Article published In:
Conflict and violence in pragmatic research
Edited by Charles L. Briggs
[Pragmatics 7:4] 1997
► pp. 451459
References (28)
Aarsleff, Hans (1982) From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard & Charles L. Briggs (1997) Authorizing discourse: The creation of power in scholarly and popular discourse. Ms. in possession of authors.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. (ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and inequality. New Y ork: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, & Kathryn A. W oolard (1995) Constructing languages and publics. Special issue of Pragmatics, vol. 5, no. 2.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1991) Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) — an announcement of studies. In Graham Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1996) Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Yrjö Engelström and David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61-95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.) (1990) Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gruner, Rolf (1977) Theory and power: On the character of modern sciences. Amsterdam: B. R. Gruner.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1963) From Galileo to Newton, 1630–1720. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, & J. Maxwell Atkinson (1984) Introduction. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 1-15.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1968[1651]) The Leviathan. C.B. MacPherson (ed.). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. & Talbot J. Taylor (eds.) (1990) Ideologies of language. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lee, John R.E. (1987) Prologue: Talking organisation. In Graham Button and John R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 19-53.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1959[1690]) An essay concerning human understanding. (2 vols.) New York: Dover.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C.B. (1962) The political theory of possessive individualism: From Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Patricia (ed.) (1995) Discourse of violence. Special issue of Discourse & Society vol. 61, no. 13.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1949) The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Psathas, George (1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1984) Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action : Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 21-27.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emannuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1959[1916]).A course in general linguistics. C. Bally and A. Schehaye (eds.); Wade Baskin (trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.) (in press) Language ideologies. New York: Oxford University Press DOI logo
Silverstein, Michael (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-55.Google Scholar
(1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Adams, Karen L.
2022. Deliberate dispute and the construction of oppositional stance. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
McElhinny, Bonnie
2022. Fearful, forceful agents of the law. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Wasson, Christina
2022. Caution and consensus in American business meetings. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Lempert, Michael
2007. Conspicuously past: Distressed discourse and diagrammatic embedding in a Tibetan represented speech style. Language & Communication 27:3  pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Lempert, Michael P.
2006. Disciplinary theatrics: Public reprimand and the textual performance of affect at Sera Monastery, India. Language & Communication 26:1  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Morales-López, Esperanza, Gabriela Prego-Vázquez & Luzia Domínguez-Seco
2005. Interviews between employees and customers during a company restructuring process. Discourse & Society 16:2  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Zeitlyn, David
2003. The Talk Goes Outside: Argument, Privacy and Power in Mambila Society Towards a Sociology of Embedded Praxis. Africa 73:4  pp. 606 ff. DOI logo
Blommaert, Jan & Chris Bulcaen
2000. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:1  pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Blommaert, Jan
1998. Book Reviews. Discourse & Society 9:4  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Blommaert, Jan
2001. Context is/as Critique. Critique of Anthropology 21:1  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Blommaert, Jan
2005. Discourse, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.