Article published in:
Clinical interviews as verbal interactions
Edited by Michèle Grossen and Anne Salazar-Orvig
[Pragmatics 8:2] 1998
► pp. 167183

Full-text

Interpreting and diverging in clinical interviews
References
Aguttes, P. & A. Salazar Orvig
(1986) Analyse du discours et toxicomanie. In C. Ferbos & A. Magoudi (eds.), Approche psychanalytique des toxicomanes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 213-241.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M. & J. Heritage
(1984) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Apothéloz, D. & M. Grossen
(1996) Dynamique conversationnelle dans un entretien psychothérapeutique. Interaction et cognitions 1.1: 115-149.Google Scholar
Bakhtine, M.
. (Volochinov, V.N) (1977, 1st ed., 1920) Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Paris: Minuit, Le Sens Commun.Google Scholar
Bange, P.
(1983) Points de vue sur l’analyse conversationnelle. DRLAV 29: 1-28.Google Scholar
Conein, B.
(1987) Quelques formes de l’interprétation de la conversation dans la conversation. Lexique 5: 37-64.Google Scholar
De Gaulmyn, M.M.
(1987a) Reformulation et planification métadiscursives. In J. Cosnier & C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.), Décrire la conversation. Lyon: Presses Unversitaires de Lyon, pp. 167-198.Google Scholar
(1987b) Actes de reformulation et processus de reformulation. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 83-98.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O.
(1980) Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation, In O. Ducrot et al.. (1980) Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit, pp. 7-56.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Eco, U.
(1992) Les limites de l’interprétation. Paris: Biblio essais, Le livre de poche.Google Scholar
François, F.
(1995) Organising principles, discourse mouvements and atmosphere in dialogue: A clinical interview between a psychiatrist and a patient. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11. 2 (31): 205-225.Google Scholar
(1990) (ed.) La communication inégale. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
(1993) Pratiques de l’oral, Dialogue, jeu et variations des figures du sens. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
(unpublished manuscript) Interpréter l’interprétation: Quelques fils.
Freud, S.
(1925, consulted ed. 1975) La dénégation. Paris: Coq Héron.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. New york: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Grossen, M.
(1996) Counselling and gatekeeping: Definitions of the problem and situation in a first therapeutic interview. Text 16.2: 161-198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grunig, B.N. & R. Grunig
(1985) La fuite du sens. Paris: Hatier.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grunig, B.N.
(1994) Pour une conception dynamique du contexte. La linguistique 31.2: 5-13.Google Scholar
Gülich, E. & T. Kotschi
(1987) Les actes de reformulation dans la consultation “La dame de Caluire”. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 15-81.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.Google Scholar
(1995) Mutual inferencing in conversation. In I. Marková, C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa (eds.), Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101-123.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
(1989) Le principe d’interprétation dialogique. Cahiers de Praxématique 132: 43-59.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & D. Fanshel
(1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marková I. & K. Foppa
(1990) The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Asymmetries in dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marková I., C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa K
(eds.) (1995) Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moeschler, J.
(1989) La problématique des rPgles d’enchaînement et d’interprétation revisitée. In C. Rubattel (ed.), ModPles du discours. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 61-84.Google Scholar
(1996) Théorie pragmatique et pragmatique conversationnelle. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R.
(1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 83-104.Google Scholar
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin, J. Moeschler, C. Rubattel & M. Schelling
(1985) L’articulation du français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A.
(1986) Analyse des stratégies langagiPres de patients psychotiques dans le dialogue et le monologue, Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris V.Google Scholar
(1995) Misunderstandings and the construction of dialogue in a clinical interview. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11.2[31]: 227-247.Google Scholar
(in press) Espace discursif et interprétations dans le dialogue. Remarques B partir de l’analyse d’entretiens cliniques, In S. Cmejrkova et al.. Dialoganalyse VI. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
(1997) Interprétations et temporalité de l’espace discursif. Paper presented at The XVIth International Conference of Linguistics. Paris, July 1997.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. & C. Hudelot
(1989) Enchaînements, continuités et déplacements dialogiques chez le jeune enfant. Verbum 12.1: 99-115.Google Scholar
Trognon A.
(1993) La négociation du sens dans l’interaction, In J.F. Halté (ed.), Inter-actions. Metz: Université de Metz, pp. 91-120.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Grossen, Michèle & Anne Salazar Orvig
2011. Third parties' voices in a therapeutic interview. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 31:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.