Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 32:1 (2022) ► pp.104–130

Out-grouping and ambient affiliation in Donald Trump’s tweets about Iran

Exploring the role of negative evaluation in enacting solidarity

ORCID logo | University of New South Wales
ORCID logo | University of New South Wales

This paper explores communing affiliation and out-grouping in a corpus of Trump’s tweets about Iran. Communing is a form of ‘ambient affiliation’ (Zappavigna 2011) which offers a way of understanding how Trump attempts to build alignments with his audience without necessarily directly engaging with them, since he tends to ignore replies to his tweets. The paper focuses on three affiliation strategies: convoking (mustering community), promoting (garnering attention), and finessing (dialogistic positioning). It draws on Martin and White’s (2005) Appraisal framework to consider how these affiliation strategies are used to foster communing around ideation-attitude couplings, typically couplings associating Iran with negative judgement or appreciation. Promoting affiliation was found to be the most prominent affiliation strategy used by Trump to garner attention through his rhetorical tendency toward hyperbole.

Keywords: ambient affiliation, coupling, Twitter, Donald Trump, Appraisal, Iran
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Trump’s negativity on Twitter
    • 1.2Background on Iran-US relations
    • 1.3The structure of this article
  • 2.Theoretical framework: Appraisal, and dialogic and communing affiliation
    • 2.1The Appraisal framework
    • 2.2Dialogic affiliation
    • 2.3Communing affiliation
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Construing negative attitude about Iran
  • 5.Communing affiliation strategies employed by Trump
    • 5.1Convoking as a strategy for mustering Trump’s base
    • 5.2Finessing as a strategy for closing down the “outgroups”
    • 5.3Promoting as a strategy for garnering attention and emphasising values
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 23 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20048.mak
References
Anderson, Bryan
2017 “Tweeter-In-Chief: A Content Analysis of President Trump’s Tweeting Habits.” Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 8 (2): 36–47.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 “The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed.” Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981) 84 (8): 80–2.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Erin
8 January 2020 “U.S.-Iran Tensions: From Political Coup to Hostage Crisis to Drone Strikes.” [URL]. Accessed 9 January 2020. [URL]
Ceron, Andrea, and Giovanna d’Adda
2016 “E-campaigning on Twitter: The Effectiveness of Distributive Promises and Negative Campaign in the 2013 Italian Election.” New Media & Society 18 (9): 1935–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Bill
. June 21 2019 “Trump Says He Called Off Strike On Iran Because He Didn’t See It As ‘Proportionate’.” Accessed 20 February 2020. [URL]
Coesemans, Roel, and Barbara De Cock
2017 “Self-reference by Politicians on Twitter: Strategies to Adapt to 140 Characters.” Journal of Pragmatics 1161: 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway-Silva, Bethany A., Christine R. Filer, Kate Kenski, and Eric Tsetsi
2018 “Reassessing Twitter’s Agenda-Building Power: An Analysis of Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects During the 2016 Presidential Primary Season.” Social Science Computer Review 36 (4): 469–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, and Wolfgang C. Müller
2017 “Who Will Attack the Competitors? How Political Parties Resolve Strategic and Collective Action Dilemmas in Negative Campaigning.” Party Politics 23 (6) 666–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn
2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32 (1): 50–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frame, Alex, and Gilles Brachotte
2015 “Le tweet stratégique: Use of Twitter as a PR Tool by French Politicians.” Public Relations Review 41 (2): 278–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, Will J., Brenda Moon, and Janie Busby Grant
2010 “Digital Dialogue? Australian Politicians’ Use of the Social Network Tool Twitter.” Australian Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, J.
2015 “# Feminism is Not a Dirty Word’: Axiology, Ambient Affiliation and Dialogism in Discourses Surrounding Feminism in Microblogging.” Honours Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hoffmann, Christian R.
2018 “Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump.” Internet Pragmatics 1 (1): 55–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hokayem, Emile
2014 “Iran, the Gulf States and the Syrian Civil War.” Survival 56 (6): 59–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, Susan
2010 Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2000 “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in Persuasive Texts.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, edited by Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thomson: 176–207. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Mahrou Zia
2014 “Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses: Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (4): 755–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, Naomi
2010 “Laughing Our Bonds off: Conversational Humor in Relation to Afiliation” PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Knight, Naomi K.
2013 “Evaluating Experience in Funny Ways: How Friends Bond Through Conversational Hum.” Text & Talk 33 (4–5): 553–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona
2017 “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew
2018 “The Return to the Pressure Track: The Trump Administration and the Iran Nuclear Deal.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 29 (1): 94–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul
2016 “Donald Trump’s “Big Liar” Technique.” The New York Times.Google Scholar
Lee, Jasmine C., and Kevin Quealy
2016 “The 282 People, Places and Things Donald Trump has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List.” The New York Times 251.Google Scholar
Litt, Eden, and Eszter Hargittai
2016 “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media+ Society 2 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., and P. R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
2008 “Innocence: Realisation, Instantiation and Individuation in a Botswanan Town.” Questioning linguistics: 27–54.Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah Boyd
2011 “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
2008 “UAM Corpus Tool. Available to download from: [URL].”
Ott, Brian L.
2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pain, Paromita, and Gina Masullo Chen
2019 “The President is in: Public Opinion and the Presidential Use of Twitter.” Social Media+ Society 5 (2): DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Kenneth
2004 The Persian Puzzle: Deciphering the Twenty-five-Year Conflict Between the United States and Iran. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rauchfleisch, Adrian, and Julia Metag
2016 “The Special Case of Switzerland: Swiss Politicians on Twitter.” New Media & Society 18 (10): 2413–2431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell
2020 “ ‘Going Negative’: An APPRAISAL Analysis of the Rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication 701: 13–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media+ Society 4 (2): DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarkhoh, Nadia, and Majid KhosraviNik
2020 “Social Media Discourses of Arabism and the Negotiation of Self in the Middle East.” World Englishes 39 (4): 609–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer
2017 Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. Lodnon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan
2013 “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media – Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems 29 (4): 217–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kay O’Halloran, and Sabine Tan
2019 “Semiotic Space Invasion: The Case of Donald Trump’s US Presidential Campaign.” Semiotica 2019 (226): 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse-Historical Approach.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Tracy, Karen: 1–14. New York: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Ho Young, and Han Woo Park
2014 “Strategies Affecting Twitter-Based Networking Pattern of South Korean Politicians: Social Network Analysis and Exponential Random Graph Model.” Quality & Quantity 48 (1): 409–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 131, no. 51: 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Coffeetweets: Bonding Around the Bean on Twitter. In The Language of Social Media, edited by Seargeant, Philip and Caroline Tagg: 139–160. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
2021 “Ambient Affiliation in Comments on YouTube Videos: Communing Around Values About ASMR.” 外国语 44, no. 1: 21–40.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, and James R. Martin
2018 “# Communing Affiliation: Social Tagging as a Resource for Aligning Around Values in Social Media.” Discourse, Context & Media 221: 4–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar