Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:3 (2020) ► pp.415–439

The thought processes of criminals

A semantic perspective

| Bar-Ilan University

This study examines what may be learned from a semantic analysis of the discourse of criminal groups about elements of the cognitive map of the group’s members. The primary group examined comprised sex offenders who victimized children. The findings were compared with another criminal group – murderers. To examine their shared linguistic characteristics, a study was made of passages from 40 transcribed subject interviews, in which they tell their life stories. The function words from the passages were classified according to semantic fields, in order to identify what psychological and sociological insights can be gained from their use, a similar study was made of normative men’s stories. The semantic fields unique to the sex offenders are presented in this paper, and are compared with the fields used by the other two groups, together with a discussion of the significance of the words included therein.

Keywords: thought processes, sex offenders, murderers, cognitive map, psycholect, semantic analysis, semantic fields
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Semantic analysis for the purpose of personality characterization
    • 2.2Sexual victimizers of children
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instruments
    • 3.3Procedure
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Semantic characteristics of sex offenders
    • 5.2Semantic characteristics of murderers
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 31 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17014.dil
References
Ahlmeyer, Sean, Dennis Kleinsasser, John Stoner, and Paul Retzlaff
2003 Psychopathology of incarcerated sex offenders. Journal of Personality Disorders 171: 306–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassey, Edem A.
2000 Terminology and language planning: An alternative framework of practice and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ben-David, Sarah, and Mali Shechory
2008 Hateguva hachevratit la’avaryanei min: Anisha, pikuach, tipul veshikum moneiya [Social response to sex offenders: Punishment, supervision, treatment and preventive rehabilitation]. In Hapikuach al avaryanei min beyisrael: Anisha o tipul? [Supervision of sex offenders in Israel: Punishment or treatment?], ed. by Efrat Shoham, 183–197. Tel Aviv: Perlstein-Ginossar.Google Scholar
Bosson, Jennifer K, William B. Swann, and James W. Pennebaker
2000 Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (4): 631–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Ryan L. and James W. Pennebaker
2015 Did Shakespeare write Double Falsehood? Identifying individuals by creating psychological signatures with text analysis. Psychological Science 26 (5): 570–582.‏. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2000 The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bumby, Kurt M., and David J. Hansen
1997 Intimacy deficits, fear of intimacy, and loneliness among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior 24 (3): 315–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter, and Peter K. Smith
1996 Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David
2010 Ha’arakhat sikun kechelek mitahalich hatipul ba’avaryanei min bogrim [Risk evaluation as part of the treatment process for adult sex offenders]. In Tipul be’avaryanei min beyisrael: Etgarim bezihui, be’ifyun uvema’aneh tipuli [The treatment of sex offenders in Israel: Challenges in identification, characterization, and treatment], ed. by Mali Shechory, Sarah Ben-David, and Meir Hovav, 29–44. Jerusalem: Carmel.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ben
2011 Codes and conventions: The terms and conditions of contemporary inmate values. In The effects of imprisonment, ed. by Alison Liebling and Shadd Maruna, 177–194. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curnoe, Suzanne, and Ron Langevin
2002 Personality and deviant sexual fantasies: An examination of the MMPIs of sex offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58 (7): 803–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel
1981 Idiolect, dialect, sociolect: What about ‘psycholect’? In James E. Copeland and Philip W. Davis (eds.), LACUS Forum 71, 319–325. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
de Smit, Merlijn
2010 Modelling mixed languages: Some remarks on the case of old Helsinki slang. Journal of Language Contact 31: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deák, Gedeon O.
2004 The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 311: 271–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dilmon, Rakefet
2004 Ifyunim leshoni’im shel sfat sheker behashva’ah lisfat emet [Linguistic differences between lie and truth in spoken Hebrew]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Dilmon, Rakefet, and Uri Timor
2013 The narrative of men who murder their partners: How reliable is it? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57 (9):1125-1149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egan, Vincent, James Hoskinson, and David Shewan
2011 Perverted justice: A content analysis of the language used by offenders detected attempting to solicit children for sex. In Antisocial behavior: Causes, correlations and treatments, ed. by Rebecca M. Clarke, 119–134. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Elisha, Esther
2010 Chalon hizdamnuyot? Bechinat gormim chiyuvi’im bekerev asirim avaryanei min vehashpa’atam al tefisat hama’asar kehizdamnut leshinui vetikun derekh chayim [Window of opportunity? An examination of positive factors among sex crime convicts and their influence on the idea of incarceration as an opportunity for change and reform]. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay L., Candida C. Peterson, and Tricia Perry
2001 Social cognition, language acquisition, and the development of theory of mind. Mind and Language 161: 494–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth, and Mary Gergen
1987 Narrative of relationships. In Accounting for relationships, ed. by Patrick McGhee, David Clarke, and Rosalie Burnett, 269–288. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gliozzo, Alfio
2006 Semantic domains and linguistic theory. In Proceedings of the LREC 2006 workshop “Toward computational models of literary analysis,” Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
Grubin, Don
1998 Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, [URL] (Accessed 7 May, 2011).
Harris, Grant T., Marnie E. Rice, N. Zoe Hilton, Martin L. Lalumiere and Vernon L. Quinsey
2007 Coercive and precocious sexuality as a fundamental aspect of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders 211: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
How, Michael
1999 A teacher’s guide to the psychology of learning. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Israel Prisons Service
2011 Prisoner treatment: Data on types of prisoners, [URL] (11 May 2011.)
Johnson, Scott A.
2007 Physical abusers and sexual offenders: Forensic and clinical strategies. Boca Raton, La.: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Kalichman, Seth C.
1991 Psychopathology and personality characteristics of criminal sexual offenders as a function of victim age. Archives of Sexual Behavior 201: 187–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, Marcin
2010 Sociolects and registers: A contrastive analysis of two kinds of linguistic variation. Investigationes Linguisticae 201: 60–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lotman, Yuri M.
1981 Al shira “geruah” veshira “tova” [On “bad” poetry and “good” poetry]. Trans. H. Golomb. Siman Kriah 12–13: 145–147.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, William L., and Geris A. Serran
2000 Current issues in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 71: 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, William L., Emily Cripps, D. Anderson, and Franca A. Cortoni
1999 Self-esteem and coping strategies in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 141: 955–963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muchnik, Malka
2002 Lashon, chevra vetarbut [Language, society and culture]. Vol. 11. Tel Aviv: Open University.Google Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan
1983 [1936] Funktzia, norma ve’erekh esteti’im [Function, norm, and esthetic value]. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hame’uchad, Sifriat Hapoalim.Google Scholar
Müller, Christian
2007 Speaker classification: Fundamentals, features, and methods. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate G. Niederhoffer
2003 Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54 (1): 547–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigue-Schwarzwald, Ora, and Michael Sokoloff
1992 Milon lemunachei balshanut vedikduk [A Hebrew dictionary of terms in linguistics and philology]. Even-Yehuda: Reches.Google Scholar
Samsonovich, Alexei V., and Giorgio A. Ascoli
2007 Cognitive map dimensions of the human value system extracted from natural language. In Advances in artificial general intelligence: Concepts, architectures and algorithms, ed. by Ben Goertzel and Pei Wang. (Proceedings of the AGI Workshop 2006, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 157), 111–124. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gunter
2002 The dilemma of the male pedophile. Archives of Sexual Behavior 31 (6): 473–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seker, Zohar
1989 Yesodot stati’im betekst hashiri: Ekronot poeti’im ve’idiologi’im meyuchadim hamanchim biyesud model mishni shel mashma’uyot milim beshirat Yehuda Amichai uvnei doro [Static elements in the poetic text: Special poetic and ideological guiding principles in establishing a secondary semantic model in the poetry of Yehuda Amichai and his contemporaries]. Tel Aviv University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Shechory, Mali
2008 Me’afyanim mavchinim bein anasim uvein mitalelim minit beyeladim [Differentiating characteristics between rapists and sexual abusers of children]. In Hapikuach al avaryanei min beyisrael: Anisha o tipul? [Supervision of sex offenders in Israel: Punishment versus treatment], ed. by Efrat Shoham, 91–112. Tel Aviv: Perlstein-Ginossar.Google Scholar
Shechory, Mali, and Sarah Ben-David
2005 Aggression and anxiety in rapists and child molesters. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 49 (6): 652–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shechory, Mali, Sarah Ben-David, and Yael Idisis
2008 Avaryanei min ve’aveirot min ba’aretz uva’olam: Chakika, pikuach, tipul veshikum [Sex offenders and sex offenses in Israel and the world: Legislation, supervision, treatment and rehabilitation]. In Hitmakruyot, alimut ve’aveirot min: Tipul le’or hachok [Addictions, violence and sex crimes: Treatment in the light of the law], ed. by Haim Mell, Meir Hovav and Miriam Golan, 421–443. Jerusalem: Carmel.Google Scholar
Shenhar, Aliza, and Shlomo Sherlin
1987 Shimru nafsham! Al mitbagrim mit’abdim veshiratam [Take care of them! On suicidal adolescents and their poetry]. Haifa: Haifa University.Google Scholar
Simkins, Lawrence
1993 Characteristics of sexually repressed child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 81: 3–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sovran, Tamar
1994a Mashma’ut, hora’ah vesadot semanti’im shel musagim mufshatim [Meaning, reference, and the semantic fields of abstract notions]. Balshanut Ivrit [Hebrew Linguistics] 371: 41–54.Google Scholar
1994b Sadot semanti’im: Iyun balshani-philosofi bekishrei mashma’ut [Semantic fields: A lingo-philosophical study of meaning relations]. Jerusalem: Magnes.Google Scholar
Toch, Hans
1998 Hypermasculinity and prison violence. In Masculinities and violence, ed. by Lee H. Bowker, 168–178. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003 The key is social cognition. In Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, ed. by Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow, 47–57. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trier, Jost
1931 Das sprachliche Feld: Eine Auseinandersetzung [The linguistic field: A discussion]. In Jost Trier: Aufsätze und Vorträge zur Wortfeldtheorie [Jost Trier: Essays and lectures in word field theory], ed. by Anthony van der Lee and Oskar Reichmann, 150–151. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vygotskiĭ, Lev S.
2012 [1929] Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Tony, and Anthony R. Beech
2006 An integrated theory of sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior 111: 44–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Tony, Stephen M. Hudson, William L. Marshall, and Richard Siegert
1995 Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment 71: 317–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2008 Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview (Vol. 31). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1965 Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yassour, Yossi
1995 Hahachlata lirtzoach [The decision to murder]. Tel Aviv: Ramot.Google Scholar