University of Münster.Google Scholar
Droste, Pepe, and Susanne Günthner
2020 “‚das mAchst du bestimmt AUCH du;‘: Zum Zusammenspiel syntaktischer, prosodischer und sequenzieller Aspekte syntaktisch desintegrierter du-Formate. [‘das mAchst du bestimmt AUCH du;’: On the interplay of syntactic, prosodic and sequential aspects syntactically disintegrated formats of du.]” In Prosodie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. [Construction Grammar and Prosody], ed. by Wolfgang Imo, and Jens Philipp Lanwer, 75–110. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin
1963Behavior in Public Places. Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1971Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of Mutual Gaze at Turn-beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 272–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Conversational Organization. Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
2004 “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
2016 “Praktiken erhöhter Dialogizität: onymische Anredeformen als Gesten personifizierter Zuwendung. [Practices of increased dialogism: Onymic forms of address as gestures of personified other-orientation.]” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 44 (3): 406–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Namentliche Anreden in onkologischen Aufklärungsgesprächen: eine interaktional ausgerichtete Studie zu Formen und Funktionen onymischer Anreden. [Onymic address in oncologic briefings: An interactional-oriented study of the forms and functions of onymic address.]” Arbeitspapiere Sprache und Interaktion (SpIn) 82.Google Scholar
Hewitt, John P., and Stokes, Randall
1975 “Disclaimers.” American Sociological Review 40 (1): 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2003 “The German Address System: Binary and Scalar at once.” In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Andreas H. Jucker, 401–425. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1957/1971 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb”. In Selected Writings, Vol. 2, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1923Language. Its Nature, Development, and Origin. New York: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1990Conducting Interaction. Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kretzenbacher, Heinz L.
1991 “Vom Sie zum Du – und retour? [From Sie to Du – and back?]” In Vom Sie zum Du – mehr als eine neue Konvention? [From Sie to Du – More than a new convention?], ed. by Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, and Wulf Segebrecht, 9–78. Hamburg/Zürich: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
2010 “‚Man ordnet ja bestimmte Leute irgendwo ein für sich…‘ Anrede und soziale Deixis. [‘Man ordnet ja bestimmte Leute irgendwo ein für sich…’ Address and social deixis.]” Deutsche Sprache 38: 1–18.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1996 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 281–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-sensitive Operation of a Context-free Organization.” Language in Society 32 (2): 177–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebscher, Grit, Jennifer Dailey-O’Cain, Mareike Müller, and Tetyana Reichert
2010 “Negotiating Identities through Pronouns of Address in an Immigrant Community.” Pragmatics 20 (3): 375–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2013Affiliation in Conversation. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan
2014 “On the Place of Turn and Sequence in Grammar. Verb-first Clausal Constructions in Swedish Talk-in-interaction.” Pragmatics 24 (3): 507–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1977–1997. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-taking in Institutional Multi-party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46, 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Interactional Space and the Study of Embodied Talk-in-interaction.” In Space in Language and Linguistics. Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, 247–275. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” In Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristian
2009 “Establishing Recipiency in Pre-beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom.” Discourse Processes 46 (5): 491–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young
2007 “Overt Reference to Speaker and Recipient in Korean.” Discourse Studies 9 (4): 462–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase
2016 “Linguistic Reference in the Negotiation of Identity and Action: Revisiting the T/V Distinction.” Language 92 (3): 636–670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007 “ ‘Catherine, you’re Wasting your Time’: Address Terms within the Australian Political Interview.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1503–1525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Address Terms in the Australian Political News Interview.” In Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability, ed. by Mats Ekström, and Marianna Patrona, 93–111. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann
1973The Structures of the Life-World. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schwitalla, Johannes
1995 “Namen in Gesprächen. [Names in conversations.]” In Namenforschung. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Onomastik [Onomastics. An international handbook on onomastics], ed. by Ernst Eichler, Gerold Hilty, Heinrich Löffler, Hugo Steger, and Ladislav Zgusta, 498–504. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 “Kommunikative Funktionen von Sprecher- und Adressatennamen in Gesprächen. [Communicative functions of names of speakers and addressees in conversations.]” In Eigennamen in der gesprochenen Sprache [Proper names in spoken language], ed. by Nicolas Pepin, and Elwys De Stefani, 197–199. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret et al.
2011 “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst
2003 “From Pragmatics to Grammar: Tracing the Development of ‘Respect’ in the History of the German Pronouns of Address.” In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Andreas H. Jucker, 85–123. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J.
1981 “Children’s Use of Address Terms.” In Adult–Child Conversations, ed. by Peter French, and Margaret Maclure, 142–158. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann, and Bruno Strecker
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. [Grammar of German language.] Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar