Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.33–56

The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China

| University of Huddersfield
In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.
Keywords: Evaluation, (In)appropriateness, Offence, Ideology, Confucianism
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.02kad
References (48)
Bell, Daniel A. 2010. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C.Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucknall, Kevin. 2002. Chinese Business Etiquette and Culture. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cameron, Deborah. 2004. “Out of the Bottle: The Social Life of Metalanguage.” In Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. By Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Daríusz Glasínsky, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Wang-Tsit. 1963. A Sourcebook of Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Xinyin, Qi Dong, and Hong Zhou. 1997. “Authoritative and Authoritarian Parenting Practices and Social and School Performance in Chinese Children.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 21 (4): 855–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (ed.). 1969. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Tony. 1999. Chinese Business Negotiating Style. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. “Confucianism and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 6 (2): 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies.” Discourse & Society 17 (6): 715–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016 forthcoming. The Metapragmatics of (Im)Politeness. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
He, Amy Yun. 2012. “Different Generations, Different Face? A Discursive Approach to Naturally Occurring Compliment Responses in Chinese.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 29–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Stuart. 2000. “What is School Violence? An Integrated Definition.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 567 (1): 16–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, Beverly. 1985. “Politeness in Chinese: Interpersonal Pronouns and Personal Greetings.” Anthropological Linguistics 27 (2): 204–213.Google Scholar
Huang, Yongliang. 2008. “Politeness Principle in Cross-culture Communication.” Retrieved from: [URL]. DOI logo
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson (eds.). 1999. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and The Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Leng. 2005. “Chinese Cultural Schema of Education: Implications for Communication between Chinese Students and Australian Educators.” Issues in Educational Research 15 (1): 17–36.Google Scholar
Jin, Lixian, and Martin Cortazzi. 2006. “Changing Practices in Chinese Cultures of Learning.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 19 (1): 5–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, John W. 1997. The Struggle for Student Rights: Tinker v. Des Moines and the 1960s. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007. Terms of (Im)Politeness. Budapest: Eötvös Lorand University Press.Google Scholar
2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Leveraging Relational Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kass, Leon R. 1990. “Practicing Ethics: Where is the Action?” Hastings Center Report 20 (1): 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Michelle L., and Hui-Mei Tseng. 1992. “Cultural Differences in Child Rearing: A Comparison of Immigrant Chinese and Caucasian American Mothers.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23 (4): 444–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Tianbo, and Gillian Owen Moreira. 2009. The Influence of Confucianism and Buddhism on Chinese Business: A Case of Aveiro, Portugal. Retrieved from: [URL]
Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, K.C. Patrick. 2010. “Confucius, Customer Service, and Service Excellence.” Conflict Resolution & Negotiation 41: 53–61.Google Scholar
呂叔湘 Lü, Shuxiang 1985. 近代漢語指代詞 Jindai hanyu zhidaici [The pronouns of vernacular Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2000. Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. London: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2012. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sargent, Tanja Carmel. 2009. “Revolutionizing Ritual Interaction in the Classroom: Constructing the Chinese Renaissance of the Twenty-first Century.” Modern China 35 (6): 632–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoenhals, Martin. 1993. The Paradox of Power in a People’s Republic of China Middle School. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Fengyan. 2004. “Confucian Thinking in Traditional Moral Education: Key Ideas and Fundamental Features.” Journal of Moral Education 33 (4): 429–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang Xuan, Kasper Juffermans, and Caixia Du. 2015. “Harmony as Language Policy in China: An Internet Perspective.” Language Policy. Retrieved from: [URL]
Watson, Burton (trans.) 1999. The Zen Teachings of Master Lin-Chi: A Translation of the Lin-chi Lu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yum, June Ock. 1988. “The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia.” Communication Monographs 55 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Guogang. 2007. “Relationship between Parents and Children in the Tang Dynasty.” Journal of Chinese Literature and History 31: 207–249.Google Scholar
Zhang, Tong, and Barry Schwartz. 1997. “Confucius and the Cultural Revolution: A Study in Collective Memory.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 11 (2): 189–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Yunxia. 2009. “Confucian Ethics Exhibited in the Discourse of Chinese Business and Marketing Communication.” Journal of Business Ethics 881: 517–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Chen, Qiuxu, Yidan Gao, Yuchi Zhang & Juan Wang
2024. The mediating effects of basic psychological needs on the associations between teacher support and Chinese adolescents’ science and math self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Le, Thanh Thao, Hoang Yen Phuong, Trut Thuy Pham, Ngoc Bao-Chau Tran & Thi Thuy-Linh Nguyen
2024. Exploring the cultural portrayal of Vietnamese teachers: an analytical study of professional identity in Vietnamese teaching-themed songs. F1000Research 13 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey
2021. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Evaluating the appropriacy of Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs): A case study of learners of Chinese and English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xinren
2019. ‘Family-culture’ and Chinese politeness. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:2 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
McConachy, Troy
2019. L2 pragmatics as ‘intercultural pragmatics’: Probing sociopragmatic aspects of pragmatic awareness. Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.