Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 25:3 (2015) ► pp. 321344

Full-text

Do hedges always hedge?
References
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel
(2011) Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics 43.1: 288–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
(2002) English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behnam, Biook, Amin Naeimi, and Ali Darvishzade
(2012) A comparative genre analysis of hedging expressions in research articles: Is fuzziness forever wicked? English Language and Literature Studies 2.2: 20–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
(1985) Modifiers as indicating devices: The case of requests. Theoretical Linguistics 12.2/3: 213–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
(1996) Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions (Topics in English Linguistics 19). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology 8). Cambridge, New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–310.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
(1999) On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31.7: 881–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Mitigation (Studies in Pragmatics 4). Amsterdam, Boston, Mass.: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
(1990) Precise and vague quantities in writing on economics. In Walter Nash (ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (Written Communication Annual 3). Newbury Park, Calif., London: Sage Publications, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar
(1994) Vague language (Describing English Language). Oxford, New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clemen, Gudrun
(1997) The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (Research in Text Theory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 24). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter & Co., pp. 235–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan
(ed.) (2007) Vague language explored. Houndmills, New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Defrancq, Bart, and Gert De Sutter
(2010) Contingency hedges in Dutch, French and English: A corpus-based contrastive analysis of the language-internal and -external properties of English depend, French dépendre and Dutch afhangen, liggen and zien . In Stefania Marzo, Kris Heylen, and Gert De Sutter (eds.), Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics (Special Issue of International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15.2). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 183–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
(2006) Hecken und Heckenausdrücke – Versuch einer Neudefinition. In Emilia Calaresu, Cristina Guardiano, and Klaus Hölker (eds.), Italienisch und Deutsch als Wissenschaftssprachen. Bestandsaufnahmen, Analysen, Perspektiven/Italiano e tedesco come lingue della comunicazione scientifica. Ricognizioni, analisi e prospettive (Romanistische Linguistik 7). Berlin, Münster: LIT Verlag, pp. 295–315.Google Scholar
Duszak, Anna
(1994) Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 21.3: 291–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
(2009)  Sort of and kind of in political discourse: Hedge, head of NP or contextualization cue? In Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29) (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 68). Amsterdam, New York, N.Y.: Editions Rodopi B.V., pp. 127–149.Google Scholar
(2010) Hedges in context: Form and function of sort of and kind of . In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging (Studies in Pragmatics 9). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 49–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
(2006) Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the volume. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (Studies in Pragmatics 1). Amsterdam, Boston, Mass.: Elsevier Ltd., pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
(1991) Pragmatic modifications on the ‘representative’ speech act of defining. Journal of Pragmatics 15.3: 253–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
(1975) Hedged performatives. In Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press, pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
(1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14.3: 383–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heider [Rosch], Eleanor
(1971) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. Unpublished paper. University of California, Berkeley.
Holmes, Janet
(1982) Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research 13.2: 9–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo 27: 47–62.Google Scholar
Hu, Guangwei, and Feng Cao
(2011) Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics 43.11: 2795–2809. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel
(1983) Understatements and hedges in English (Pragmatics and Beyond IV: 6). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 54). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itakura, Hiroko
(2013) Hedging praise in English and Japanese book reviews. Journal of Pragmatics 45.1: 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jalilifar, Alireza, and Maryam Alavi-Nia
(2012)  We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse and Communication 6.2: 135–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
(1972) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, and Gloria C. Phares (eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Chicago Linguistic Society 8). Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 183–228.Google Scholar
(1982) Categories and cognitive models (Linguistic Agency University Trier, series A, 96). Trier: Linguistic Agency University Trier.Google Scholar
(1986) Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley, and Karl-Erik McCullough (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory at the 22nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Chicago Linguistic Society 22, 2). Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 152–167.Google Scholar
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, Ill., London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markkanen, Raija, and Hartmut Schröder
(1997) Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (Research in Text Theory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 24). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter & Co., pp. 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
(2004) “They’re a little bit different”... Observations on hedges in academic talk. In Karin Aijmer, and Anna-Brita Stenström (eds.), Discourse patterns in spoken and written corpora (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 120). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 173–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne
(2008) “We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year”: Hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases. Discourse Studies 10.5: 635–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Paul G.
(1997) Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (Research in Text Theory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 24). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter & Co., pp. 21–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miodek, Jan
(1996) Jaka jesteś, polszczyzno? [What are you like, the Polish language?] (Z Prac Instytutu Filologii Polskiej Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego). Wrocław: Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Polonistyki Wroc- ławskiej.Google Scholar
Mišković-Luković, Mirjana
(2006) Semantika i pragmatika iskaza: Markeri diskursa u engleskom jeziku [The semantics and pragmatics of utterances: Discourse markers in English]. Beograd: Filološki Fakultet.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanja
(2012) Epistemic MUST and its cognates in German and Dutch. The subtle differences. Journal of Pragmatics (Special Issue – Modality at work: Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers) 44.15: 2150–2164.Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
(1998) The function of discourse particles: A study with special reference to spoken standard French (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 53). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
(1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikula, Tarja
(1997) Interlanguage view on hedging. In Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (Research in Text Theory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 24). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter & Co., pp. 188–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pęzik, Piotr
(2012) Dane mówione w NKJP [Spoken data in the NKJP (Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego/The National Corpus of Polish)]. In Adam Przepiórkowski, Mirosław Bańko, Rafał L. Górski, and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, pp. 272–273.Google Scholar
Poveda Cabanes, Paloma
(2007) A contrastive analysis of hedging in English and Spanish architecture project descriptions. RESLA (Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada) 20: 139–158.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader, and Charles Bosk
(1982) On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Robert J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies (Advances in Discourse Processes 8). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
(1990) Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 14.3: 367–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(2004) Lectures on repair and categorization (244b/266 Conversational Structures II), University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
(1999) Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 107.3/4: 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Hartmut, and Dagmar Zimmer
(1997) Hedging research in pragmatics: A bibliographical research guide to hedging. In Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (Research in Text Theory/Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie 24). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter & Co., pp. 249–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
(2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction (Language in Society). Oxford, Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar
Słownik języka polskiego
[The dictionary of Polish] (2013) Jakby [(As) if/Like]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. http://​sjp​.pwn​.pl​/szukaj​/jakby (accessed 15 October 2013).Google Scholar
Szymczak, Mieczysław
(ed.) (1978) Słownik języka polskiego [The dictionary of Polish]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Tchizmarova, Ivelina K.
(2005) Hedging functions of the Bulgarian discourse marker xajde . Journal of Pragmatics 37.8: 1143–1163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varttala, Teppo
(1999) Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes 18.2: 177–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vass, Holly
(2004) Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres. Ibérica 7: 125–141.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
(1966) On the semantic structure of English. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language (MIT Press Classics), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 142–217.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1991) Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 53). Berlin, New York, N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yang, Yingli
(2013) Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 50.1: 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zadeh, Lotfi A.
(1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8.3: 338–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1971) Quantitative fuzzy semantics. Information Sciences 3.2: 159–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuck, Joyce G., and Louis V. Zuck
(1985) Hedging in newswriting. In Anne-Marie Cornu, Johan Vanparjis, Mieke Delahaye, and Lut Baten (eds.), Beads or bracelet? How do we approach LSP? Selected papers from the 5th European Symposium on LSP. Leuven: Oxford University Press, pp. 172–180.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Adamczyk, Magdalena
2017.  In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],  pp. 369 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.