Article published In:
The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 203227
References (17)
Connolly, John H. (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In Gerry Wanders, and Evelien Keizer (eds), Web Papers in Functional Grammar WP-FDG-82, Special Issue: the London Papers I: 97-115. Available at: [URL].Google Scholar
Cruz, Aline da (2011) Fonologia e Gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. (1990) The origin of “mother-in-law vocabulary” in two Australian languages. Anthropological Linguistics 331: 1-56.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah NY: Erlbaum.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12.3: 175-204.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees (2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34.4: 468-479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin (1997) Turkish (Routledge Descriptive Grammars). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan (this volume) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 249-273. DOI logo
Öztürk, Balkız (2002) Turkish as a non-pro-drop language. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 239-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan (2008) Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Daniel García Velasco, and Jan Rijkhoff (eds), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-115.Google Scholar
Santos, Ana Lúcia (2009) Minimal answers: Ellipsis, syntax and discourse in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staden, Miriam van (2000) Tidore: A linguistic description of a language of the North Moluccas. Ph.D. dissertation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022. Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 82  pp. 101273 ff. DOI logo
KEIZER, EVELIEN
2020. The problem of non-truth-conditional, lower-level modifiers: a Functional Discourse Grammar solution. English Language and Linguistics 24:2  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte & Scott A. Schwenter
2019. Echoic and non-echoic confirming affirmative responses in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics 141  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Cenerini, Chantale
2018. External possessor constructions and Cree relational inflection compared. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205],  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien & Hella Olbertz
2018. Functional Discourse Grammar. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205],  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Schwaiger, Thomas
2018. The derivational nature of reduplication: Towards a Functional Discourse Grammar account of a non-concatenative morphological process. Word Structure 11:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Kok, Kasper
2016. The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture. Functions of Language 23:2  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Connolly, John H.
2015. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2020. Headedness and modification in Functional Discourse Grammar. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2015. The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2016. Dynamicity and dialogue. English Text Construction 9:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
O’Neill, Gareth
2015. Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Cornish, Francis
2014. "Agreement" as a perspectivizing device in discourse. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68],  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2014. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics 24:2  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 524 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.