Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 31:3 (2021) ► pp.382–405
Taking it too far
The role of ideological discourses in contesting the limits of teasing and offence
While teasing can cause offence, participants on television variety or game shows are generally expected to tolerate it. In this paper, we examine comments posted on YouTube in response to reports of a leaked recording of a television host in Taiwan swearing at and insulting a guest who teased the host about his “inability to take a defeat”. In so doing, we examine both the perceived limits of teasing (i.e. what is considered allowable and what goes too far), and the perceived limits of taking offence in response to teasing (i.e. what ways of indicating offence are considered allowable and what goes too far). We conclude that instances where there are disputes about whether taking offence is warranted by the teasing in question provides us with a useful lens to examine the role ideological discourses play in (re-)constituting the underlying moral fabric of social interaction.
Keywords: teasing, offence, morality, metapragmatics, broadcast media, digitally-mediated communication, Mandarin Chinese
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Teasing, offence and morality
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Analytical approach
- 4.The role of ideological discourses in construing teasing and the taking of offence as moral breaches
- 4.1Discourses about intergenerational discord
- 4.2Discourses about moral character
- 4.3Discourses on moral culpability
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Bergmann, Jörg R.
1998 “Introduction: Morality in Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 279–294.
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher
2014 “Doing Sociolinguistic Research on Computer-Mediated Data: A Review of Four Methodological Issues.” Discourse, Context and Media 31:14–26. 
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731:19–36.
Charmaz, Kathy
2000 “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 509–535. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link
.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1):35–72.
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Oliver Holmes
2013 (Im)politeness and Exploitative TV in Britain and North America: The X-Factor and American Idol
. In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action, edited by Nuria Lorenzo-Dus and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 169–198. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, Bethan
2018 “Evaluating Evaluations: What Different Types of Metapragmatic Behaviour Can Tell Us About Participants’ Understandings of the Moral Order.” Journal of Politeness Research 14 (1):121–151.
Drew, Paul
1987 “Po-faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics 251:219–253.
Dynel, Marta
2014 “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 731:37–52.
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Glasser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss
1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Günthner, Susanne
1995 “Exemplary Stories: The Cooperative Construction of Moral Indignation.” Versus 70/711:147–175.
Gruber, Helmut
Haugh, Michael
2015 “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 861:36–42.
2016 “ ‘Just kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951:120–136.
2018 “Theorising (Im)politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 14(1):153–165.
Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2019 “ ‘The Apology Seemed (In)sincere’: Variability in Perceptions of (Im)politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 1421:207–222.
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
2018 “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy.” Discourse Studies 20 (2):246–269.
Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
2019 “Offence and Conflict Talk.” In Handbook of Language in Conflict, edited by Jim O’Driscoll and Lesley Jeffries, 196–214. London: Routledge.
Haidt, Jonathan, and Selin Kesebir
2010 “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology (5th edn), edited by Susan Fiske, Dan Gilbert and Lindzey Gardner, 797–852. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Huang, Chun-chieh
2014 Taiwan in Transformation. Retrospect and Prospect (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
Jayyusi, Lena
1991 “Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order.” In Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, edited by Graham Button, 227–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel
2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2020 Capturing Injunctive Norms in Pragmatics: Meta-Reflective Evaluations and the Moral Order. Lingua 2371: 102814.
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel, Puyu Ning, and Yongping Ran
2018 “Public Ritual Apology – A Case Study of Chinese.” Discourse, Context & Media 261:21–31.
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Maria Stopfner
2017 “Ideology and (Im)politeness.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Daniel Kadar, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
2009 “ ‘You’re Barking Mad, I’m Out’: Impoliteness and Broadcast Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2):159–187.
Luckmann, Thomas
1995 “On the Intersubjective Constitution of Morals”. In The Prism of the Self, edited by Steven G. Crowell, 73–91. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2017 English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi
2018 “Impoliteness, Aggression and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321:91–107.
Pillet-Shore, Danielle
2016 “Criticizing Another’s Child: How Teachers Evaluate Students During Parent-Teacher Conferences.” Language in Society 45 (1):33–58.
Rawls, Anne Warfield
2010 “Social Order as Moral Order.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by Steven Hitlin and Stephen Vaisey, 91–121. NY: Springer.
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2017a “What Makes Teasing Impolite in Australian and British English? ‘Step[ping] Over Those Lines […] You Shouldn’t Be Crossing’.” Journal of Politeness Research 13 (2):175–207.
2017b “ ‘Everything He Says to Me It’s Like He Stabs Me in the Face’: Frontstage and Backstage Reactions to Teasing.” In Multiple Perspectives on Language Play, edited by Nancy Bell, 169–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2016 “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1 (1):73–106.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Jianyu Xing
2019 “Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Interpersonal Relations and the Evaluation Process: Culture, Norms, and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1511:141–154.
Su, Hsi-Yao
2019 “The Metapragmatics of Taiwanese (Im)politeness: Conceptualisation and Evaluation of Limao
.” Journal of Pragmatics 1481:26–43.
Taiwan Network Information Centre
2019 Taiwan Internet Report 2019. Taipei: TWNIC.
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2016 “Why do People Take Offence? Exploring the Underlying Expectations.” Journal of Pragmatics 1011:1–17.
Verschueren, Jef
2012 Ideology in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yu, Ning
2016 “Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective from Chinese.” Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2):108–125.