References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I think – An English Modal Particle”. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westwik, 2–44. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Jan Lindström
2011 “Verb-first Conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speaking”. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. by Peter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 218–262. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Left/right Asymmetries and the Grammar of Pre- vs. Post-positioning in German and Swedish Talk-in-Interaction”. Language Sciences 561: 68–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Nicole, and Juliane House
2010 “ I think and I don’t know in English as Lingua Franca and Native English Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5): 1184–1200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blensenius, Kristian
2014Jag tänker att… [“I think that…”]. Språktidningen 1/2015 [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Silke Reineke
2017 “Epistemische Praktiken und ihre feinen Unterschiede: Verwendungen von ich dachte in gesprochener Sprache.” In Verben im interaktiven Kontext. Bewegungsverben und mental Verben in gesprochenen Deutsch, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske, and Arne Zeschel, 337–375. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Diaz, Maria Angela, Ken Lau, and Chia-Yen Lin
Drew, Paul
2013 “Turn Design.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 131–149. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick
2011 “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Jakob Steensig, Lorenza Mondada, and Tanya Stivers, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, Sophia
2023 “The Grammar-in-Use of Direct Reported Thought in French and German. An Interactional and Multimodal Analysis.” PhD dissertation, University of Neuchâtel/University of Hamburg.
Frommhertz, Yannick
2022 “Thinking Things in German versus Swedish. A Cross-linguistic Comparison of Verbs of Thinking in Two Genetically Close Languages.” Studia Linguistica 761: 464–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Susanna Karlsson
2003 “Re-thinking THINK: Contrastive Semantics of Swedish and English.” In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Australian Language Society, ed. by Cristo Moskovsky. [URL]
Hall, Joan Kelly, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2001 “L2 Interactional Competence and Development.” In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, ed. by Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellerman, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, 1–15. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2014 “Agreement or Crystallization: Patterns of 1st and 2nd Person Subjects and Verbs of Cognition in Finnish Conversational Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 631: 63–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellermann, John
2008Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper, and Tom Koole
2020 “Sharing Knowledge with Peers: Epistemic Displays in Collaborative Writing of Primary School Children.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 241: 100378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Sandra A. Thompson
2008 “Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by Ritva Laury, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “I Thought It Was Very Interesting: Conversational Formats for Taking a Stance.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (15): 2194–2210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Susanna
2005Modalitet i interaktion. En studie av jag tycker och tycker jag [Modality in interaction. A study of jag tycker and tycker jag ]. In Samtal och grammatik. Studier i svenskt samtalsspråk, ed. by Jan Anward, and Bengt Nordberg, 119–138. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Johannes Wagner
2011 “A Conversation-Analytic Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” In Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Dwight Atkinson, 117–142. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Clauses Emerging as Epistemic Adverbs in Estonian Conversation.” Linguistica Uralica 46 (2): 81–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolu, Jaana
2022 “Vad tänker du om det? Verbet tänka som epistemisk markör i tidningsspråk [What do you think about it? The verb tänka as an epistemic marker in newspapers].” In Svenskan i Finland 191, ed. by Siv Björklund, Bodil Haagensen, Marianne Nordman, and Anders Westerlund, 149–162. Vasa: Svensk-Österbottniska Samfundet.Google Scholar
Lahtinen, Sinikka
2010 “Min kompis plejar drums. Engelskans inflytande på finska högstadieelevers svenska [My friend plays the drums. English influence on Finnish upper elementary school pupils’ Swedish].” In Svenskans beskrivning 30, ed. by Cecilia Falk, Andreas Nord, and Rune Palm, 177–186. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Tsuyoshi Ono
(eds) 2020Fixed Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014 “Introduction.” Pragmatics 24:3: 435–452.Google Scholar
Lehti-Eklund, Hanna
2006 “Att planera och reparera. Skillnader mellan talare av svenska som förstaspråk och andraspråk [To plan and repair. Differences between speakers of Swedish as first and second language].” In Lek och lärt. Vänskrift till Jan Einarsson, ed. by Sofia Ask, Gunilla Byrman, Solveig Hammarbäck, Maria Lindgren, and Per Stille, 120–131. Växjö: Växjö University Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan, and Anne-Marie Londen
2008 “Constructing Reasoning. The Connectives för att (Causal), så att (Consecutive) and men att (Adversative) in Swedish Conversations.” In Constructional Reorganization, ed. by Jaakko Leino. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2016 “A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1061: 72–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullan, Kerry, and Susanna Karlsson
2012 “Subjectivity in Contrast: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison of ‘I think’ in Australian English, French and Swedish.” In Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse, ed. by Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois, and Juliane House, 271–294. Brill.Google Scholar
Nelson, Marie, and Sofie Henricson
2019 “Kognitionsverb i sverigesvenska och finlandssvenska handledningssamtal [Cognition verbs in Sweden-Swedish and Finland-Swedish supervision meetings].” Puhe ja kieli 39:1: 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrby, Catrin, Jan Lindström, Jenny Nilsson, and Camilla Wide
2020 “Pluricentric Languages.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 231, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 201–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2007 “Increments in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Introductory Remarks.” Pragmatics 17:4: 505–512.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, and Evelyne Pochon-Berger
2011 “Developing ‘Methods’ for Interaction: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disagreement Sequences in French L2.” In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, ed. by Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellerman, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. by Teresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 233–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rönnqvist, Sara, and Jan Lindström
2021 “Turn Continuations and Gesture: “And Then”-Prefacing in Multi-Party Conversations.” Frontiers in Communication 61: 670173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rönnqvist, Sara
2021 “Det adverbiella uttrycket på något sätt i samtalsinteraktion [The adverbial expression på något sätt (’in some way’) in Swedish interaction].” Språk och stil 31:2, 39–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saarela, Jan
2021Finlandssvenskarna 2021 – en statistisk rapport [Finland Swedes 2021 – A statistical report]. Helsingfors: Svenska Finlands Folkting.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2001Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers
2013The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skjold Frøshaug, Andrea, and Truls Stende
2021Does the Nordic Language Community Exist? Analysis no. 01/2021. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skogmyr Marian, Klara
2020The Development of Interactional Competence in a Second Language. A Multimodal Analysis of Complaining in French Interactions. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2013 “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-Making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics 23 (3): 519–544.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2005 “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction”. Semiotica 156–1/41: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
2021 “The Emancipation of Gestures.” Interactional Linguistics 1 (1): 90–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002 “Object Complements and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language 26 (1): 125–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Volume II. Types of Grammatical Markers. ed. by Bernd Heine, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toropainen, Outi, and Sinikka Lahtinen
2013 “Argumentation på L2-svenska: inlärare skriver insändare [Argumentation in L2-Swedish: learners write readers’ letters].” In Svenskans beskrivning 33, ed. by Jan Lindström, Sofie Henricson, Anne Huhtala, Pirjo Kukkonen, Hanna Lehti-Eklund, and Camilla Lindholm. Helsingfors: Helsingfors Universitet.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
1958 [2003]The Uses of Argument. Updated Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
2005 “The Lexical Typological Profile of Swedish Mental Verbs.” Languages in Contrast 5 (1): 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Johannes
2015 “Designing for Language Learning in the Wild: Creating Social Infrastructures for Second Language Learning.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, ed. by Teresa Cadierno, and Søren Wind Eskildsen, 75–104. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar