This article presents a proposal for the organization of the Contextual Component in Functional Discourse Grammar. A guiding principle in this proposal is that, given the fact that Functional Discourse Grammar is a theory of grammar, the Contextual Component should provide the information that is necessary for a proper functioning of the grammar rather than aim at an exhaustive specification of all the information that plays a role in interpreting linguistic expressions. The Contextual Component contains situational and discursive information and is organized in different strata that correspond to the interpersonal, representational, morphosyntactic, and phonological levels of representation within the grammar. The contextual representations make use of the same formalizations as the corresponding linguistic representations, thus allowing for direct exchange of information between the Grammatical and the Contextual Components. Thus exchange of information is handled by an interface called the contextualizer. The article illustrates the functioning of this model by analyzing the role of contextual information with respect to three grammatical phenomena in three different languages: Unexpressed arguments in Turkish, English too, and answers to yes/no questions in European Portuguese.
Cornish, Francis (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In Gerry Wanders, and Evelien Keizer (eds), Web Papers in Functional Grammar WP-FDG-82, Special Issue: the London Papers I: 97-115. Available at: [URL].
Cruz, Aline da (2011) Fonologia e Gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. Utrecht: LOT.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1990) The origin of “mother-in-law vocabulary” in two Australian languages. Anthropological Linguistics 331: 1-56.
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah NY: Erlbaum. MetBib
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12.3: 175-204.
Hengeveld, Kees (2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-86.
Hengeveld, Kees (2012) Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34.4: 468-479.
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Öztürk, Balkız (2002) Turkish as a non-pro-drop language. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 239-259.
Rijkhoff, Jan (2008) Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Daniel García Velasco, and Jan Rijkhoff (eds), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-115.
Staden, Miriam van (2000) Tidore: A linguistic description of a language of the North Moluccas. Ph.D. dissertation. Leiden.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022. Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 512 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101273 ff.
KEIZER, EVELIEN
2020. The problem of non-truth-conditional, lower-level modifiers: a Functional Discourse Grammar solution. English Language and Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 365 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Scott A. Schwenter
2019. Echoic and non-echoic confirming affirmative responses in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 80 ff.
2018. The derivational nature of reduplication: Towards a Functional Discourse Grammar account of a non-concatenative morphological process. Word Structure 11:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 524 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.