This study explores metapragmatic comments in Nigerian quasi-judicial public hearings, involving interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel, with a view to investigating their forms, features, distribution and functions. The data are analysed quantitatively and qualitatively from a discourse-pragmatic framework that incorporates Verschueren’s theory of metapragmatics, Mey’s pragmatic act theory, Grice’s Cooperative Principle and conversation analysis. Four types of metapragmatic comments are used: speech act descriptions, talk regulation comments, maxim adherence/violation related comments and metalinguistic comments. Their distribution and functioning are shown to be partly predictable from properties of the speech event, while they also co-determine the nature and development of the analysed hearings.
Blum-Kulka, S., and H. Sheffer. 1993. “The Metapragmatic Discourse of American-Israeli Families at Dinner.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka, 196–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bock, Zanni. 2007. A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of the Western Cape.
Bock, Zanni. 2008. “‘Language has a Heart’: Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC Testimonies.”Language of Multicultural Discourses 3 (3): 189–203.
Bock, Z., N. Mazwi, S. Metula, and N. Mpolweni-Zantsi. 2006. “An Analysis of what has been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.”Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 331: 1–26.
Brinton, J. Laurel. 2008. Comment Clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caffi, Claudia. 1998. Metapragmatics. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by J.L. Mey, 581–585. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Hübler, Abel. 2007. “On the Metapragmatics of Gestures.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 107–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hübler, A., and W. Bublitz. 2007. “Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 1–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn Taking for Conversation.”Language 50 (4): 696 – 735.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. “Face (Im)politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by H. Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London/New York: Continuum.
Unuabonah, O. Foluke. 2012. “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.”California Linguistic Notes 37 (1): 1–23.
Unuabonah, O. Foluke. 2016. “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing.”Journal of Asian and African Studies, 51(5): 619–633.
Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009a. “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC.”Discourse Studies 11 (4): 441–463.
Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009b. “Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse.”Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 297–309.
2018. Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings
. Text & Talk 38:4 ► pp. 503 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.