Deceptive clickbaits in the relevance-theoretic lens
What makes them similar to punchlines
This paper explores the nature of clickbaiting as a form of viral journalism from a relevance-theoretic perspective (
Sperber and Wilson 1995;
Wilson and Sperber 2012). The focus is on deceptive clickbaits, i.e., manipulative internet headlines whose interpretation, based on the way they are worded, leads to opening an information gap, thus luring the reader into clicking on the link provided with a view to increasing the website traffic. It is highlighted that such headlines exploit linguistic underdeterminacy, and unlike felicitous headlines, which provide an accurate representation of the article content and therefore play the role of
relevance optimizers (
Dor 2003), deceptive clickbaits induce recipients to generate interpretations which arouse their intense curiosity but are ultimately incompatible with the article’s content. The paper shows how relevance theory can explain the interpretation bias that the reader of deceptive clickbaits falls prey to and advances the idea that there is affinity in this respect between deceptive clickbaits and jokes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Major functions of headlines
- 3.Clickbait headlines: Characteristic features
- 4.Deceptive clickbaits: A relevance-theoretic analysis
- 5.Deceptive clickbaits and jokes
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (46)
References
Bach, Kent. 2007. “Regression in Pragmatics (and Semantics).” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 29–30. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Bazaco, Ángela, Marta Redondo, and Pilar Sánchez-García. 2019. “Clickbait as a Strategy of Viral Journalism: Conceptualisation and Methods.” Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 741: 94–115. [URL]. 
Belleri, Delia. 2014. Semantic Under-Determinacy and Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Blom, Jonas, and Kenneth Hansen. 2015. “Click Bait: Forward– Reference as Lure in Online News Headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 87–100. 

Bransford, John, and Marcia Johnson. 1972. “Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: Some Investigations of Comprehension and Recall.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 111: 717–726. 

Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 

Carston, Robyn. 2010. “Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor: From a Relevance Theory Perspective.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 153–180.
Chen, Yimin, Nadia Conroy, and Victoria Rubin. 2015. “Misleading Online Content: Recognizing Clickbait as False News.” In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection, 15–19. 

Day, H. I. 1982. “Curiosity and the Interested Explorer.” Performance and Instruction 21 (4): 19–22. 

Dor, Daniel. 2003. “On Newspaper Headlines as Relevance Optimizers.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 695–721. 

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Dynel, Marta. 2018. Irony, Deception and Humour. Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter. 

Ecker, Ullrich, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ee Pin Chang, Rekha Pillai. 2014. “The Effects of Subtle Misinformation in News Headlines.” Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 20 (4): 323–335. 

Galasiński, Dariusz. 2000. The Language of Deception. A Discourse Analytical Study. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 

Geer, John, and Kim Kahn. 1993. “Grabbing Attention: An Experimental Investigation of Headlines During Campaigns.” Political Communication 101: 175–91. 

Graney, John. 1990. “Determination of Fact and Opinion: A Critical Reading Problem.” Journal of Psycholinguist Research 191: 147–166. 

Iarovici, Edith, and Rodica Amel, R. 1989. “The Strategy of the Headline.” Semiotica 77 (4): 441–459. 

Ifantidou, Elly. 2009. “Newspaper Headlines and Relevance: Ad Hoc Concepts in Ad Hoc Contexts.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 699–720. 

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna. 2012. “Semantics/Pragmatics Boundary Disputes.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, ed. by Claudia Maienbom, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 2333–2360. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jodłowiec, Maria. 2015. The Challenges of Explicit and Implicit Communication. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 

Krug, Damon, Byron George, Shawn Hannon, and John Glover. 1989. “The Effect of Outlines and Headings on Readers’ Recall of Text.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 141: 111–123. 

Kuiken, Jeffrey, Anne Schuth, Martijn Spitters, and Maarten Marx. 2017. “Effective Headlines of Newspaper Articles in a Digital Environment.” Digital Journalism 5 (10): 1300–1314. 

Lew, Robert. 1996. “Exploration of Linguistic Ambiguity in Polish and English Jokes.” Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 311: 127–133.
Livingstone, Sonia, and Peter Lunt. 1994. Talk on Television. Audience Participation and Public Debate. London and New York: Routledge.
Loewenstein, George. 1994. “The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation.” Psychological Bulletin 116 (1): 75–98. 

Miller, Lisa., Jason Cohen, and Arthur Wingfield. 2006. “Contextual Knowledge Reduces Demands on Working Memory during Reading.” Memory & Cognition 341: 1355–1367. 

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2015. “On the Role of Vigilance in the Interpretation of Puns.” Humor – International Journal of Humor Research 28 (3): 469–490.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2016. “Vigilance Mechanisms in Interpretation: Hermeneutical Vigilance.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133 (1): 21–29.
Piskorska, Agnieszka, and Maria Jodłowiec. 2018. “Weak Communication, Joke Targets and the Punch-Line Effect: A Relevance-Theoretic Account.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 13 (1): 25–44.
Potthast, Martin, Sebastian Köpsel, Benno Stein, and Matthias Hagen. 2016. “Clickbait Detection.” In Advances in Information Retrieval, ed. by Nicola Ferro, Fabio Crestani, Marie-Francine Moens, Josiane Mothe, Fabrizio Silvestri, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Claudia Hauff, and Gianmaria Silvello, 810–817. Switzerland: Springer. 

Scott, Kate. 2021. “You Won’t Believe What’s in This Paper! Clickbait, Relevance and the Curiosity Gap.” Journal of Pragmatics 1751: 53–66. 

Shin, Dajung, and Sung-il Kim. 2019. “Homo Curious: Curious or Interested?” Educational Psychology Review 311: 853–874. 

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 2002. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind–Reading.” Mind & Language 171: 3–23. 

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 2005. “Pragmatics.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 171: 353–388.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 2008. “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond Gibbs, 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Straumann, Heinrich. 1935. Newspaper Headlines. A Study in Linguistic Method. London: Unwin Brothers.
Sweeny, Kate., Darya Melnyk, Wendi Miller, and James Shepperd. 2010. “Information Avoidance: Who, What, When, and Why.” Review of General Psychology 14 (4): 340–353. 

Van Dijk, Teun. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wiley, Jennifer, and Keith Rayner. 2000. “Effects of Titles on the Processing of Text and Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Movements.” Memory & Cognition 281: 1011–1021. 

Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Finkbeiner, Rita
2024.
The pragmatics of headlines. Central issues and future research avenues.
Journal of Pragmatics 222
► pp. 17 ff.

Zhang, Mei, Haotian Wu, Yang Huang, Ruibing Han, Xinyuan Fu, Zhizhi Yuan & Shuer Liang
2024.
Negative news headlines are more attractive: negativity bias in online news reading and sharing.
Current Psychology 43:38
► pp. 30156 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.