Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:1 (2021) ► pp.59–78

Critical sociocognitive analysis of hate speech in the 2015 Nigerian presidential election campaigns

| University of Ibadan
In an attempt to ensure electoral victory, politicians use different strategies. One of such is resort to hate speech to discredit the opponents. The 2015 presidential election campaigns in Nigeria witnessed unrestrained use of hate speech in different media. This paper analysed selected speeches of the campaign organisations of the two leading political parties in the election, namely the Peoples Democratic Party Presidential Campaign Organisation and the All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Organisation. Data were got from the speeches and advertorials of the two organisations sampled from The Nation and The Punch, published between January and March 2015. The speeches were subjected to critical sociocognitive analysis. The antecedents of the candidates became a recipe for hate speech. Propagandist and alarmist ideologies were used. Socially shared knowledge played an important role in the hate speech. Figures were used symbolically and serious attempts were made to frighten the electorate.
Keywords: hate speech, critical sociocognitive analysis, propagandist and alarmist ideologies, 2015 Nigerian presidential election, Peoples Democratic Party Presidential Campaign Organisation (PDP), All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Organisation (APC)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hate speech
  • 3.Theoretical framework
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Strategies employed in the hate speeches
    • 5.1X-raying the leadership activities
    • 5.2Focusing on perceived incapability of the other candidate
    • 5.3Assessment of democratic qualities
    • 5.4Attacking each other’s psychological orientation
    • 5.5Harping on corruption-related Matters
    • 5.6Challenging religious extremism
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16030.sun
References (40)
References
Primary sources
The Nation, Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2015:231Google Scholar
The Nation, Wednesday, January 27, 2015:61Google Scholar
The Nation, Friday February 13, 2015:181Google Scholar
The Punch, Tuesday, January 13, 2015:121Google Scholar
The Punch, Wed., January 14, 2015:181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Punch, Friday, Jan. 16, 2015:241Google Scholar
The Punch, Monday, January, 19, 2015:261Google Scholar
The Punch, Tuesday January 20, 2015: 211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Punch, Friday, Jan. 23, 2015:31Google Scholar
The Punch, Sunday, February 1, 2015:201Google Scholar
The Punch, Wednesday, February, 4, 2015:11Google Scholar
The Punch, Sunday, February 5, 2015:231Google Scholar
The Punch, Friday February 6, 2015:21Google Scholar
The Punch, Sunday, February 8, 2015:221Google Scholar
The Punch, Monday, Feb. 9, 2015:231Google Scholar
The Punch, Wed., February 11, 2015:221Google Scholar
The Punch, Tuesday, February 17, 2015:201Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Abdullahi-Idiagbon, Mohammed S. 2010. Language Use in Selected Nigerian Presidential Election Campaign Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Journal of the Nigeria English Studies Association 13, 2: 32–49.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2012. Written Contribution to the Thematic Discussion on Racist Hate Speech and Freedom of Opinion and Expression Organized by the United Nations Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination.Google Scholar
ARTICLE 19. 2015. Hate Speech Explained: A Toolkit. London: ARTICLE 19.Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik. 2011. The rise of Hate Speech and Hate Crime Laws 934 in Liberal Democracies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37, 6: 917–934. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Jessie. 2008. Race, Civil Rights, and Hate Speech in the Digital Era. Learning Race and Ethnicity. Youth and Digital Media. Anna Everett (Ed.) The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. 129–154.Google Scholar
Edstrӧm, Maria. 2016. The Trolls Disappear in the Light: Swedish Experiences of Mediated Sexualised Hate Speech in the Aftermath of Behring Breivik. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 5(2): 96–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasiku, Aderonke M. 2011. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Campaign Speeches of Dr Goodluck Jonathan. M.A. Project. Dept. of English, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Catherine B. 1999. Stopping Hate without Stifling Speech: Re-examining the Merits of Hate Speech Codes on University Campuses. Fordham Urban Law Journal 27, 6: 1819–1868. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37, 6: 917–934.Google Scholar
Leets, Laura. 2002. Experiencing Hate Speech: Perceptions and Responses to Anti-Semitism and Antigay Speech. Journal of Social Issues 58, 2: 341–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leets, Laura, and Howard Giles. 1999. Harmful Speech in Intergroup Encounters: An Organizational Framework for Communication Research. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 221: 91–137. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 2014. The Content and Context of Hate speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. International Constitutional Law 12,3: 816–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oderinde, Johnson A. 2014. A Rhetorical Analysis of the 2012 Election Debate Speeches Of Gubernatorial Candidates in Ondo State. M.A. Project. Dept. of English, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Oyedele, Akinkunmi A. 2011. The Rhetoric of Difference and Confrontation in Political Songs: The Case of Action Congress of Nigeria and Peoples Democratic Party in Osun State. M.A. Project. Dept. of English, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Sedler, Robert A. 1992. The Unconstitutionality of Campus Bans on “Racist Speech”: The View from Without and Within. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 521: 631–683.Google Scholar
Smolla, Rodney A. 1990. Academic Freedom, Hate Speech, and the idea of a University. Law and Contemporary Problems 53, 3: 195–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey R. 1994. Hate Speech and the U.S. Constitution. 3 East European Constitutional Review 781: 78–82.Google Scholar
Sunday, Adesina B. 2011. Verbal Assault in Fu´jì Music: The Case of Sikiru Ayinde Barrister Kollington Ayinla. Journal of Pragmatics 43,5: 1403–1421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 2006. Ideology and Discourse Analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11,2: 115–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Discourse, Knowledge, Power and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis. In Christopher Hart (Ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 28–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A Note on Epistemics and Discourse Analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 511: 478–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Discourse-Cognition-Society: Current State and Prospects of the Socio-cognitive Approach to Discourse. Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap (Eds.), Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury. 121–146.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Context. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. London: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 63–85.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sunday, Adesina B.
2022. Social Cognition and Advertisement in Yusuf Olatunji’s Music. In Indigenous African Popular Music, Volume 1 [Pop Music, Culture and Identity, ], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.