The activity type as interface between langue and parole, and between individual and society
An argument for trichotomy in pragmatics
Gu Yueguo | The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
This paper first re-examines Levinson’s notion of activity type, followed by a review of ethnographic, sociopsychological and ecological studies of the same phenomenon under varied names. The activity type is generally treated as a context in pragmatics. This paper departs from this thinking by proposing that it be treated as the primary object and unit of investigation per se. The role the activity type plays should be that of an interface bridging the langue-parole dichotomy, and the individual-society dichotomy. It is further proposed that the activity type be studied as embodied activities at the token level. It is thus re-conceptualized in term of land-borne situated discourse (LBSD).
2016. Why We Need the Pragmeme, or: Speech Acting and Its Peripeties. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 133 ff.
Mey, Jacob L.
2016. Practs and Facts. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 239 ff.
2014. Levinson's Activity Types and Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.