Cover not available
Article published In:
The interplay between professional identities and age, gender and ethnicity
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Jonathan Clifton
[Pragmatics 22:2] 2012
► pp. 231–254

“The guys would like to have a lady:” The co-construction of gender and professional identity in interviews between employers and female engineering students

Gender and professional identity are intertwined particularly in professions where women are underrepresented, making gender identities and professional identities simultaneously relevant. A promising area for inquiry into identity construction (and one where the effect of actions to increase the proportion of women in professions such as engineering can potentially be observed) is graduate recruitment, a process designed to put novice professional identities to the test. This paper takes a social constructionist approach in exploring the discursive negotiation of female engineers’ professional identities and how these are co-constructed dynamically in interaction with gender identities in this important gatekeeping context. The analysis, which draws on examples from a dataset of 20 naturally occurring interviews between employers and final-year undergraduates at a university in New Zealand, focuses particularly on the interplay of gender in the necessary synthesis of personal and institutional discourses in constructing a professional identity. Ways in which gender is oriented to explicitly and/or implicitly in these gatekeeping encounters are shown to resonate with existing gender divisions (technical vs relational) in the androcentric professional context of engineering, undermining a pro-women recruitment stance. Central to the validation of professional identities by interviewers was the demonstration of “passion for engineering” but ways in which it was deemed to be demonstrated, such as through reasons for career choice and outside interests, were arguably gender-circumscribed. This further set of normative expectations, on top of the existing competency-discourse-driven requirement to fit candidates into prescribed categories, contributes invisibly to maintaining the homogeneous identity of the engineering profession. The tension between conflicting requirements for “difference” and “sameness” in the professional identities of female engineers is highlighted in a discussion of the ways gender is made relevant in the co-construction of these identities.

Keywords: Co-construction, Female engineers, Graduate recruitment, Gender stereotypes, Careers and employment discourse, Professional identity
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.2.03rei
References
Bergvall, V.L.
(1996) Constructing and enacting gender through discourse: Negotiating multiple roles as female engineering students. In V.L. Bergvall, J.M. Bing, and A.F. Freed (eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice. London: Longman, pp. 173–201.Google Scholar
Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Crane, D. Middleton, and A. Radley
(1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., and K. Hall
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7.4-5: 585–614. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., and C. Roberts
(2007) Migration, ethnicity and competing discourses in the job interview: Synthesizing the institutional and personal. Discourse & Society 18.5: 243–271. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Champy, J.
(1995) Re-engineering management: The mandate for new leadership. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
De Fina, A.
(2003) Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dick, P., and S. Nadin
(2006) Reproducing gender inequalities? A critique of realist assumptions underpinning personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 79.3: 481–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryburgh, H.
(1999) Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering: Adapting to the culture. Gender and Society 13.5: 664–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P., and S. McConnell-Ginet
(1992a) Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, April 4–5 1992, 89–99.
(1992b) Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 211: 461–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evetts, J.
(1996) Gender and career in science and engineering. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(2000) Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4.2: 163–195. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, W.
(2007) ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science 37.3: 331–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J.K.
(1999) Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, J., C. Lankshear, and G.A. Hull
(1996) The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1992) Interviewing in intercultural situations. In P. Drew, and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 302–327.Google Scholar
Halford, S., and P. Leonard
(2006) Negotiating gendered identities at work. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, L.
(1992) Migrant engineers’ job interview performance: A cross cultural analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 15.2: 90–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, A.W.
(1995) Co-constructing institutional identities: The case of student counselees. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28.3: 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.
(2006) Gendered talk at work. Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Malden MA: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Iedema, R.
(2003) Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
IPENZ
(2010) Minority groups in education. Report prepared for the National Engineering Education Plan Project. Wellington: IPENZ. Available at [URL]
(2011) The retention and renewal of women in engineering: An IPENZ Plan to encourage diversity in and sustainability of the engineering profession. Wellington: IPENZ. Available at [URL]
Jacoby, S., and E. Ochs
(1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28.3: 171–183. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jagacinski, C.M.
(1987) Engineering careers: Women in a male-dominated field. Psychology of Women Quarterly 11.1: 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jagacinski, C.M., and W.K. LeBold
(1981) A comparison of men and women undergraduate and professional engineers. Engineering Education 72.3: 213–220.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.
(ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R.
(2004) Social identity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.
(2004)  Screwing diversity out of the workers? Reading diversity. Journal of Organizational Change 17.3: 281–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerekes, J.A.
(2006) Winning an interviewer’s trust in a gatekeeping encounter. Language in Society 35.1: 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2004) Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Küskü, F., M. Özbilgin, and L. Özkale
(2007) Against the tide: Gendered prejudice and disadvantage in engineering. Gender, Work & Organization 14.2: 109–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLachlan, M., S. Forsyth, and L. Cassells
(1992) Job winning in New Zealand. Auckland, N.Z.: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
(2003) Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36.1: 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, B.
(1995) Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In K. Hall, and M. Bucholtz (eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self. New York: Routledge, pp. 217–243.Google Scholar
Nentwich, J.C.
(2006) Changing gender: The discursive construction of equal opportunities. Gender, Work & Organization 13.6: 499–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, B., R.M. Felder, R. Brent, and I. Elhajj
(2004) Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning 2.1: 9–34.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26.3: 287–306. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ozbilgin, M.F., and D. Woodward
(2004) Belonging and otherness: Sex equality in banking in Turkey and Britain. Gender, Work and Organization 11.6: 668–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A.L.
(2008, July) Work in progress: Engineering identity markers in faculty members. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium . Davos, Switzerland.
Powell, A., B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty
(2009) Women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work & Organization 16.4: 411–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reissner-Roubicek, S.
(2010) Communicative strategies in the behavioural job interview: The influence of discourse norms on graduate recruitment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Auckland.
Roberts, C., and S. Campbell
(2005) Fitting stories into boxes: Rhetorical and textual constraints on candidates’ performances in British job interviews. Journal of Applied Linguistics 2.1: 45–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Talk on trial: Job interviews, language and ethnicity. DWP Research Report No. Available at [URL]
Roberts, C., and S. Sarangi
(1999) Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In S. Sarangi, and C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 473–503. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.G., and J.S. McIllwee
(1991) Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly 32.3: 403–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharp, R., S. Franzway, J. Mills, and J. Gill
(2011) Flawed policy, failed politics? Challenging the sexual politics of managing diversity in engineering organizations. Gender, Work & Organization. Article first published online: 20 January, 2011.
Shepherd, D.M., and J.K. Pringle
(2004) Resistance to organizational culture change: A gendered analysis. In R. Thomas, A. J. Mills, and J. Helms Mills (eds.), Identity politics at work: Resisting gender, gendering resistance. Oxford/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stonyer, H.
(2002) Making engineering students - making women: The discursive context of engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, Special Issue on Women in Engineering 18.4: 392–399.Google Scholar
Stubbe, M., C. Lane, J. Hilder, E. Vine, B. Vine, and M. Marra
(2003) Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies 5.3: 351–388. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Takruri-Rizk, H., K. Jensen, and K. Booth
(2006) Experiences of engineering students: Is Gender an issue? Paper presented at the Education in a Changing Environment Conference , University of Salford. Available at [URL]
Tonso, K.
(2007) On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The University of Auckland
(2011, July 12) Engineering rewarding for women. Retrieved from [URL]
Young, A., and D. Hurlic
(2007) Gender enactment at work: The importance of gender and gender-related behavior to person-organizational fit and career decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology 22: 2: 168–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Mieroop, D.
(2007) The complementarity of two identities and two approaches: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of institutional and professional identity. Journal of Pragmatics 39.6: 1120–1142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, I., and R. Wodak
(2006) Performing success: Identifying strategies of self-presentation in women’s biographical narratives. Discourse & Society 17.3: 385–411. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Formato, Federica
2021. Production and reception of Fathers' construction of their daughter’s sexuality on Twitter. Critical Discourse Studies 18:6 ► pp. 637 ff. DOI logo
Gorman, Elizabeth H.
2015. Getting ahead in professional organizations: individual qualities, socioeconomic background and organizational context. Journal of Professions and Organization 2:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Reissner-Roubicek, Sophie
2017. Chapter 4. Juggling “I”s and “we”s with “he”s and “she”s. In Identity Struggles [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 69], ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, Jonathan Clifton & Charlotte Schreurs
2019. The Interactional Negotiation of the Rules of the Employment Interview Game: Negative Remarks About Third Parties and “Doing” Trust. International Journal of Business Communication 56:4 ► pp. 560 ff. DOI logo
Van De Mieroop, Dorien & Stephanie Schnurr
2018. Candidates’ humour and the construction of co-membership in job interviews. Language & Communication 61 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Kyoung-Hee, Sunghoon Kim & Simon Restubog
2015. Transnational Contexts for Professional Identity Development in Accounting. Organization Studies 36:11 ► pp. 1577 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.