Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Skype and domestic settings: Interpersonal video communication as a site of human sociality
Edited by Richard Harper, Rod Watson and Christian Licoppe
[Pragmatics 27:3] 2017
► pp. 301–318
Introduction

Interpersonal video communication as a site of human sociality

A special issue of Pragmatics

| Social Shaping Research, Cambridge
| Telecom ParisTech, Paris
| Telecom ParisTech, Paris
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Perspectives on mediated communications
  • 3.The need for a different approach
  • 4.Evidence from within
  • 5.The purpose of this special issue
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 16 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.3.01har
References (34)
References
Arminen, I. 2005. “Sequential Order and Sequence Structure: The Case of Incommensurable Studies on Mobile Phone Calls.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 649–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. 2000. From Alphabet to Email. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gersheim. 2014. Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, B., N. Green, and R. Harper (eds). 2001. Wireless World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Mobile Age. Hiedleberg and Godalming: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Brubaker, J., G. Venolia, and J. Tang. 2012. “Focusing on Shared Experiences: Moving Beyond the Camera in Video Communication.” Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2012) June 11–15th. Newcastle, UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fornel, M. 1994. “Le Cadre Interactionnel de l’Echange Visiophonique.” Réseaux 641: 107–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frobenius, M., and R. Harper. 2015. “Tying in Comment Sections: The Production of Meaning and Sense on Facebook.” Semiotica 2041: 121–143.Google Scholar
Garcia, A., and J. Jacobs. 1999. “The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 32 (4): 337–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harper, R. 2009. “From TelePresence to Human Absence – The Pragmatic Construction of the Human in Communications Systems Research.” Proceedings, 23rd Annual Conference of the British HCI Group (HCI 2009): 73–82.Google Scholar
2011. Texture: Human Expression in the Age of Communications Overload. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harper, R., L. Palen, and A. Talyor (eds.). 2005. The Inside Text: Social Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., and P. Luff. 1992. “Media Space and Communicative Asymmetries. Preliminary Observations of Video Mediated Interactions.” Human Computer Interaction 71: 315–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C., and J. Androutsopoulos. 2015. “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysiss, Second edition, ed. by D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin, 127–151. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C., D. Stein, and T. Virtanen. 2013. “Introduction.” In Pragmatics of Computer – Mediated Communication, 3–34, Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., and S. Barnett. 2005. “Aspects of the Sequential Organization of Mobile Phone Conversation.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. 2006. Magic in the Air: Mobile Communication and the Transformation of Social Life. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Katz, J., and Aakhus (eds.). 2003. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, D., A. Sellen, and X. Cao. 2010. “Home Video Communication: Mediating ‘Closeness’.” Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, C., and J. Morel. 2012. “Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research in Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 399–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Mundane Video Directors. Showing one’s Environment in Skype and Mobile Video Calls.” In Video@Work, ed. by M. Broth, E. Laurier, and L. Mondada, 135–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, D., and J. Sinanan. 2014. Webcam. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Madianou, M., and D. Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. 2010. “Eröffnung und Vor-Eröffnung in technisch vermittelter interaktion: Videokonferenzen.” In Situationeröffnungen: Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by L. M. R. Schmitt, 217–334. Tubingen, Narr.Google Scholar
Neustaedter, C., and S. Greenberg. 2011. “Intimacy in Long Distance Relationships over Video Chat.” Proceedings of CHI 2012, ACM Press.Google Scholar
Relieu, M. 2007. “La Téléprésence, ou l’Autre Visiophonie.” Réseaux 1441: 183–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R., M. Frobenius, and R. Harper. 2013. “From Small Stories to Networked Narrative: The Evolution of Personal Narratives in Facebook Status Updates.” Narrative Inquiry 23 (1): 192–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, D. J. 1999. Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rintel, S., R. Harper, and K. O’Hara. 2016. “The Tyranny of the Everyday in Mobile Video Messaging.” Proceedings of CHI’16. San Jose: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vols. 1 & 111. Ed by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 2007. “Sequence Organization in Interaction.” A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunakawa, C. 2012. “Japanese Family via Webcam: An Ethnographic Study of Cross-Spatial Interactions.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 72581, ed. by M. Okumura, D. Bekki, and K. Satoh, 264–276. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Siitonen, Pauliina, Marika Helisten, Maarit Siromaa, Mirka Rauniomaa & Mari Holmström
2022. Managing co-presence with a wave of the hand. Gesture 21:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2021. Polymedia in interaction. Pragmatics and Society 12:5 ► pp. 707 ff. DOI logo
Martins Ferreira, Dina Maria & Jony Kellson de Castro Silva
2021. Chapter 8. The adaptability of becoming. In The Pragmatics of Adaptability [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 319], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Afzaal, Muhammad & Muhammad Ilyas Chishti
2020. Chris Shei (ed.),The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 19:1 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Eisenmann, Clemens
2020. Soziotechnische Intimität und wechselseitige Wahrnehmung bei Verabschiedungen in der familialen Videotelefonie mit Kindern. In Digitale Kindheiten [Medien der Kooperation – Media of Cooperation, ], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Gan, Yumei, Christian Greiffenhagen & Christian Licoppe
2020. Die Eröffnung von Videoanrufen in Migrantenfamilien: Wie Großeltern ‚sprechende Köpfe‘-Begegnungen zwischen Kindern und ihren migrierten Eltern in China organisieren. In Digitale Kindheiten [Medien der Kooperation – Media of Cooperation, ], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Stommel, Wyke, Harry van Goor & Martijn Stommel
2019. Other-Attentiveness in Video Consultation Openings: A Conversation Analysis of Video-Mediated Versus Face-to-Face Consultations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.