Rapport management in Thai and Japanese social talk during group discussions
According to Hofstede’s (2003) often quoted survey, Japanese and Thai cultures rank high on the collectivist scale and both cultures attach the greatest importance to group harmony. Accordingly, we should see similar characteristics in Japanese and Thai speakers during discussions within their respective social groups. However, this is not the case. This paper examines social talk during the task-oriented interaction of Japanese and Thai speakers. The analysis focuses on how the speakers of Japanese and Thai present themselves and construct rapport in casual group talk. Using the concept of consciousness deployed in ‘idea units’ (Chafe 1980, 1994) and some semantic considerations, I identify three major differences in rapport construction between Japanese and Thai speakers. First, Japanese participants prefer to build common ground through discussion of communal topics and through dealing with the comprehensiveness and the orderliness of the situation, whereas Thai participants incline toward Individual-oriented topics and independent styles of talk. Second, the Japanese show a preference for using softening devices and conventionalized expressions in group discussion while the Thais tend to use intensifiers and spontaneous expressions to indicate involvement and create a friendly and fun atmosphere. Third, the Japanese like to demonstrate the minimization of self and the relevancy between the self and the collective whereas the Thais value the capitalization of the self and the strengthening of personal relationships. Japanese and Thai communicative styles can be viewed as reflection of the different way the two cultures conceptualize the notion of rapport and the self. With regard to the component of rapport management (Spencer-Oatey 2000), the Japanese place more emphasis on the observation of sociality rights, while the Thais incline toward the management of face. This suggests that rapport construction in collectivist cultures may possess totally different characters.
Keywords: Japanese, Communicative styles, Rapport, Thai, Social talk, Group discussion
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2010
Bales, Robert F.
Barnlund, Dean C.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1980) The deployment of consciousness. In W. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production.Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 9-50. BoP
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. BoP
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade
(1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell. BoP
Embree, John F.
Gumperz, John J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(2003) Geert Hofstede™ cultural dimensions. 19 Nov 2009 http://www.geert-hofstede.com/.
(2002) Conflict management in Japanese public affairs talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 573-608. BoP
Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Preeya Ingkaphirom Horie
Markus, Hazel R., and Shinobu Kitayama
Maynard, Senko K.
(2009) <http://www.oknation.net/blog/teammediamonitor/2009/05/07/entry-1 (accessed 19 November 2009)
(2005) Negotiation of contingent talk: The Japanese interactional particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
National News Bureau
(2009) <http://thainews.prd.go.th/previewnews.php?tb=NEWS&m_newsid=255207090145 (accessed 19 November 2009)
(2008) Gōi keisei kaiwa de hyōshutsu suru serufu to ba no riron-kakunin. Proceedings of the 21st Japanese association of sociolinguistic sciences, March 22-23. Tokyo Woman’s Christian University, Japan, pp. 76-79.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
(2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. New York: Continuum, pp. 11-45. BoP
Straehle, Carolyn A.
(1984) Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Young, Linda W.L.
(1971) A study of Japanese modality - A performative analysis of sentence particles. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan.
(2009) kaan chái phaasǎa sadɛɛŋ khwaam runrɛɛŋ nai phâat huǎ kaaw aachayaakam nai nǎŋsɯ̌ɯphim raai wan. http://www.human.cmu.ac.th/~thai/sompong/res_kalaya1.doc (accessed 19 November 2009)
Cited by 4 other publications
Akkawanitcha, Chuanchuen & Paul G. Patterson
Omotunde, Samuel Adebayo & Olumide Ogunrotimi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.