Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 32:3 (2022) ► pp.354–380

Epistemic calibration

Achieving affiliation through access claims and generalizations

ORCID logo | University of HelsinkiHelsinki, Finland
| Tampere UniversityTampere, Finland
Sometimes a division has been made between expressions of knowledge and expressions of emotion, but in the actual instances of interaction, they are deeply intertwined. In this paper we investigate the relationship between these expressions through the notions of affiliation and epistemics. More specifically, we analyze the phenomenon of ‘epistemic calibration’ in response to tellings of personal experience, where recipients fine-tune the strength of their access claims and the degree of their generalizations to be in line with their epistemic statuses in relation to those of the tellers. Drawing on a dataset of Finnish quasi-natural conversations with neurotypical participants and participants diagnosed with Asperger syndrome, we explore how such calibration is done in practice. Our analysis points to different challenges in epistemic calibration, which, we argue, play an important role in influencing the hearing of these responses as less than fully affiliative.
Keywords: conversation analysis, storytelling, affiliation, epistemic access, atypical interaction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Access claims and affiliation
    • 1.2Generalizations and affiliation
    • 1.3Autism spectrum disorder, affiliation, and epistemics
  • 2.Materials and methods
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Epistemic calibration: Fine-tuning the strength of access claim
    • 3.2Epistemic calibration: Fine-tuning the degree of generalization
    • 3.3Epistemic miscalibrations
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 23 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20036.kos
References (64)
References
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Sally Wheelwright, Richard Skinner, Joanne Martin, and Emma Clubley. 2001. “The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 311: 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belmonte, Matthew K. 2008. “Does the Experimental Scientist Have a “Theory of Mind”?” Review of General Psychology 12 (2): 192–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Oxford, UK: Fischer.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2018. “A “Big Package”: Storytelling.” In Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Online chapter retrieved 20.5.2021 from [URL]
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1998. “Figures of Speech: Idiomatic Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language in Society 27 (4): 495–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. “Self-Repair and Action Construction.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics), edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 71–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Alessandra Fasulo. 2006. “‘To Be Honest:’ Sequential Uses of Honesty Phrases in Talk-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (4): 343–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flint, Natalie, Michael Haugh, and Andrew Merrison. 2019. “Modulating Troubles Affiliating in Initial Interactions: The Role of Remedial Accounts.” Pragmatics 29 (3): 384–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 147–190. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli. 2001a [1976]. “Liitepartikkelin -han/-hän syntaksia ja pragmatiikkaa. [Syntax and pragmatics of the clitic –han/hän].” In Lukemisto – kirjoituksia kolmelta vuosikymmeneltä, edited by Lea Laitinen, Pirkko Nuolijärvi, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, and Maria Vilkuna, 44–90. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS).Google Scholar
. 2001b. “On Some Uses of the Discourse Particle ‘kyl(lä)’ in Finnish Conversations.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 171–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. “Being Equivocal: Affective Responses Left Unspecified.” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 147–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happé, Francesca. 1991. “The Autobiographical Writings of Three Asperger Syndrome Adults: Problems of Interpretation and Implication Theory.” In Autism and Asperger Syndrome, edited by Uta Frith, 207–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “An Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Understanding of Story Characters’ Thoughts and Feelings by Able Autistic, Mentally Handicapped and Normal Children and Adults.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 241: 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden. 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2002. “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, edited by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jacob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1993. “The Structure of Death Announcements: Looking on the Bright Side of Death.“ Text 13 (2): 189–212.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth, and Paul Drew. 1995. “Idiomatic Expressions and Their Role in the Organization of Topic Transition in Conversation.” In: Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, 1st ed., edited by Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan van der Linden, André Schenk, and Rob Schreuder, 117–131. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1978. “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, edited by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Is “No” an Acknowledgment Token? Comparing American and British Uses of (+)/(−) Tokens.“ Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1345–1383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by John Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskinen, Emmi, Melisa Stevanovic, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2021. “Affiliation, Topicality, and Asperger’s: The Case of Story-Responsive Questions.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 11 (1): 52–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupetz, Maxi. 2014. “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 4–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2013. “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 250–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning, edited by Charles K. Ogden, and Ivor A. Richard, 296–336. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 1980. “Placement of Topic Changes in Conversation.” Semiotica 30 (3–4): 263–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. “Perspective-Display Sequences in Conversation.” Western Journal of Communication 53 (2): 91–113 (includes Communication Reports). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Social Actions, Gestalt Coherence, and Designations of Disability: Lessons from and about Autism.” Social Problems 52 (4): 499–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. “Why Social Psychology Needs Autism and Why Autism Needs Social Psychology: Forensic and Clinical Considerations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82 (1): 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Jason J. Turowetz. 2017. “Doing Testing: How Concrete Competence Can Facilitate or Inhibit Performances of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Qualitative Sociology 401: 467–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Don H. Zimmerman. 1984. “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly 47 (4): 301–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2004. “Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims about Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (4): 447–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Olga Solomon. 2005. “Practical Logic and Autism.” In A Companion to Psychological Anthropology: Modernity and Psycho-Cultural Change, edited by Robert B. Edgerton, and Conerly Casey, 140–167. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Pentti Henttonen, Liisa Voutilainen, Mikko Kahri, Melisa Stevanovic, Mikko Sams, and Niklas Ravaja. 2015. “Sharing the Emotional Load: Recipient Affiliation Calms Down the Storyteller.” Social Psychology Quarterly 781: 301–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984a. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 2004. “Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analysing Naturally Occurring Talk.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd ed., edited by David Silverman, 200–221. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, volumes I & II1 (edited by G. Jefferson). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2012. “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (4): 387–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Auli Hakulinen. 2009. “Alternative Responses to Assessments.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 280–300. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Emmi Koskinen, Anssi Peräkylä, Taina Nieminen von-Wendt, Elina Sihvola, Pekka Tani, Niklas Ravaja, and Mikko Sams. 2019. ”Physiological Responses to Affiliation During Conversation: Comparing Neurotypical Males and Males with Asperger Syndrome.” PLoS ONE 14 (9): e0222084. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of Course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jacob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jacob Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality, and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jacob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatanen, Anna. 2018. “Responding in Early Overlap: Recognitional Onsets in Assertion Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (2): 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Pentti Henttonen, Mikko Kahri, Maari Kivioja, Niklas Ravaja, Mikko Sams, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2014. “Affective Stance, Ambivalence, and Psychophysiological Responses during Conversational Storytelling.” Journal of Pragmatics 681: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). 1993. ICD-10, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Iversen, Clara
2023. Self-disclosures in online crisis counselling: levelling asymmetries while maintaining client-focus. Nordic Social Work Research ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Weiste, Elina, Melisa Stevanovic & Lise‐Lotte Uusitalo
2022. Experiential expertise in the co‐development of social and health‐care services: Self‐promotion and self‐dismissal as interactional strategies. Sociology of Health & Illness 44:4-5 ► pp. 764 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.