Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 10:2 (2019) ► pp. 287315

[ p. 314 ]References

Araszkiewicz, Michał, and Marcin Koszowy
2016 “Deontic Authority in Legal Argumentation: A Case Study.” In Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015, ed. by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński, vol. 1, 1–19. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Azuelos-Atias, Sol
2016 “Identifying the Meanings Hidden in Legal Texts: The three conditions of relevance theory and their sufficiency.” Semiotica 209 (March): 99–123.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bocheński, Józef M.
1974 “An Analysis of Authority.” In Authority, ed. by F. J. Adelman, 58–65. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budzynska, Katarzyna
2010Argument Analysis: Components of Interpersonal Argumentation. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), ed. by Pietro Baroni et al., 135–146. Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo & Washington, D.C.: IOS Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Circularity in Ethotic Structures.” Synthese 190(15): 3185–3207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 633–656. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M. and Carl Cohen
2005Introduction to Logic, 12th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T.
1985The Nature and Limits of Authority. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community.” Official Journal of the European Union, 191 (1). http://​eur​-lex​.europa​.eu​/legal​-content​/EN​/TXT​/PDF​/?uri​=CELEX​:32008L0057​&from​=EN. Last accessed: 30 March 2018.
Duschl, Richard
2008 “Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals.” Review of Research in Education 32: 268–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jean
1998 “Forms of Authority and the Real ‘Ad Verecundiam’.” Argumentation 12: 267–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grennan, Wayne
1997Informal Logic: Issues and Techniques. Kingston, Ont.: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1970Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. C.
1963A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Hurley, Patrick J.
2003A Concise Introduction to Logic. 8th ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H. and J. Anthony Blair
1983Logical Self-Defence. 2nd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
[ p. 315 ]
Kienpointner, Manfred
1992Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Kim, Mijung, Robert Anthony & D. Blades
2012Argumentation as a Tool to Understand Complexity of Knowledge Integration. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International STEM in Education Conference – Beijing, China – 24–27 November 2012 (pp. 154–160). Beijing: Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar
Kline, Susan L. & Barbara Warnick
1992The New Rhetoric’s Argument Schemes. Argumentation and Advocacy 29 (1): 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koszowy, Marcin
2013 “Polish Logical Studies from an Informal Logic Perspective.” In Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22–26 May 2013, ed. by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewiński, 1–10. Windsor, Ont.: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.Google Scholar
Koszowy, Marcin and Michał Araszkiewicz
2014The Lvov-Warsaw School as a source of inspiration for argumentation theory. Argumentation 28(3): 283–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koszowy, Marcin and Katarzyna Budzynska
2016 “Towards a Model for Ethotic Structures in Dialogical Context.” In Foundations of the Language of Argumentation – The Workshop at the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016), ed. by Manfred Stede and Patrick Saint-Dizier, 40–47. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Lawrence, John and Chris Reed
2015 “Combining Argument Mining Techniques”. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Argumentation Mining, Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lechniak, Marek
2013 “Bocheński’s Method of Philosophical Analysis and Contemporary Applied Ontology.” Studies in East European Thought, 65, 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John
1836An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 27th edition with the author’s last additions and corrections. London: Balne [1817]Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2006 “The Role of Explicature in Communication and in Intercultural Communication.” In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Laurence Horn, 73–94, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, E. Michael
2011 “Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education.” Educational Psychologist 46: 84–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Simon, Katie Atkinson, Zimi Li, Peter McBurney, Elizabeth Sklar, Munindar Singh, Karen Haigh, Karl Levitt, and Jeff Rowe
2014 “Argument Schemes for Reasoning About Trust.” Argument & Computation 5 (2–3): 160–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Petrus Hispanus
1972Tractatus (Summulae logicales), V, § 36: “De loco ab auctoritate”, ed. by Lambertus Marie de Rijk. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Rapanta, Chrysi, Merce Garcia-Mila, and Sandra Gilabert
2013 “What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education.” Review of Educational Research 83: 483–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 316 ]
Scholz, Oliver R.
2009 “Experts: What they Are and How we Recognize them – A Discussion of Alvin Goldman’s Views.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1): 187–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
2005 “What is an Institution?Journal of Institutional Economics 1: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagemans J.
2011 “The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion”. Argumentation 25: 329–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas
1996Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1997Appeal to Expert Opinion. University Park, Penna: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method.” International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence 6(3): 33–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas and Chris Reed
2002 “Argumentation schemes and defeasible inferences”. In Working Notes of the ECAI’2002 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, ed. by Giuseppe Carenini, Floriana Grasso, and Chris Reed, 45–55. Lyon.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed and Fabrizio Macagno
2008Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Giovanni Sartor and Fabrizio Macagno
2016Contested Cases of Statutory Interpretation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 24(1): 51–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max
1958The Three Types of Legitimate Rule. Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions 4 (1): 1–11. Translated by Hans Gerth.Google Scholar
Webster’s New World Law Dictionary
2006 Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard
1870Elements of logic. Reprinted from the 9th Octavo edition of 1826. London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer.Google Scholar
Wilson, Patrick
1983Secondhand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2013 “How to Establish Authority with Words: Imperative Utterances and Presupposition Accommodation.” In Theory of Imperatives from Different Points of View (2), ed. by Anna Brożek, Jacek Jadacki and Berislav Žarnić, 145–157. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University, Vol. 7. Warsaw: Semper.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda
2012Epistemic Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 317 ]
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Budzynska, Katarzyna, Marcin Koszowy & Martín Pereira-Fariña
2021. Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World. Argumentation 35:4  pp. 519 ff. Crossref logo
Koszowy, Marcin, Katarzyna Budzynska, Martín Pereira-Fariña & Rory Duthie
2022. From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements. Argumentation Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.