Cover not available
Article published In:
Concepts and Context in Relevance-Theoretic Pragmatics: New Developments
Edited by Agnieszka Piskorska and Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics 33:3] 2023
► pp. 436–459

Metarepresentational phenomena in Japanese and English

Implications for comparative linguistics

| Nara University
Contrastive studies of languages usually focus on differences in lexical items, syntactic structures, semantic expressions, collocations, and so on. In the present paper we take a cognitive pragmatic approach, assuming that metarepresentation in the sense of Sperber (2000) and Wilson (2000) offers a crucial perspective in such studies. We discuss how the speech act component of higher-level explicatures is linguistically realized in Japanese and English, focusing on sentence adverbials, ‘because’ clauses, speech act particles, reported speech, private predicates, and desiderative predicates. We conclude that in the Japanese language, information concerning the speech act component tends to be linguistically realized, while such information is not necessarily realized in English. We suggest that this cognitive pragmatic approach can be applied to other languages where higher-level explicatures are basically explicit as in Japanese or implicit as in English.
Keywords: relevance theory, comparative linguistics, metarepresentation, higher-level explicaures, linguistic realization, speech act component
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Realizations of metarepresentations
    • 2.1Metarepresentational adverbials
    • 2.2‘…, because …’ construction
    • 2.3Linguistic realizations of speech acts
  • 3.Realizations of first- and second-order metarepresentations
    • 3.1Reported speech
    • 3.2Metarepresentational information in inflection in Japanese
      • 3.2.1Private predicates
      • 3.2.2Desiderative predicates
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 16 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21061.uch
References (31)
References
Aoki, Haruo. 1986. “Evidentials in Japanese.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 223–238. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1994. “Echo Questions: A Pragmatic Account.” Lingua 941: 197–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Are Apposition Markers Discourse Markers?” Journal of Linguistics 321: 325–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwata, Seizi. 2003. “Echo Questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 261: 185–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1973. “Where Epistemology, Style, and Grammar Meet: A Case Study from Japanese.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Stephen R. Anderson, and Paul Kiparsky, 377–391. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishiguchi, Sumiyo. 2006. “Fake Past and a Monster.” Stony Brook Occasional Papers in Lingusitics I1: 152–171.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko, and Wenjiang Yang. 2018. “Evidentiality in Japanese.” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandre Y. Aikhenvald, 709–724. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noh, Eun-Ju. 1995. “A Pragmatic Approach to Echo Questions.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 107–140.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6): 603–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Metarepresentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “On Linguistic Communication Based on Resemblance in Form.” Journal of Pragmatics 1861: 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1970. “On Declarative Sentences.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by Roderick A. Jacobs, and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 222–272. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Rutherford, William E. 1970. “Some Observations Concerning Subordinate Clauses in English.” Language 46 (1): 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. “Understanding Verbal Understanding.” In What is Intelligence? ed. by Jean Khalfa, 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2000. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Dierdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mindreading.” Mind and Language 171: 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchida, Seiji. 1998. “‘(No)da’ – Kanrensei Riron karano Shiten [‘Noda’ in Relevance Theory].” In Gendai Eigo no Goho to Bunpo [English Usage and Grammar], ed. by the Editorial Board, 243–251. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
. 2011. Goyoron no Shatei [The Scope of Pragmatics]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
. 2013. Kotoba-wo Yomu, Kokoro-wo Yomu: Ninchi Goyoron Nyumon [Reading Words, Reading Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
. 2022. “Metarepresentation kara mita evidentiality [Metarepresentation and Evidentiality].” Memoirs of Nara University 501: 129–145.Google Scholar
Uchida, Seiji, and Eun-Ju Noh. 2018. “Metarepresentational Phenomena in Japanese and Korean.” Memoirs of Nara University 461: 1–23.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2000. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Dierdre, and Dan Sperber. 1993. “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 931: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar