Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 32:1 (2022) ► pp.80–103

Well-prefaced constructed dialogue as a marker of stance in online abortion discourse

ORCID logo | Coastal Carolina University
This paper offers an analysis of well-prefaced constructed dialogue as a stance-taking resource in written discourse on abortion. Drawing from four corpora collected from editorials, blogs, Twitter, and Reddit, I demonstrate that writers use the discourse marker well to indicate a stance of disalignment and convey negative attitudinal information when there is tension between the writer’s beliefs and those expressed in the constructed dialogue; the discourse marker allows the writer to position and align themself to construct a specific identity that reinforces a positive-self, negative-other evaluation.
Keywords: constructed dialogue, stance, well , discourse markers, abortion discourse, reported speech, reported thought
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse marker well in constructed dialogue
  • 3.Stance framework
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Data and corpus collection
    • 4.2Identifying constructed dialogue
  • 5.Stance-taking with well in constructed dialogue
    • 5.1Constructed dialogue as reported thought: Disalignment with self
    • 5.2Constructed dialogue as reported speech: Disalignment with others
    • 5.3Engaging with the proximal and the distal
      • 5.3.1Proximal stance subjects and objects: In the immediate context
      • 5.3.2Distal stance subjects and objects: Absent others
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 2 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20063.fle
References (59)
References
Aijmer, Karin and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2003. “The Discourse Particle Well and Its Equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics 41 (6): 1123–1161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence From a Corpus. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2018. AntConc (version 3.5.7) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Congrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Adverbial Stance Types in English.” Discourse Processes 11 (1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang. 1990. “I’m Like, ’Say What?!’: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative.” American Speech 65 (3): 215–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Václav, Tony McEnery, and Stephen Wattam. 2015. “Collocations in Context: A New Perspective on Collocation Networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Václav, Matt Timperly, Dana Gablasova, and Tony McEnery. In prep. #LancsBox: A New-Generation Corpus Analysis Tools for Researchers, Students and Teachers.
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, John R. Rickford, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Thomas Wasow, and Arnold Zwicky. 2010. “The Sociolinguistics of a Short-Lived Innovation: Tracing the Development of Quotative All Across Spoken and Internet Newsgroup Data.” Language Variation and Change 221: 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. “Social Stereotypes, Personality Traits, and Regional Perception Displaced: Attitudes Toward the ‘New’ Quotatives in the U.K.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 362–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 1980. “Narrative Go ‘Say’ .” American Speech 551: 304–07. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2012. “Performing Self on the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational Work in Expert Witness Testimony.” Discourse & Society 23 (5): 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. 1999. “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2002. “ She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation Over Time in African American Vernacular English.” American Speech 77 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dailey-O’Caine, Jennifer. 2000. “The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes Toward Focuser Like and Quotative Like .” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (1): 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goi, Simona. 2005. “Agonism, Deliberation, and the Politics of Abortion.” Polity 37 (1): 54–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2015. “ Well-Prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 881: 88–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesson, Ashley and Madeline Shellgren. 2015. “Discourse Marker Like in Real Time: Characterizing the Time Course of Sociolinguistic Impression Formation.” American Speech 90 (2): 154–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language in Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language Linguistics 11: 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie. 2011. Beginning an Action in English and Korean: Turn Design and Action Projection. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, US.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Retroactive Indexing of Relevance: The Use of Well in Third Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2): 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2004. “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14 (2): 27–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “Questionable Answers and Answerable Questions.” In Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, ed. by Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Leeds, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 453–467. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael. 2009. “On ‘Flip-Flopping’: Branded Stance-Taking in U.S. Electoral Politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1996. “Finding ‘Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 591: 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by P. Drew and A. Wootton. 161–227. Chicago: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mathis, Terrie Dawn. 1991. The Form and Function of Constructed Dialogue in Reported Discourse. PhD Dissertation, Louisiana State University, US.
Maynard, Douglas W. 2013. “Defensive Mechanisms: I-Mean Prefaced Utterances in Complaint and Other Conversational Sequences.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi, and Geoffrey Raymond, 198–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niemela, Maarit. 2011. Resonance in Storytelling Verbal, Prosodic and Embodied Practices of Storytelling. PhD dissertation, University of Oulu.
Noy, Chaim and Michael Hamo. 2019. “Stance-Taking and Participation Framework in Museum Commenting Platforms: On Subjects, Objects, Authors, and Principals.” Language in Society 481: 285–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin. 1983. Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Marion. 1981. “Conversational Units and the Use of ‘Well…’.” In Conversation and Discourse, ed. by P. Werth, 99–115. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ivan. 2015. RedditExtractoR: Reddit Data Extraction Toolkit (version 2.0.2). The Comprehensive R Archive Network. [URL]
Sakita, Tomoko I. 2013. “Discourse Markers as Stance Markers: Well in Stance Alignment in Conversational Interaction.” Pragmatics & Cognition 21 (1): 81–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saxton, Karen Leslie. 1992. Discourse Markers in Constructed Dialogue. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University, CA.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 2016. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1985). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen and Mark L. Knapp. 1992. “The Interaction of Visual and Verbal Features in Human Communication.” In Advances in Non-Verbal Communication: Sociocultural, Clinical, Esthetic, and Literary Perspectives, ed. by Fernando Poyatos, 3–14. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1980. “ Well in Conversation.” In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, ed. by S. Greenbaum et al., 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Alex D’Arcy. 2004. “‘He’s Like, She’s Like’: The Quotative System in Canadian Youth.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 81: 493–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko. 2008. “Delaying Dispreferred Responses in English: From a Japanese Perspective.” Language in Society 371: 487–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taspinar, Ahmet. 2016. TwitterScraper. GitHub Repository. [URL]
Trester, Anna Marie. 2009. “Discourse Marker ‘Oh’ as a Means for Realizing the Identity Potential of Constructed Dialogue in Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waksler, Rachelle. 2001. “A New All in Conversation.” American Speech 76 (2): 128–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin. 2010. “Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies 12 (2): 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Stanton E. F. 1996. “Mapping Participant Deictics: A Technique for Discovering Speakers’ Footing.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Acting Out Participant Examples in the Classroom. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Justine, William L. Hamilton, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Dan Jurafsky, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. “Community Identity and User Engagement in a Multicommunity Landscape.” In vol. 11 Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 337–346.Google Scholar