Digital technologies are likely to be appropriated by the homeless just as they are by other segments of society. However, these appropriations will reflect the particularities of their circumstances. What are these appropriations? Are they beneficial or effective? Can Skype, as a case in point, assuage the social disconnection that must be, for many, the experience of being homeless? This paper analyses some evidence about these questions and, in particular, the ways communications media are selected, oriented to and accounted for by the homeless young. Using data from a small corpus of interviews, it examines the specific ways in which choice of communication (face-to-face, social media, or video, etc.), are described by these individuals as elected for tactical and strategic reasons having to do with managing their family relations. These relations are massively important both in terms of how communications media are deployed, and in terms of being one of the sources of the homeless state the young find themselves in. The paper examines some of the methodical ways these issues are articulated and the type of ‘causal facticity’ thereby constituted in interview talk. The paper also remarks on the paradoxical problem that technologies like Skype provide: at once allowing people in the general to communicate but in ways that the homeless young want to resist in the particular. The consequences of this for the shaping of communications technology in the future are remarked upon.
1923The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man. Chicago: Chicago Council of Social Agencies.
Aronsson, K., and A. Cekaite
2011 “Activity Contracts and Directives in Everyday Family Politics.” Discourse and Society 22 (2): 137–54.
1998a “Just Another Night in a Shooting Gallery.” Theory, Culture and Society 15 (2): 37–66.
1998b “The Moral Economies of Homeless Heroin Addicts: Confronting Ethnography, H.I.V. Risk and Everyday Violence in San Francisco Shooting Encampments.” Substance Use and Misuse 33 (11): 2323–51.
1996The Rise of the Networked Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. I. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
1997The Power of Identity, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. II. Cambridge, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
1998End of Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. III. Cambridge, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Duranti, A., and C. Goodwin
1992 “Editors’ Introduction”, Rethinking Context, ed. by A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzgerald, R., and W. Housley
2015Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage.
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, H., G. Girton, E. Livingston, and H. Sacks
No date. Studies of Kids’ Culture and Kids’ Talk. Manuscript.
Garfinkel, H., and H. Sacks
1970 “On Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” In Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, ed. by J. C. McKinney, and E. A. Tiryakian, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1–2): 1–29.
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
2011Texture: Human Expression in the Age of Communication Overload. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Horst, H. A., and D. Miller
2006The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication. Oxford/New York: Berg.
2011Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge.
2012 “Fixed in Mobility-Young Homeless People and the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (4): 725–41.
Katz, J., and M. Aakhus
2002Perpetual Contact: Mobile communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2013An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. (Trans C. Porter). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
2013More Studies in Ethnomethodology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Maynard, D. W.
1988 “Language, Interaction, and Social Problems.” Social Problems 351: 311–334.
Miller, D., and J. Sinina
2014Webcam. Cambridge: Polity Press.
1960 “The English Record of a Natural Sociology.” American Sociological Review 251: 193–208.
1972a “On the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by D. Sudnow. New York: The Free Press.
1972b “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Dell Hymes. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by G. R. Button, and J. R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
1992Lectures on Conversation. Volumes I & II1. Malden: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Sacks, H., and E. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Press.
1969 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 701: 1075–95.
1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in social interaction, ed. by D. Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.
1995 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omni-relevance of Action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 185–213.
2005 “On Complainability.” Social Problems 521: 449–476.
Schegloff, E. A., and H. Sacks
1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 81: 280–327.
1971 “The Everyday World of the Child.” In Understanding everyday life, ed. by J. Douglas, 188–217. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Spradley, J. P.
1970You Owe Yourself a Drunk: An Ethnography of Urban Nomads. Boston: Little, Brown.
2015 “De-Reifying Categories.” In Advances in membership categorization analysis, ed. by R. Fitzgerald, and W. Housely, 23–49. Los Angeles: Sage.
Woelfer, J., and D. Hendry
2010 “Homeless Young People’s Experiences with Information Systems: Life and Work in a Community Technology Center.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 20101, pp. 1291–1300.
Woelfer, J., and D. Hendry
2011 “Homeless Young People and Living with Personal Digital Artifacts.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 20111, ACM Press, pp. 1697–1706.
Yoo, D., A. Huldtgren, J. Woelfer, F. Hendry, and B. Friedman
2013 “A value Sensitive Action-Reflection Model: Evolving a Co-Design Space with Stakeholder and Designer Prompts” Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2013, ACM Press, pp. 419–428.
Cited by 4 other publications
Abel, Susan, Tanya Machin & Charlotte Brownlow
2021. Social media, rituals, and long-distance family relationship maintenance: A mixed-methods systematic review. New Media & Society 23:3 ► pp. 632 ff.
Davis-Owusu, Kadian, Evans Owusu, Lucio Marcenaro, Carlo Regazzoni, Loe Feijs & Jun Hu
2019. Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Behavioural Implications of Bidirectional Activity-Based Ambient Displays in Ambient Assisted Living Environments. In Enhanced Living Environments [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11369], ► pp. 108 ff.
Harper, Richard, Sean Rintel, Rod Watson & Kenton O’Hara
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.