The practice of joint fantasizing concerns interacting participants’ collective construction of imaginary
realities with internal consistency and coherence. Based on a corpus of conversations held by an informal Italian prayer community
of elderly Catholic women, this contribution aims to show that joint fantasizing is not necessarily a humorous activity and is
embedded in the participants’ social and personal background. The analysis also indicates that through joint fantasizing the
participants conceptualize themselves as victims and idealized opponents of the unfair present and past societies. Framing joint
fantasizing as a cross-contextual activity of social criticism allows us to understand that the participants use this
interactional practice as an activity endowed with moral suffering and responsibility. This rhetorical seriousness contrasts with
other studies in which joint fantasies are generally connected with playful, jocular and laughable practices.
Béal, Christine and Kerry Mullan. 2013. “Issues
in conversational humour from a cross-cultural perspective: comparing French and Australian
corpora”. In: C. Béal, K. Mullan & B. Peeters (Eds.), Cross-culturally
Speaking, Speaking
Cross-culturally: 107–140. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Berk, Ronald A.2001. The active ingredients in humor:
Psychophysiological benefits and risks for older adults. Educational
Gerontology 27 (3–4): 323–339.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002/1977. Outline
of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Clark, Herbert H.1996. Using
Language. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge.
Clark, Herbert H. and Mija M. Van Der Wege. 2001. “Imagination
in discourse”. In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. H. (Eds.), The
Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 772–786. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Chovanec, Jan. 2012. “Conversational
humour and joint fantasising in online journalism”. Language and Humour in the
Media, ed. by J. Chovanec & I. Ermida, 139–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Coupland, Nikolas, Justine Coupland, and Howard Giles. 1991. Language,
society and the elderly: Discourse, identity and
ageing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dalby, Padmaprabha. 2006. Is
there a process of spiritual change or development associated with ageing? A critical review of
research. Aging & mental
health 1 (1): 4–12.
Damianakis, Thecla and Elsa Marziali. 2011. Community-dwelling
older adults’ contextual experiencing of humour. Ageing &
Society 3 (1): 110–124.
De Fina, Anna. 2008. Who
tells which story and why? Micro and macro contexts in narrative. Text &
Talk 28 (3): 421–442.
De Fina, Anna and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. Analysing
narratives as practices. Qualitative
Research 8 (3): 379–387.
Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (eds). 1992. Rethinking
context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Vol.
11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, Marta. 2018b. Irony,
Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert
Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dynel, Marta, and Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi. 2018. In
tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse and
Communication 12 (4): 382–400.
Dynel, Marta, and Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi. 2019. Risum
teneatis, amici?: The socio-pragmatics of RoastMe humour. Journal of
Pragmatics 1391: 1–21.
Frankl, Viktor. 1984. Man’s
Search for Meaning. New York: Washington Square Books.
Goodson, Ivor, Shawn Moore, and Shawn Hargreaves. 2006. Teacher
nostalgia and the sustainability of reform: The generation and degeneration of teachers’ missions, memory, and
meaning. Educational Administration
Quarterly 42 (1): 42–61.
Goodwin, Charles. 2006. “Retrospective
and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves”. Text &
Talk 261: 443–461.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness and Charles Goodwin. 1987. “Children’s
arguing”. In: S. U. Philips, S. Steele & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language,
Gender & Sex in Comparative
Perspective, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Frank. 1974. “Conversational
joking: a look at applied humour”. In: J. McDowell (Ed.), Folklore
Annual of the University Folklore
Association 6. 24–45. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Hay, Jennifer. 1995. Gender
and Humour: Beyond a Joke. Victoria University of Wellington. (Unpublished MA thesis).
Haugh, Michael. 2012. “Conversational
interaction”. In: K. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of
Pragmatics, 251–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, Michael. 2017. “Jocular
language play, social action and (dis)affiliation in conversational
interaction”. In: Bell, N. (Ed.), Multiple
Perspectives on Language
Play, 143–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel
and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra. 2002. Over
the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and
friend. Humor 151: 65–87.
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. On
the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social
Problems 351: 418–441.
Jefferson, Gail and John R. Lee. 1981. The
rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service
encounter’. Journal of
Pragmatics: 399–422.
Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo, and Alfredo Ardila. 2021. In Nomine Diaboli: The Ideologies of Organized Crime. European Journal of Criminology.
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice. 2006. How
funny it is when everyone gets going! A case of co-construction of humour in
conversation. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la
Comunicación 271.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A
simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for
conversation. Language 501: 696–735.
Stallone, Leticia and Michael Haugh. 2017. Joint
fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions. Language &
Communication 1 (55): 10–23.
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking
Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational
Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Heather. 2004. Lift
up your hearts: humor and despair in later life. Journal of Religious
Gerontology 16 (3–4): 29–41.
Vincent, Jocelyne and Michael Castelfranchi. 1981. “On
the art of deception: how to lie while saying the truth”. In: H. Parret, M. Sbisà, J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities
and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on
Pragmatics, Urbino, July8–14, 1979. 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Amsterdam.
Wenger, Etienne. 2001. Communities
of practice a brief introduction. Retrieved from [URL]
Wetherell, Margaret. 2013. Affect
and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive
practice. Subjectivity 6 (4): 349–368.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo & Heith Copes
2024. Identitas per Fabulam: Joint Fantasising in the Construction of Criminal Group Identities. Critical Criminology
2022. Melita, domi adsum: Sessismo e eteronormatività nelle narrative enogastronomiche italiane. Italian Culture 40:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo
2023. Non serviam: Narrative dimensions of organized crime resistance and susceptibility. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 75 ► pp. 100627 ff.
Poppi, Fabio Indìo Massimo
2024. Per imaginem ad Veritatem: joint fantasizing of crime. Criminal Justice Studies 37:2 ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.