Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:4 (2020) ► pp.615–639

Analyzing interdiscursivity in legal genres

The case of Chinese lawyers’ written opinions

| Beihang University
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| Jinan University

The traditional simplistic understanding of legal genre as homogeneous texts of legalese is recently confronted by researches focusing on the contextual aspects of legal communication, i.e. the production, circulation, and consumption of legal genres in diverse institutional contexts (Candlin and Maley 1997; D’hondt and Van Der Houwen 2014). It is, according to these researches, more reasonable to think of legal genres as a hybrid combining the operation of different heterogeneous discourses. This article takes the broad contextual perspective, draws on the theory of critical genre analysis (Bhatia 2016) and attempts to explore the discursive heterogeneity in one of the Chinese legal genres – the lawyers’ defense opinions. Both textual and interpretative analysis are conducted in order to identify specific discourses that underline Chinese lawyers’ preparation of defense opinions, and to look at how Chinese lawyers linguistically construct the different discourses to fulfill the ultimate purpose of justifying the defendant’s actions.

Keywords: critical genre analysis, interdiscursivity, discursive innovations, legal writing, lawyering practices, Chinese legal context
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interdiscursivity in professional discourse studies
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Critical genre analysis
    • 3.2Lawyers’ opinions as a structured legal genre
    • 3.3Lawyers’ opinions as a dynamic interdiscursive institution
  • 4.Legal discourse
  • 5.Moral discourse
  • 6.Therapeutic discourse
  • 7.Self-legitimation discourse
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17030.han
References
Bagguley, Paul
1991 “Post-Fordism and enterprise culture: Flexibility, autonomy and changes in economic organization.” In Enterprise Culture, ed. by Russell Keat and Nicholas Abercrombie. 151–170. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981 The Dialogic Imagination (trans. by M. Holquist, and C. Emerson; ed. by M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans. by V. McGee; ed. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Catherine Nickerson
(eds.) 2014 Writing Business: Genres, Media and Discourses. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A.
2008 Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
2004 “Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts.” in What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior. 83–96. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles, and Paul Prior
(eds.) 2004 What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2004 Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 “Towards critical genre analysis.” in Advances in Discourse Studies, ed. by Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew, and Rodney Jones. 166–177. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Critical genre analysis: Theoretical preliminaries”. Hermes 541: 9–20.Google Scholar
2017 Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2013 “Lexical bundles across four legal genres”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremner, Stephen
2014 “Genres and processes in the PR industry: Behind the scenes with an intern writer”. International Journal of Business Communication 51(3): 259–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., and Ken Hyland
(eds.) 1999 Writing: Texts, Processes, and Practices. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., and Yon Maley
1997 “Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution.” in The Construction of Professional Discourse, ed. by L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, and B. Nordberg. 201–222. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cheng, Le
2010 “A semiotic interpretation of genre: court judgments as an example”. Semiotica 1821: 89–113.Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, and K. K. Sin
2008 “A court judgment as dialogue.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand. 267–281. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr
1990 Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Sarah R.
2009 “Doing dialogue: Genre and flexibility in public engagement with science.” Science as Culture 18(4): 397–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy J.
1991 “Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential and functional.” in Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, ed. by Charles Bazerman and James Paradis. 336–355. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
D’hondt, Sigurd, and Fleur van der Houwen
2014 “Quoting from the case file: How intertextual practices shape discourse at various stages in the legal trajectory”. Language & Communication 36(2): 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elkins, James R.
1982 “Moral discourse and legalism in legal education”. Journal of Legal Education 32(1): 11–52.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Technologisation of discourse.” in Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard. 71–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha
1988 “Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decision making.” Harvard Law Review 1011: 272–774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishelov, David
1993 Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Frow, John
2006 Genre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giltrow, Janet, and Dieter Stein
(eds.) 2008 Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hafner, Christoph A.
2010 “A multi-perspective genre analysis of the Barrister’s Opinion: Writing context, generic structure, and textualization.” Written Communication 27(4): 410–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The discursive construction of professional expertise: Appeals to authority in barrister’s opinions.” English for Specific Purposes 32(3): 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Han, Zhengrui
2011 “The discursive construction of civil judgments in Mainland China.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 743–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities.” Discourse & Communication 8(1): 85–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “The mediatization of Chinese corporate communication: A linguistic approach.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 127–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Zhengrui, and Xiaoyu Li
2011.” Discourse of international commercial arbitration: The case of Mainland China.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(5): 1380–1391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hantler, Steven B., Victor E. Schwartz, and Phil S. Goldberg
2004 “Extending the privilege to litigation communications specialist sin the age of trial by media.” CommLaw Conspectus 131: 7–34.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2008 “Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5(2): 91–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspective. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel, and Gregory Hadley
2004 “Demystifying institutional practices: Critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing.” English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 355–377.Google Scholar
He, Xin, and Kwai Huang Ng
2013 “In the name of harmony: The erasure of domestic violence in China’s judicial mediation.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 27(1): 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Pamela
2008 “ ‘It’s not what you say but how you say it’: The role of personality and identity in trial success.” Critical Discourse Studies 5(3): 231–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T.
1979 “Formality and informality in communicative events.” American Anthropologist 81(4): 773–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
2009 “Commentary on Paul Van Den Hoven’s ‘Argument Discourse as a Sign’.” In Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09 (CD-ROM), ed. by J. Ritola. 1–3. Windsor, Ont.: OSSA.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2015 “Generic intertextuality in online social activism: The case of the It Gets Better Project.” Language in Society 44(3): 317–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jae Won
2001 “The ideal and the reality of the Korean legal profession.” Asian-Pacific law & Policy Journal 2(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Kolln, Martha
2003 Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects (4th ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia
1986 “Word, dialogue, and novel.” In The Kristeva Reader, ed. by T. Moi. 36–61. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
2009 “Speech acts in Early Modern English court trials.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(3): 440–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis
1986 It is Hereby Performed…: Explorations in Legal Speech acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Janny H. C.
2012 “Judicial discourse in Cantonese courtrooms in postcolonial Hong Kong: the judge as a godfather, scholar, educator and scolding parent.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19(2): 239–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerman, Lisa G.
2005 “Greed among American lawyers.” Oklahoma City University Law Review 301: 611–636.Google Scholar
Li, Yunlong
2012 Collection of Chinese Lawyers’ Defense Opinions – Li Yunlong (中国大律师辩护词代理词精选: 李云龙专辑). Beijing: China Law Pres.Google Scholar
Lin, Duan
2002 Confucianism and Chinese Legal Cultures (儒家伦理与法律文化). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil
2005 Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jim R., and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle
1990 Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.
1999 The problematics of moral and legal theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E.
2007 Analysing Newspaper: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rotunda, Ronald D.
1999 “The legal profession and the public image of lawyers.” The Journal of Legal Profession 231: 51–64.Google Scholar
Russell, David R., and David Fisher
2009 “Online, multimedia cases studies for professional education.” In Genres in the Internet, ed. by J. Giltrow and D. Stein. 163–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant
2000 “Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counseling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard. 1–27. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher N. Candlin
2010 Applied linguistics and professional practice: mapping a future agenda. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7(1): 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts
1999 “Discursive hybridity in medical work.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by S. Sarangi and C. Roberts. 61–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Stefan Slembrouck
1996 Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Thomas L.
1979 “Advocacy as moral discourse.” North Carolina Law Review 571: 647–670.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spenader, Jennifer, and Emar Maier
2009 “Contrast as denial in multi-dimensional semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(9): 1707–1726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
1990 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Worlds of genre – Metaphors of genre.” In Genre in a Changing World, ed. by C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, and D. Figueirede. 3–16. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tessuto, Girolamo
2006 “Opinions of counsel: An exploratory survey.” In Explorations in Specialized Genres, ed. by Vijay Bhatia and Maurizio Gotti. 297–309. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Tian, Wenchang
2013 Collection of Chinese Lawyers’ Defense Opinions – Tian Wenchang (中国大律师辩护词代理词精选: 田文昌专辑). Beijing: China Law Pres.Google Scholar
Tickoo, Asha
2010 “On assertion without free speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(6): 1577–1594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M.
1999 Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
1995 “Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law.” Journal of Pragmatics 23(1): 31–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Hoven, Paul
2011 “The unchangeable judicial formats.” Argumentation 451: 499–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 4(2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Jiuchuan
2016 Collection of Chinese Lawyers’ Defense Opinions – Wang Jiuchuan (中国大律师辩护词代理词精选: 王九川专辑). Beijing: China Law Pres.Google Scholar
Xiong, Yaoming
2007 “The origins and development of adversary trials (辩论主义: 溯源与变迁)”. Modern Law Journal (现代法学) 2007 (February): 91–98.Google Scholar
Zhu, Hongqiang, Wei Ren, and Zhengrui Han
2016 “The impact of marketization on the communication of Chinese academicians: A genre analytical perspective.” Critical Discourse Studies 13(5): 467–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar