Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics
Vol. 4:2 (1994) ► pp.139–181

Register and the redemption of relevance theory

The case of metaphor

The argument I wish to advance in this paper is that Gricean theory (Grice 1968, 1969, 1975, 1978, 1981) and, in particular, the potentially useful relevance theory which developed from it (Sperber & Wilson 1986), are flawed through their failure to consider cultural and social context; but that attempts to relate linguistic pragmatics to more socially-conscious models of language use, such as register/genre theory (Ure and Ellis 1977; Halliday 1978; Gregory and Carroll 1978; Ghadessy 1988, 1993; Swales 1988; Martin 1985, 1992 etc.) may produce interesting cross-fertilization and be beneficial to both. This essay falls into three sections. The first is a brief introductory critique of Grice's theory as an asocial idealized construct. The second section brings relevance theory and genre/register theory face to face and under the spotlight, hoping to reveal the weaknesses of each and show how, theoretically, they could compensate for and complement each other. In the third section I consider the case of metaphor, arguing that and demonstrating how the account of metaphor provided in Relevance: Communication and Cognition can be supplemented in practice by considering the kinds of register/genre in which metaphors find expression.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.4.2.05goa
References (78)
Bateson, G. (1991) Men are grass: Metaphor and the world of mental process. In A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Cornelia and Michael, pp. 237-42Google Scholar
Bauman, R., and J. Scherzer (eds.) (1974) Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Beaugrande, R. de, and W. Dressier (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V.K. (1983) An applied discourse analysis of English legislative writing. University of Aston.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1989) Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237-244Google Scholar
Brown, P., and S. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. (1987) Vocabulary. London: Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982) Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 35-53Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1987) Relevance to what? Behavioural and Brain Sciences 10.4: 714-5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, A., and E. Loftus (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Research 821: 407-428.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., and D. Davy (1969) Investigating English style. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(1975) Advanced conversational English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul (1979) The epistemology of metaphor. In S. Sacks (ed.), On metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-28.Google Scholar
Doheny-Farina, S., and L. Odell (1985) Ethnographic research on writing; Assumptions and methodology. In L. Odell, and D. Goswami (eds.), Writing in non-academic settings. New York: Guilford, pp. 503-55.Google Scholar
Dyer, G. (1982) Advertising as communication. London: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W. (1981) Spc cen discourse: A model for analysis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. (1989) Reading between the lines: Building a comprehensive model of participant reference in real narrative. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham.
. (1992) Splitting the referent: An introduction to narrative enactors. In M. Davies and L. Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Empson, William (1953) Seven types of ambiguity. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and power. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1977) Frame semantics and the nature of language. In S. Hamad, H. Stecklis, and J. Lancaster (eds.), Origin and evolution of language and speech. New York Academy of Sciences vol. 2801.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1960) Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Strachey, J. (trans.) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
fies, P. (1991) The structuring of information in written English text. Paper delivered at the 18th nternational Systemic Congress. Tokyo, Japan.
Ghadessy, M. (ed.) (1988) Registers of written English. London: Pinter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.P. (1987) Interrelations of metaphors in Golding’s novels: A framework for the study of metaphoric interplay. Language and Style 20.2: 125-144.Google Scholar
. (1993) Species of metaphor in varieties of English. In M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
. (in preparation) Aspects of metaphors.
Gregory, M., and S. Carroll (1978) Language and situation. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, P. (1957) Meaning. Philosophical Review 661: 377-88. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
. (1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 113-128.Google Scholar
. (1981) Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 183-198.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.J, T.C. Jupp, and C. Roberts (1979) Crosstalk: A study of cross-cultural communication. London: The National Centre for Industrial Language Training.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as social semiotic. London: Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
. (1985) Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and R. Hasan (1985) Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, R (1989) Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987) The body in the mind. London: University of Chicago Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (1985) Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.N. (1969) A Linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1989) Review of “Relevance: Communication and cognition”. Journal of Linguistics 25.2: 455-473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.R. (1985) Factual writing. Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Martin. J.R. (1992) English text; system and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1960) Elements of general linguistics. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. (1993) Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In M. Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter, pp. 221-292.Google Scholar
Mey, J., and M. Talbot (1988) Computation and the soul. Journal of Pragmatics 121: 5-6. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, pp. 211-277.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., and F.H. Syder (1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J.C. Richards, & R.W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication. London: Longman, pp. 191-227.Google Scholar
Pike, K. (1982) Linguistic concepts: An introduction to tagmemics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M.L. (1981) The ideology of speech act theory. Centrum (new series) vol 11.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A., and J.M. Lawler (1981) Athematic metaphors. In Papers from the seventeenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 17) Chicago Illinois, pp. 318-42.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1978) Orientalism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanford, A.J., and S.C. Garrod (1981) Understanding written language. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S., and S. Slembrouck (1992) Non-cooperation in communication: A reassessment of Gricean pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 171: 117-153. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1982) The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schänk, R., and R. Abclson (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.M., and M. Coulthard (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1987) Presumptions of relevance. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 10.4: 736-54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steiner, G. (1975) After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J., and R. Quirk (1980) (eds.) A corpus of English conversation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990) Genre analysis; English in academic and research settings. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. London: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Trimble, L. (1985) English for science and technology. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ure, J., and J. Ellis (1977) Register in decriptive linguisties and linguistic sociology. In O. Oribe-Villas (ed.). Issues in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 197-243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijsen, L.M.P.T. (1980) Cognition and image formation m literature. Frankfurt: Peter D. Lang.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1985) Some applications of systemic grammar to TEFL or whatever became of register analysis? In J.D. Benson, and W. Greaves (eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse volume 2. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 282-294.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Li, Jincheng
2023. How Metaphor Strategies Work in Particular Internet Context Based on Grice's Non-natural Meaning Theory. BCP Education & Psychology 9 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Pescuma, Valentina N., Dina Serova, Julia Lukassek, Antje Sauermann, Roland Schäfer, Aria Adli, Felix Bildhauer, Markus Egg, Kristina Hülk, Aine Ito, Stefanie Jannedy, Valia Kordoni, Milena Kuehnast, Silvia Kutscher, Robert Lange, Nico Lehmann, Mingya Liu, Beate Lütke, Katja Maquate, Christine Mooshammer, Vahid Mortezapour, Stefan Müller, Muriel Norde, Elizabeth Pankratz, Angela G. Patarroyo, Ana-Maria Pleşca, Camilo R. Ronderos, Stephanie Rotter, Uli Sauerland, Gohar Schnelle, Britta Schulte, Gediminas Schüppenhauer, Bianca Maria Sell, Stephanie Solt, Megumi Terada, Dimitra Tsiapou, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Melanie Weirich, Heike Wiese, Kathy Zaruba, Lars Erik Zeige, Anke Lüdeling & Pia Knoeferle
2023. Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, and cultural aspects: Evidence from complementary methods. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Laval, Virginie & Josie Bernicot
2022.  “Tu es dans la lune” . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Egg, Markus
2020. To those walking in the footsteps of the faith. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Skorczynska, Hanna & Rosa Giménez-Moreno
2017. Analysing metaphor in the family register through scripted sitcom conversations. Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Tsiplakou, Stavroula & Georgios Floros
2013. Never mind the text types, here's textual force: Towards a pragmatic reconceptualization of text type. Journal of Pragmatics 45:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Galiñanes, Cristina Larkin
2005. Funny Fiction; Or, Jokes and Their Relation to the Humorous Novel. Poetics Today 26:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Yus Ramos, Francisco
1998. A decade of relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 30:3 ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
1996. Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. Language Sciences 18:3-4 ► pp. 629 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Understanding Conversational Joking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 310], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.