Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:3 (2021) ► pp.373389
References
Alm, Maria
2007Also darüber lässt sich ja streiten! Die Analyse von also in der Diskussion zu Diskurs-und Modalpartikeln. (‘So you can argue about this! The analysis of also in the discussion of discourse and modal particles’.) Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles
2008 “Formulations in psychotherapy”. In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Applied Conversation Analysis: Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar
2005 “Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
2006 “Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 2(2):193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Mark A.
1984 “Similarity of experience and empathy in prescholars.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 145 (2): 241–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano, and Maurizio Viaro
2008 “Client’s responses to therapists’ reinterpretations” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buttny, Richard
1993Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
1996 “Clients’ and Therapist’s Joint Construction of Clients’ Problems.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (2):125–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Manuel Padilla
2008 “Phatic utterances as face-threatening/saving acts or politeness strategies: A pragmatic reflection for their teaching in the L2 class.” In 25 Years of Applied Linguistics in Spain: Milestones and Challenges, ed. by Rafael Monroy Casas and Aquilino Sánchez Perez, 799–804. Murcia: Edit.um.Google Scholar
Davidson, Judy
1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eslami, Zohreh R., and Shuan Wei-Hong Ko
2015 “Facework in Non-face Threatening Emails by Native and Non-native English Speakers.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 4 (1):111–126.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Leslie S., Laura North Rice, and Robert K. Elliott
1993Facilitating Emotional Change: The Moment by Moment Process. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2007 “The Co-constitution of Politeness Implicature in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
2003 “Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to Requests in Institutional Settings.” Text & Talk 23 (1):27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter
2007 “Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and Institutional Practice.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 89–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994 “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1):1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and D. Rod Watson
1980 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Martin L.
2000Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Lerner, Gene H., 13–31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalisch, Beatrice J.
1973 “What is Empathy?American Journal of Nursing 73 (9):1548–1552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
2009 “Politeness.” In The Pragmatics of Interaction, ed. by Sigurd D’hond, Jan-Ola Ӧstman, and Jef Verschueren, 157–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makoul, Gregory
1998 “Communication Research in Medical Education.” In Health Communication Research: A Guide to Developments and Directions, ed. by Lorraine D. Jackson and Bernard K. Duffy. 17–35. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Stroe
1997Empatie si personalitate. Bucuresti: Editura Atos.Google Scholar
Miller, Gerald R., and Mark Steinberg
1975Between People: A New Analysis of Interpersonal Communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Paivio, Sandra C. and Christine Laurent
2001 “Empathy and Emotion Regulation: Reprocessing Memories of Childhood Abuse.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 57(2): 213–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi
2005 “Patients’ Responses to Interpretations: A Dialogue Between Conversation Analysis and Psychoanalytic Theory.” Communication & Medicine 2 (2):163–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “After Interpretation: Third-Position Utterances in Psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (3):288–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar
2008Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and David Silverman
1991 “Reinterpreting Speech-exchange Systems: Communication Forms in Aids Counselling.” Sociology 25 (4):627–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Richard M., and Thomas H. Zar1e
1972 “Differential Referral to a Significant Other as a Function of Interpersonal Effectiveness.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 28 (3): 230–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Carl R.
1957 “The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Therapeutic Personality Change.” Journal of Consulting Psychology 21 (2):95–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2005 “ ‘Empathy’ and ‘Sympathy’ in Action: Attending to Patients’ Troubles in Finnish Homeopathic and General Practice Consultations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (3):204–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Managing Affect: Integration of Empathy and Problem-solving in Health Care Encounters.” Discourse Studies 9 (5):597–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50 (1): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salwa, Salwa
2012 “The Use of Indirect Speech as a Face-saving Act in Anglo-Saxon Cultural Values.” Language, Discourse and Society 2 (1): 43–51.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70 (6):1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2012 “Negative Politeness Forms and Impoliteness Functions in Institutional Discourse: A Corpus-assisted Approach.” In Situated Politeness, ed. by Bethan Davies, Michael Haugh and Andrew John Merrison, 209–231. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa
2010 “Emotional Experience in Psychotherapeutic Interaction-Conversation Analytical Study on Cognitive Psychotherapy.” University of Helsinki Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
2012 “Responding to Emotion in Cognitive Psychotherapy.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 235–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Jeanee C.
2002 “Re-visioning empathy.” In Humanistic Pyschotherapies: Handbook of Research and Practice, ed. by David J. Cain and Jules Seeman, 445–471. London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Jeanee C. and Shari M. Geller
2005 “The Relation among the Relationship Conditions, Working Alliance, and Outcome in both Process-experiential and Cognitive-behavioral Psychotherapy.” Psychotherapy Research 15 (12):25–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Jeanee C., Rhonda Goldman, and Greet Vanaerschot
1998 “Empathic: A Post Modern Way of Being.” In The Handbook of Experiential Psychotherapy, ed. by Leslie S. Greenberg, Jeanee C. Watson and Germain Lietaer, 61–81. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Weiste, Elina
2018 “Relational interaction in occupational therapy: Conversation Analysis of Positive Feedback.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 25 (1):44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilce, James M.
2009Language and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger
2006 “Surprise as Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (2):150–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zajdman, Anat
1995 “Humorous Face-threatening Acts: Humor as Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 23(3):325–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Weihua
2014 “Rapport Management in Strong Disagreement: An Investigation of a Community of Chinese Speakers of English.” Text & Talk 34 (5): 641–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar