Aoki, Paul M., Margaret H. Szymanski, and Allison Woodruff
2006 “Media Spaces in the Mobile World.” CSCW: 1–5.Google Scholar
Arminen, Ilkka, and Minna Leinonen
2006 “Mobile Phone Call Openings: Tailoring Answers to Personalized Summonses.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arminen, Ilkka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli
2016 “Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (4): 290–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte
2002Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation. Analysen deutsch-dänischer Verhandlungen [Structural markers of disagreement in intercultural communication. Analysis of German-Danish business meetings]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Brite
2015 “Multimodal Perspectives on Meeting Interaction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, ed. by Joseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg, 277–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
2009 “Meeting Talk: An Introduction.” Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte
2007 “What Do People Expect from Public Services? Requests in Public Service Encounters.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 381: 66–83.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Mick A., Edward C. Cuff, and John R. E. Lee
1978 “The Recommencement of a Meeting as a Member’s Accomplishment.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 133–153. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beers Fägersten, Kristy, Elin Holmsten, and Una Cunningham
2010 “Multimodal Communication and Meta-Modal Discourse.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 145–163. Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boden, Deirdre
1994The Business of Talk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bruxelles, Sylvie, Luca Greco, and Lorenza Mondada
2009 “Pratiques de transition: ressources multimodales pour la structuration de l’activité.” In Méthodologies d’analyse de situations coopératives de conception: corpus MOSAIC, ed. by Françoise Détienne, and Véroniche Traverso, 221–301. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar
Caspi, Aviv
2020 “Punctuality and Coordination Failures in the Remote Workplace.” Available at SSRN: [URL] or DOI logo
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawidowicz, Marta, Karen Schramm, Roberta Abbate, Doris Abitzsch, Ilona Feld-Knapp, Katrin Hofmann, Sabine Hoffmann, Gabriella Perge, and Ewout van der Knaap
2019 “Erfahrungsbasiertheit, kollegiale Kooperation und videobasierte Reflexion als Prinzipien des LEELULehrerInnenbildungsprojekts.” [URL]
Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1700–1718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Kobin H. Kendrick
2018 “Searching for Trouble: Recruiting Assistance through Embodied Action.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 1 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Due, Brian L., and Christian Licoppe
2020 “Video-Mediated Interaction (VMI): Introduction to a Special Issue on the Multimodal Accomplishment of VMI Institutional Activities.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies in Human Sociality 3 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar
2021 “Video-Mediated Interaction (VMI).” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria
1997 “Schisming: The Collaborative Transformation from a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (1): 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Martínez, Esther, and Marcelo Giglio
2020 “Introduire les points soumis à discussion lors d’une réunion. Une analyse conversationnelle longitudinale.” Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique 721: 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1963Behavior in Public Places. New York, The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Harper, Richard, Rod Watson, and Christian Licoppe
2017 “Interpersonal Video Communication as a Site of Human Sociality. A Special Issue of Pragmatics.” Pragmatics 27 (3): 319–350.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placemen.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper
1981 “Politeness Markers in English and German.” In Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, Vol. 21, 157–185. The Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilomäki, Sakari, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2020 “From Appearings to Disengagements: Openings and Closings in Video-Mediated Tele-Homecare Encounters.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 3 (3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina., Mirka Rauniomaa, and Pentti Haddington
2014 “Suspending Action.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 109–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H.
2021 “The ‘Other’ Side of Recruitment: Methods of Assistance in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1781: 68–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2014 “The Putative Preference for Offers over Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale, and Joseph A. Allen
2020 “Well, Now What Do We Do? Wait…: A Group Process Analysis of Meeting Lateness.” International Journal of Business Communication 57 (3): 302–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, and Sylvaine Tuncer
2014 “Attending to a Summons and Putting Other Activities ‘On Hold’.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 167–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, and Julian Morel
2012 “Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (2): 399–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian
2017a “Showing Objects in Skype Video-Mediated Conversations: From Showing Gestures to Showing Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 1101: 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b “Skype Appearances, Multiple Greetings and ‘Coucou’. The Sequential Organization of Video-Mediated Conversation Openings.” Pragmatics 27 (3): 351–386.Google Scholar
Lindstrøm, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action. A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markman, Kris M.
2009 “ʽSo What Shall We Talk Aboutʼ: Openings and Closings in Chat-Based Virtual Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 150–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehus, Siri
2005 “The Micro-Organization of Taking a Break: Transitions Between Task and Non-Task Activities at Work.” Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, April 16–18, Texas, Linguistic Forum 481: 125–137.
Mlynář, Jakub, Esther González-Martínez, and Denis Lalanne
2018 “Situated Organization of Video-Mediated Interaction: A Review of Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Studies.” Interacting with Computers 30 (2): 73–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1977–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities Within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 21 (2): 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Ways of ‘Doing Being Plurilingual’ in International Work Meetings.” In Second Language Conversation, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 27–60. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, and Reinhold Schmitt
2010 “Zur Multimodalität von Situationseröffnungen.” In Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by Lorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2010 “Eröffnungen und Prä-Eröffnungen in medienvermittelter Interaktion: das Beispiel Videokonferenzen.” In Situationseröffnungen. Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by Lorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt, 277–334. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Arantxa Santos
2016 “Attending Multi-Party Videoconference Meetings: The Initial Problem.” Language@Internet 131, article 3. Google Scholar
Nielsen, Mie Femø
2013 “ʽStepping Stonesʼ in Opening and Closing Department Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication 50 (1): 34–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oittinen, Tuire, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
2015 “Openings in Technology-Mediated Business Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 47–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oittinen, Tuire
2018 “Multimodal Accomplishment of Alignment and Affiliation in the Local Space of Distant Meetings.” Culture and Organization 24 (1): 31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oloff, Florence
2019 “Some Systematic Aspects of Self-Initiated Mobile Device Use in Face-to-Face Encounters.” Journal für Medienlinguistik 2 (2): 195–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raclaw, Joshua, and Cecilia E. Ford
2015 “Meetings as Interactional Achievements: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” In The Science of Meetings at Work: The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, ed. by Joseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen Hougaard, Gitte
2008 “Membership Categorization in International Business Phonecalls: The Importance of ‘Being International’.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (2): 307–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Relieu, Marc
2009 “ʽMobile Phone Workʼ: Disengaging and Engaging Mobile Phone Activities with Concurrent Activities.” In The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices, ed. by Rich Ling, and Scott W. Campbell, 215–229. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenbaun, Laura, Sheizaf Rafaeli, and Dennis Kurzon
2016 “Blurring the Boundaries between Domestic and Digital Spheres: Competing Engagements in Public Google Hangouts.” Pragmatics 261: 291–314.Google Scholar
Ruhleder, Karen, and Brigitte Jordan
2001 “Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay-Generated Trouble.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 101: 113–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oshima, Sae, and Birte Asmuß
2018 “Mediated Business: Living the Organizational Surroundings – Introduction.” Culture and Organization 24:1: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold
2006 “Interaction in Work Meetings.” Revue française de linguistique appliquée 11 (2): 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogelberg, Steven G., Clifton W. Scott, Brett Agypt, Jason Williams, John E. Kello, Tracy McCausland, and Jessi L. Olien
2014 “Lateness to Meetings: Examination of an Unexplored Temporal Phenomenon.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23 (2): 323–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutinen, Marike
2014 “Negotiating Favourable Conditions for Resuming Suspended Activities.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 137–165. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
2012 “Interaction in Workplace Meetings.” Discourse Studies 14 (1): 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Exploring Leadership Conversations.” Management Communication Quartely 21 (4): 529–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenning, Jan, and John E. Ruchinskas
1984 “Organizational Teleconferencing.” In The New Media. The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, ed. by Ronald E. Rice, 217–248. Beverly Hills/CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Szymanski, Margaret H.
1999 “Re-Engaging and Dis-Engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society 28 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veyrier, Claire Antoine
2015 “Multiactivité et multimodalité dans les réunions à distance.” Reseaux (6): 11–37.Google Scholar
Wasson, Christina
2006 “Being in Two Spaces at Once: Virtual Meetings and Their Representation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16 (1): 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar