Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.115143
References
Aijmer, Karin
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Berlin, N. Lawrence
2007“Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and appropriateness, ed. by A. Fetzer, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and H. Sheffer
1993“The Metapragmatic Discourse of American-Israeli Families at Dinner.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka, 196–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Zanni
2007A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
2008“‘Language has a Heart’: Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC Testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3 (3): 189–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011“Code-switching: An Appraisal Resource in TRC Testimonies.” Functions of Language 18 (2): 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Z., N. Mazwi, S. Metula, and N. Mpolweni-Zantsi
2006“An Analysis of what has been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 331: 1–26.Google Scholar
Brinton, J. Laurel
2008Comment Clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1998Metapragmatics. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by J.L. Mey, 581–585. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Carranza, E. Isolda
2008“Metapragmatics in a Courtroom Genre.” Pragmatics 18 (2): 169–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ciliberti, A. , and L. Anderson
2007“Metapragmatic Comments in Institutional Talk. A Comparative Analysis across Settings.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 143–166. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Boel
2004“‘Don’t say it’s disgusting!’ Comments on Socio-Moral Behavior in Swedish Families.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1705–1725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grundy, Peter
2008Doing Pragmatics. (3rd edn). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut
2007“Language Shift in Conversation as a Metapragmatic Comment.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 129–142. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hongladoram, Krisadawan
2007“’Don’t blame me for criticising you…’: A Study of Metapragmatic Comments in Thai.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 29–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Abel
2007“On the Metapragmatics of Gestures.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 107–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, A., and W. Bublitz
2007“Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 1–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco
Janney, W. Richard
2007“‘So your story now is that…’: Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom Interrogation.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 223–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinig, Bob
1998 “Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them.” MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from [URL]
Mey, L. Jacob
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2007“A Metapragmatic Examination of Therapist Reformulations.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 235–262. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penz, Hermine
2007“Building Common Ground through Metapragmatic Comments in International Project Work.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 263–292. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara
2007“Facework and Multiple Selves in Apologetic Metapragmatic Comments in Japanese.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 49–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
1974“A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696 – 735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.W., and X. Liang
2007“Metapragmatic Expressions in Physics Lectures: Integrating Representations, Guiding Processing, and Assigning Participant Roles.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 167–199. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2008“Face (Im)politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by H. Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stude, Juliane
2007“The Acquisition of Metapragmatic Abilities in Preschool Children.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 199–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2007“Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interaction.”. In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 87–106. ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unuabonah, O. Foluke
2012“The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
2016“Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 51(5): 619–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelies
2009a“The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC.” Discourse Studies 11 (4): 441–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b“Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 297–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bamgbose, Ganiu & Erhuvwu Akpomerha
2023. An Analysis of Selected Supreme Court Rulings on Human Rights Violation in Nigeria. Language Matters 54:2  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2017. Butas a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Pragmatics and Society 8:3  pp. 400 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke O.
2018. Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Text & Talk 38:4  pp. 503 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.