Medial deictic demonstratives in Arabic
Fact or fallacy
This paper investigates two different views concerning the number of deictic degrees of demonstratives in Classical Arabic (CA) and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). The first view claims that CA has a medial category of demonstratives in addition to proximals and distals; the second view postulates that there are only proximals and distals in CA. The study examines the dialectal origin of singular and dual CA demonstratives based on writings of ancient grammarians in addition to investigating the Semitic origin of these demonstratives. It is argued that the demonstrative system in CA is the result of a combination of two dialectal demonstrative systems: one of these had been used in Old ?ijaazi, while the other had been used in Old Tamiimi Arabic. Each of these dialects had only proximals and distals but no medials. Demonstratives in these dialects had dissimilar forms for distals. ?ijaazi distals had two suffixes attached to the proximal base, while Tamiimi ones had one suffix only. The presence of these different forms led grammarians representing the first view to the fallacy that demonstratives with one suffix are medials, while those with two suffixes are distals. However, the supposed medials are in fact the distals that were used in Old Tamiimi; their distance value is the same as that of Old Hijaazi distals.
References
Akbari, Abdullah
(d. 1219) (
2001)
Allubaab fi ‘ilal albinaa’ wal ‘i ‘raab, vol 1.
Gh. M. Telimaat (ed.). Beirut: Dar Alfikr Almu’aasir.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Al-Hamad, Ghanim
(
2004)
Abhaath fi Al’arabiia Alfusha. Amman: Dar ‘ammar.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen, and E. Keenan
(
1985)
Deixis. In
T. Shopen (ed.),
Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–308.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ashmuuni, Muhammad
(d. 1522) (
1993)
Manhaj Asaalik ila Alfiiat Ibn Malik, vol1.
A.A. ‘abd Al-Hamiid (ed.). Cairo: Almaktaba Al’zhariia Lituraath.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Azhari, Muhammad
(d. 980) (
2001)
Tahðiib Al-Lugha, vol 15. M.
Mir’ib (ed.). Beirut: Dar ‘iHyaa’ Aturaath Al’arabi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beeston, Alfred
(
1970)
The Arabic Language Today. London: Hutchinson.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brockelmann, Carl
(
1977a)
Tariikh Al’dəb Al’arabi (Geschichte der Arabischen Literatur 1898–1902) vol 1.
A. Najjar (trans.), 4th ed. Cairo: Dar Al-ma’araif.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brockelmann, Carl
(
1977b)
Fiqh Alloghat Asamyaa (Grundriss der Vergleichenden Grammatik der Semitischen Sprachen 1908–1913).
R. Abd Etawwab (trans.). Riyadh: Riyadh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farraa’, Yahya
(d. 822) (
2001)
Ma ‘aani AlQuran vol 1. In
A.Y. Najati, and
M.A. Najjar (eds.), 3rd ed. Cairo: Dar Alkutub Al-Masria.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleisch, Henri
(
1979)
Traité de Philologie Arabe, vol. 2. Beyrouth: Dar al-Machreq.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Wolfdietrich
(
1987)
Grammatik des Klassischen Arabisch. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghalaaiini, Mustafa, A. Khafaja
A. A’hl 1973 Jami’ ‘adduruus ‘al’arabyya. Beirut: Almatba’a Al-’asryya.
Hasselbach, Rebecca
(
2007)
Demonstratives in Semitic.
Journal of the American Oriental Society 107.1: 1–27.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holes, Clive
(
2004)
Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, and Varieties. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Yan
(
2007)
Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ibn ‘Aqiil, Abdullaah
(d.1367) (
1996)
Sharh Ibn ‘qiil ‘ala Alfiiat Ibn Malik, vol 1.
MM. Halawi (ed.). Beirut: Dar Ahiia? Aturath Al- ‘arabi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ibn Manduur, Muhammad
(d. 1311) (
1999)
Lisaan Al-’arab vol 5.
A. Abdilwahaab, and
M. Al-’ubaidy (eds.). Beirut: Dar ?ihyaa? Aturaath Al-’rabi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ingham, Bruce
(
1982)
Northeast Arabian Dialects. London: Kegan Paul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jawhari, Ism’iil
(d.1002) (
1990)
Aṣiḥaaḥ vol 6.
A. Aṭṭaar (ed.). Beirut: Dar Al-’ilm Lilmalaiin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnstone, Thomas
(
1967)
Eastern Arabian Dialect Studies. London: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen
(
2006)
Deixis and Pragmatics. In
H. Larry, and
W. Gregory (eds.),
The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 97–121.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lipinski, Edward
(
2001)
Semitic Languages: Outline of a Comparative Grammar. 2nd ed. Orientalia Lovanensia Analecta. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John
(
1977)
Semantics. Rpt. 1978. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mubarrad, Muḥammad
(d.898) (
1963)
Al-muqtaḍab vol. 3.
M. ‘adiima (ed). Beirut: ‘alam Al-kutub.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Owens, Jonathan
(
2006)
A Linguistic History of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prochazka, Theodore
(
1988)
Saudi Arabian Dialects. New York: Kegan Paul.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Qabbish, Aḥmad
(
1979)
Alkamil fi naḥau wa Saraf wal ‘i’raab. Beirut: Dar Al-Jiil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sieny, Maḥmuud
(
1978)
The Syntax of Urban Higazi Arabic (Saudi Arabia). London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sibawayhi, Uthmaan
(d.793) (
1991)
Al-Kitaab.
A.M. Haruun (ed.). Beirut: Dar Aljiil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soyuutii, Jalauddiin
(d.1505) (
1975)
Sharah Jam’ Aljawaami’ ham’ Alhwaami’.
A.M. Haruun, and
A.S. Makram (eds.). Kuwait: Dar Al-bunuuth Al’ilmia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rabin, Chaim
(
1951)
Ancient West-Arabian. London: Taylor’s Foreign Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Versteegh, Kees
(
2001)
The Arabic Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, William
(
1898)
A Grammar of the Arabic Language. Rpt 1976. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamakhshari, Maḥmuud
(d. 1143) (
1999)
Al-Mufaṣil fi ṣan’at al-’i’raab.
A.B. Ya’quub (ed.). Beirut: Dar Al-kutub Al-’ilmia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziad, Mis’ad
(nd)
[URL]. Retrieved
May 12 2009.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018.
Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic.
Topics in Linguistics 19:2
► pp. 57 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012.
Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study.
Research in Language 10:4
► pp. 423 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.