Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 32:1 (2022) ► pp.80–103

Well-prefaced constructed dialogue as a marker of stance in online abortion discourse

ORCID logo | Coastal Carolina University

This paper offers an analysis of well-prefaced constructed dialogue as a stance-taking resource in written discourse on abortion. Drawing from four corpora collected from editorials, blogs, Twitter, and Reddit, I demonstrate that writers use the discourse marker well to indicate a stance of disalignment and convey negative attitudinal information when there is tension between the writer’s beliefs and those expressed in the constructed dialogue; the discourse marker allows the writer to position and align themself to construct a specific identity that reinforces a positive-self, negative-other evaluation.

Keywords: constructed dialogue, stance, well , discourse markers, abortion discourse, reported speech, reported thought
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse marker well in constructed dialogue
  • 3.Stance framework
  • 4.Methods
    • 4.1Data and corpus collection
    • 4.2Identifying constructed dialogue
  • 5.Stance-taking with well in constructed dialogue
    • 5.1Constructed dialogue as reported thought: Disalignment with self
    • 5.2Constructed dialogue as reported speech: Disalignment with others
    • 5.3Engaging with the proximal and the distal
      • 5.3.1Proximal stance subjects and objects: In the immediate context
      • 5.3.2Distal stance subjects and objects: Absent others
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 2 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20063.fle
References
Aijmer, Karin and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2003 “The Discourse Particle Well and Its Equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics 41 (6): 1123–1161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2002 English Discourse Particles: Evidence From a Corpus. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2018 AntConc (version 3.5.7) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Congrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan
1988 “Adverbial Stance Types in English.” Discourse Processes 11 (1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang
1990 “I’m Like, ’Say What?!’: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative.” American Speech 65 (3): 215–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Václav, Tony McEnery, and Stephen Wattam
2015 “Collocations in Context: A New Perspective on Collocation Networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Václav, Matt Timperly, Dana Gablasova, and Tony McEnery
In prep. #LancsBox: A New-Generation Corpus Analysis Tools for Researchers, Students and Teachers.
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, John R. Rickford, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Thomas Wasow, and Arnold Zwicky
2010 “The Sociolinguistics of a Short-Lived Innovation: Tracing the Development of Quotative All Across Spoken and Internet Newsgroup Data.” Language Variation and Change 221: 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006 “Social Stereotypes, Personality Traits, and Regional Perception Displaced: Attitudes Toward the ‘New’ Quotatives in the U.K.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 362–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ronald R.
1980 “Narrative Go ‘Say’ .” American Speech 551: 304–07. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2012 “Performing Self on the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational Work in Expert Witness Testimony.” Discourse & Society 23 (5): 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 765–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber
1999 “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting
2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia
2002 “ She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation Over Time in African American Vernacular English.” American Speech 77 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dailey-O’Caine, Jennifer
2000 “The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes Toward Focuser Like and Quotative Like .” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (1): 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goi, Simona
2005 “Agonism, Deliberation, and the Politics of Abortion.” Polity 37 (1): 54–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2015 “ Well-Prefaced Turns in English Conversation: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 881: 88–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesson, Ashley and Madeline Shellgren
2015 “Discourse Marker Like in Real Time: Characterizing the Time Course of Sociolinguistic Impression Formation.” American Speech 90 (2): 154–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language in Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997 “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language Linguistics 11: 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie
2011 Beginning an Action in English and Korean: Turn Design and Action Projection. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, US.Google Scholar
2013 “Retroactive Indexing of Relevance: The Use of Well in Third Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2): 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2004 “Stance and Subjectivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14 (2): 27–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “Questionable Answers and Answerable Questions.” In Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, ed. by Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Leeds, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 453–467. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael
2009 “On ‘Flip-Flopping’: Branded Stance-Taking in U.S. Electoral Politics.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1996 “Finding ‘Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 591: 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by P. Drew and A. Wootton. 161–227. Chicago: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mathis, Terrie Dawn
1991 The Form and Function of Constructed Dialogue in Reported Discourse. PhD Dissertation, Louisiana State University, US.
Maynard, Douglas W.
2013 “Defensive Mechanisms: I-Mean Prefaced Utterances in Complaint and Other Conversational Sequences.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi, and Geoffrey Raymond, 198–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niemela, Maarit
2011 Resonance in Storytelling Verbal, Prosodic and Embodied Practices of Storytelling. PhD dissertation, University of Oulu.
Noy, Chaim and Michael Hamo
2019 “Stance-Taking and Participation Framework in Museum Commenting Platforms: On Subjects, Objects, Authors, and Principals.” Language in Society 481: 285–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin
1983 Acquiring Conversational Competence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1993 “Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Marion
1981 “Conversational Units and the Use of ‘Well…’.” In Conversation and Discourse, ed. by P. Werth, 99–115. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ivan
2015 RedditExtractoR: Reddit Data Extraction Toolkit (version 2.0.2). The Comprehensive R Archive Network. [URL]
Sakita, Tomoko I.
2013 “Discourse Markers as Stance Markers: Well in Stance Alignment in Conversational Interaction.” Pragmatics & Cognition 21 (1): 81–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saxton, Karen Leslie
1992 Discourse Markers in Constructed Dialogue. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University, CA.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
2016 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1985). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen and Mark L. Knapp
1992 “The Interaction of Visual and Verbal Features in Human Communication.” In Advances in Non-Verbal Communication: Sociocultural, Clinical, Esthetic, and Literary Perspectives, ed. by Fernando Poyatos, 3–14. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
1980 “ Well in Conversation.” In Studies in English Linguistics for Randolph Quirk, ed. by S. Greenbaum et al., 167–177. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Alex D’Arcy
2004 “ ‘He’s Like, She’s Like’: The Quotative System in Canadian Youth.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 81: 493–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko
2008 “Delaying Dispreferred Responses in English: From a Japanese Perspective.” Language in Society 371: 487–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taspinar, Ahmet
2016 TwitterScraper. GitHub Repository. [URL]
Trester, Anna Marie
2009 “Discourse Marker ‘Oh’ as a Means for Realizing the Identity Potential of Constructed Dialogue in Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waksler, Rachelle
2001 “A New All in Conversation.” American Speech 76 (2): 128–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yu-Fang, Pi-Hua Tsai, David Goodman, and Meng-Ying Lin
2010 “Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of Hao and Dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Studies 12 (2): 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Stanton E. F.
1996 “Mapping Participant Deictics: A Technique for Discovering Speakers’ Footing.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Acting Out Participant Examples in the Classroom. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Justine, William L. Hamilton, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Dan Jurafsky, and Jure Leskovec
2017 “Community Identity and User Engagement in a Multicommunity Landscape.” In vol. 11 Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 337–346.Google Scholar