Article In:
Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

The acquisition of locative inversion at the syntax-pragmatics interface by Chinese learners of English

ORCID logo | Harbin Engineering University
ORCID logo | Northeast Normal University
This study investigated the acquisition of English locative inversion at the syntax-pragmatics interface by Chinese learners, and explored the factors for non-native performance within the framework of the Interface Hypothesis. A picture description test and a context-matching test were administered through an online questionnaire to 300 Chinese learners of English and twenty native speakers of English at a university in China. Follow-up interviews were conducted with thirty Chinese learners. Results showed that (1) compared with English natives, Chinese learners under-produced locative inversion, achieving native-like attainment until the advanced stage; (2) they also displayed a different preference pattern for locative inversion, converging to a native-like pattern by the advanced stage; (3) non-native performance in production was attributed to processing limitations and input frequency, while that in interpretation resulted from underspecification of form-function mapping, input frequency and contexts. The paper offers implications for syntax-pragmatics teaching and proposes future directions for L2 interface studies.
Keywords: Interface Hypothesis, locative inversion, non-native performance, syntax-pragmatics interface, Chinese learners of English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1The interface hypothesis
    • 2.2The locative inversion at the syntax-pragmatics interface
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Research instruments
      • 3.2.1Picture description test
      • 3.2.2Context-matching test
      • 3.2.3Semi-structured interviews
    • 3.3Procedures
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Results of production of locative inversion
    • 4.2Results of interpretation of locative inversion
    • 4.3Results of factors for non-native performance
      • 4.3.1Production
      • 4.3.2Interpretation
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Discussion on production of locative inversion
    • 5.2Discussion on interpretation of locative inversion
    • 5.3Discussion on factors for non-native performance
      • 5.3.1Production
      • 5.3.2Interpretation
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (25)
References
Agathopoulou, Eleni. 2014. “Automatically Arises the Question Whether…: A Corpus Study of Postverbal Subjects in the Greek-English Interlanguage.” In Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, ed. by Nikolaos Lavidas, Thomaï Alexiou, and Areti Maria Sougari, 168–184. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Elisa Bennati, and Antonella Sorace. 2007. “Theoretical and Developmental Issues in the Syntax of Subjects: Evidence from Near-Native Italian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25 (4): 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Chiara Leonini. 2004. “Subject Inversion in L2 Italian.” In EUROSLA Yearbook, ed. by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Michael Sharwood Smith, Antonella Sorace, and Mitsuhiko Ota, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan (eds). 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 1994. “Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion.” Language 70 (2): 233–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Laura, and María J. Arche. 2014. “Subject Inversion in Non-Native Spanish.” Lingua 1451: 243–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gupton, Timothy, and Silvia Sánchez Calderón. 2023. “Focus at the Syntax-Discourse Interface in L2 Spanish: Optionality and Unaccusativity Reconsidered.” Second Language Research 39 (1): 185–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Jingquan. 2021. “The Syntactic Derivation of Locative Inversion Constructions in Mandarin Chinese.” Modern Foreign Languages 44 (5): 147–157.Google Scholar
Hertel, Tammy Jandrey. 2003. “Lexical and Discourse Factors in the Second Language Acquisition of Spanish Word Order.” Second Language Research 19 (4): 273–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Holger, Joseph Bail, and Carrie N. Jackson. 2020. “Frequency at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: A Bidirectional Study on Fronting Options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English.” Second Language Research 36 (1): 65–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Shan, and Huiping Zhang. 2022. “The Features and Factors in the Acquisition of English Existential Constructions at the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface by Chinese Learners.” Frontiers in Psychology 131: 983547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leal, Tania, and Bradley Hoot. 2022. “L2 Representation and Processing of Spanish Focus.” Language Acquisition 29 (4): 410–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, Cristóbal. 2006. “Focus and Split Intransitivity: The Acquisition of Word Order Alternations in Non-Native Spanish.” Second Language Research 22 (2): 145–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, Cristóbal, and Amaya Mendikoetxea. 2008. “Postverbal Subjects at the Interfaces in Spanish and Italian Learners of L2 English: A Corpus Analysis.” In Linking Up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, ed. by Gilquin Gaëtenelle, Szilivia Papp, and María Belén Díez-Bedmar, 85–125. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Interface Conditions on Postverbal Subjects: A Corpus Study of L2 English.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13 (4): 475–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margaza, Panagiota, and Anna Gavarró. 2022. “The Distribution of Subjects in L2 Spanish by Greek learners.” Frontiers in Psychology 121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya, and Cristóbal Lozano. 2018. “From Corpora to Experiments: Methodological Triangulation in the Study of Word Order at the Interfaces in Adult Late Bilinguals (L2 Learners).” Journal of Psycholinguist Research 47 (4): 871–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, Roumyana. 2015. “The Effect of Construction Frequency and Native Transfer on Second Language Knowledge of the Syntax-Discourse Interface.” Applied Psycholinguistics 36 (3): 671–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2011. “Pinning Down the Concept of ‘Interface’ in Bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Referring Expressions and Executive Functions in Bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6 (5): 669–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella, and Ludovica Serratrice. 2009. “Internal and External Interfaces in Bilingual Language Development: Beyond Structural Overlap.” International Journal of Bilingualism 13 (2): 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, Joana. 2020. “Gradient Optionality in L2 Acquisition at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Evidence from Inversion in Advanced and Near-Native English.” Lingua 2451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “The Impact of Explicit Instruction on Different Types of Linguistic Properties: Syntactic vs. Syntax-Discourse Properties.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 172 (1): 26–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Betty Birner. 2004. “Information Structure and Non-Canonical Syntax.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 153–174. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar