Image-based topical talk and intimacy in video-mediated family communication
Moustafa Zouinar |
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, and Orange Labs Paris
Julia Velkovska |
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales and Orange Labs, Paris
This paper focuses on how conversation and a shared participation frame are maintained in video-mediated family conversations which ordinarily do not have a particular agenda. In order to examine this question, how conversations are maintained whilst being sometimes improvised, the paper analyses a particular interactional phenomenon, namely, the image-based topic management accomplished via two methods: showings and noticings. Through a detailed multimodal analysis of family video mediated conversations, it shows how these methods are used for introducing or changing topics and hence sustaining talk. Moreover, by describing the practical actions that involve technological and social dimensions, the paper highlights the link between interaction, personal relationships and technology. The analysis of showings and noticings, enabled by the technical features of the systems used by the participants, reveals how video-communication technology is mobilized by family members as a resource for maintaining intimacy in distant relationships.
1980 “ ‘Occasionality’ as a Constituent Feature of the Known-in-Common Character of Topics”. Human Studies 31: 47–64.
Button, G., and N. Casey
1984 “Generating Topic: The Use of Topic Initial Elicitors.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 165–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(ed.)2000Small talk. Essex, UK: Longman Harlow.
Coupland, J., and A. Jaworski
2003 “Transgression and Intimacy in Reconnaitre Talk Narratives.” Research on Language and Social interaction 361: 85–106.
Drew, P., and K. Chilton
2000 “Calling just to Keep in Touch: Regular and Habitualised Telephone Calls as an Environment for Small Talk.” In Small talk, ed. by J. Coupland, 137–162. Essex, UK: Longman Harlow.
1964 “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist 661: 133–6.
1978a “What’s in a ‘Nyem’?” Sociology 12 (1): 135–139.
1978b “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by J. N. Schenkein, 213–248. New York: Academic Press.
Kirk, D., A. Sellen, and X. Cao
2010 “Home Video Communication: Mediating Closeness.” Proceedings of CSCW: ACM Press: pp. 135–144.
Levinson, S. C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Licoppe, C., and J. Morel
2014 “Mundane Video Directors in Interaction. Showing One’s Environment in Skype and Mobile Video Calls.” In M. Broth, E. Laurier, and L. Mondada (eds.), Studies of Video Practices, Video at Work, 135–160. London: Routledge.
Maynard, D. W.
1980 “Placement of Topic Choices in Conversation.” Semiotica 301: 263–290.
Maynard, D. W., and D. H. Zimmerman
1984 “Topical Talk, Ritual and the Social Organization of Relationships.” Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 471: 301–316.
2007 “La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie.” In «De la rue au tribunal. Etudes sur la visiocommunication. Réseaux 1441, ed. by C. Licoppe, and M. Relieu, 183–224. Paris: Hermès.
Radford, J. and C. Tarplee
2000 “The Management of Conversational Topic by a Ten Year Old Child with Pragmatic Difficulties.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 141: 5.
1992Lectures on Conversation. 21 vol., ed. by G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary.’” In Structures of social action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A.
1990 “The Organization of Sequences as a Source of Coherence in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by B. Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
2012 “Japanese Family via Webcam: An Ethnographic Study of Cross-Spatial Interactions.” In Lecture Notes, in Computer Science, vol. 72581, ed. by M. Okumura, D. Bekki, and K. Satoh, 264–276. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Cited by 4 other publications
Boudouraki, Andriana, Stuart Reeves, Joel E Fischer & Sean Rintel
2022. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff.
2021. Hyperembodiment. Cognitive Semiotics 14:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Shaw, Sara E, Deborah Cameron, Joseph Wherton, Lucas M Seuren, Shanti Vijayaraghavan, Satyajit Bhattacharya, Christine A’Court, Joanne Morris & Trisha Greenhalgh
2018. Technology-Enhanced Consultations in Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart Failure: Protocol for the Qualitative Analysis of Remote Consultations (QuARC) Project. JMIR Research Protocols 7:7 ► pp. e10913 ff.
Siitonen, Pauliina, Mirka Rauniomaa & Tiina Keisanen
2021. Language and the Moving Body: Directive Actions With the Finnish kato “look” in Nature-Related Activities. Frontiers in Psychology 12
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.