Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 34:3 (2024) ► pp.422–446

Perceiving the organisation through a coding scheme

The construction of managerial expertise in organisational training

ORCID logo | University of Jyväskylä
ORCID logo | University of Jyväskylä
In contemporary organisations, managerial expertise is increasingly viewed as an ability to reflect on activities, processes and human relations within organisational life in order to gain a systemic understanding of the workings of the organisation. This article examines the interactional practices of a consultant-led management training where steering groups of an organisation have a task of gaining such expertise. The article investigates how managerial expertise is constructed and negotiated in training interaction as the groups categorise their managerial actions through a specific coding scheme. The analysis shows that the use of the coding scheme is contingent on being able to display access to organisational processes and activities, connecting general managerial knowledge to specific, local knowledge of the organisation and moving from ‘knowing-that’ to ‘knowing-how’ type of knowledge.
Keywords: knowledge, expertise, professional interaction, management training, organisational consulting, coding scheme
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Knowledge and expertise in professional contexts
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Construction of managerial expertise through the task assignment
    • 4.1Constructing coding as a learning object
    • 4.2Attempting to fill in the grid
    • 4.3Adjusting coding to the organisational reality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21050.nis
References (36)
References
Algahati, Ali. 2014. “Are Ladership and Management Different? A Review.” Journal of Management Policies and Practices 2 (3): 71–82.Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo. 2018. Culture, Discourse, and the Workplace. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2011. “‘So What Problems Bother You and You Are Not Speeding Up Your Work?’ Problem Solving Talk at Work.” Discourse & Communication 5 (3): 209–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, Chiara. 2021. “The Tacit Dimension of Expertise: Professional Vision at Work in Airport Security.” Discourse Studies 23 (5): 597–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. “Invisible Mediators of Action: Classification and the Ubiquity of Standards.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 7 (1–2): 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, Ann L. 2016. “Republication of ‘On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner’.” Journal of Management Education 40 (6): 747–768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, Ann L., and Matthew Eriksen. 2011. “Relational Leadership.” Human Relations 64 (11): 1425–1449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czarniawska, Barbara, and Carmelo Massa. 2013. “Consulting University: A Reflection from Inside.” Financial Accountability & Management 29 (2): 124–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gill, Virginia Teas. 1998. “Doing Attributions in Medical Interaction: Patients’ Explanations for Illness and Doctors’ Responses.” Social Psychology Quarterly 61 (4): 342–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Practices of Color Classification.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 7 (1–2): 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, John, and Jay Woodhams. 2013. “Building Interaction: The Role of Talk in Joining a Community of Practice.” Discourse & Communication 7 (3): 275–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William. 2003. Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, John A., Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2002. “Representing Knowledge: Instances of Management Information.” British Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Action Formation and Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. “Challenges of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa. 2014. “On the Interactional Ecology of Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissi, Riikka. 2015. “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 791: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissi, Riikka, and Heidi Hirsto. 2021. “Policing Language in the World of New Work: The Commodification of Workplace Communication in Organizational Consulting.” Applied Linguistics Review. Published Ahead-of-Print. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissi, Riikka, and Esa Lehtinen. 2016. “Negotiation of Expertise and Multifunctionality: PowerPoint Presentations as Interactional Activity Types in Workplace Meetings.” Language & Communication 481: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 186–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1946. “Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 461: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2010. “Healthcare Iteraction as an Expert Communicative System: An Activity Analysis Perspective.” In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, ed. by Jürgen Streeck, 167–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher N. Candlin. 2011. “Professional and Organisational Practice: A Discourse/Communication Perspective.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 3–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts. 1999. “The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orders in Work-Related Settings.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Celia Roberts, 1–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonen, Mika. 2012. “Mutual Negotiation of the Interviewee’s Competence in Interview Interaction.” In Evaluating ‘Cognitive’ Competences in Interaction, ed. by Gitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer, and Dennis Day, 119–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slack, Roger, Mark Hartswood, Rob Procter, and Mark Rouncefield. 2007. “On Professional Vision and the Lived Work of Mammography.” In Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge, ed. by Stephan Hester, and David Francis, 175–193. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2011. “Leadership Style in Managers’ Feedback in Meetings.” In Constructing Identities at Work, ed. by Jo Angouri, and Meredith Marra, 17–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Von Platen, Sara. 2018. “Communication Consulting and Consultancies.” In The International Encyclopedia of Strategic Communication, ed. by Robert L. Heath, and Winni Johansen. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robin. 2007. “The ‘Problem of Dust’: Forensic Investigation as Practical Action.” In Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge, ed. by Stephan Hester, and David Francis, 195–210. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Karvonen, Ulla & Riikka Nissi
2024. Enabling participation in joint drumming within organizational workshops. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Virtanen, Mikko T & Riikka Nissi
2024. Negotiating joint commitment in collaborative work project: Focus on text-based requests and news deliveries in atypical work. Discourse Studies 26:3 ► pp. 402 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.