Article published in:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:1 (2022) ► pp. 107125
Antaki, Charles, and Mick Finlay
2013 “Trust in What Others Mean: Breakdowns in Interaction Between Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Support Staff.” In Discourses of Trust, ed. by Christopher Candlin, and Jonathan Chricton, 21–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, W. L. Mick Finlay, Chris Walton, and Louise Pate
2008 “Offering Choices to People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Interactional Study.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52 (12): 1165–1175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arminen, Ilkka
2005Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Bayles, Kathryn, and Cheryl K. Tomoeda
(eds.) 2007Cognitive-Communication Disorders of Dementia. San Diego, Calif.: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, and Jane Maxim
2001 “Context as a Resource for The Constructions of Turns at Talk in Aphasia.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 15(1–2): 79–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, German. E.
1998 “Confabulations: A Conceptual History.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 71: 225–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, Lisa, and Rochelle E. Cox
2009 “Faultless” Ignorance: Strengths and Limitations of Epistemic Definitions of Confabulation.” Consciousness and Cognition 181: 952–965. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Charles
1967 [1909] “The Social Self.” In Theories of Society. Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory Vol. 2, ed. by Talcott Parsons, Edward Shils, and Kaspar D. Naegele, 822–828. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1997 “Po-faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics 25 (1): 219–253.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Language Use in Institutional and Work-Place Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile
1982 [1895]The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Maria and Arnulf Deppermann
2012Hearing Aids Communication. Integrating Social Interaction, Audiology and User Centered Design to Improve Communication with Hearing Loss and Hearing Technologies. Mannheim: Verlag fur Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Katie, Louise Hickson, and Caitlin Grenness
2017 “Conversation Breakdown in the Audiology Clinic: The Importance of Mutual Gaze”. International Journal of Communication and Language Disorders 52 (3) 346–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1963 “A Conception of and Experiments with ‘Trust’ as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions”. In Motivation and Social Interaction: Cognitive Determinants, ed. by O. J. Harvey, 187–238. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
2006Seeing Sociologically. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
2008Toward a Sociological Theory of Information (edited and introduced by Anne Warfield Rawls). Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1995 “Co-constructing Meaning in Conversation with an Aphasic Man.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 233–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2003Conversation and Brain Damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 183–98. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guendouzi, Jacqueline, and Nicole Müller
(eds.) 2006Approaches to Discourse in Dementia. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1997Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analysing Data. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. by David Silverman, 161–182. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, William
1952 [1891]The Principles of Psychology (Great Books of the Western World 53). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
Jansson, Gunilla and Charlotta Plejert
2014 “Taking a Shower: Managing a Potentially Imposing Activity in Dementia Care.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 5(1): 27–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Danielle
2013 “A Family Living with Alzheimer’s Disease: The Communicative Challenges.” Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice 14 (5): 555–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann M. Kring, Randall. C. Young, and Erin A. Heerey
2001 “Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 1271: 229–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurhila, Salla
2006Second Language Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kurhila, Salla, and Minna Laakso
2016 ”Puhumisen Haasteet.” [Challenges of Speech]. In Keskustelunanalyysi: Kuinka tutkia sosiaalista toimintaa ja vuorovaikutusta [Conversation Analysis: How to Study Social Action and Interaction], ed. by Melisa Stevanovic, and Camilla Lindholm, 224–242. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Laakso, Minna
1997Self-initiated Repair by Fluent Aphasic Speakers in Conversation. Studia Fennica Linguistica 81. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2012 “Aphasia as an Example of How a Communication Disorder Affects Interaction.” In Hearing Aids Communication, ed. by Maria Egbert and Arnulf Deppermann, 138–145. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Lind, Christopher, Louise Hickson, and Norman P. Erber
2004 “Conversation Repair and Acquired Hearing Impairment: A Preliminary Quantitative Clinical Study”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology 26 (1), 40–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, Camilla
2008 “Laughter, Communication Problems and Dementia.” Communication & Medicine 5 (1): 3–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Parallel Realities: The Interactional Management of Confabulation in Dementia Care Encounters.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (2): 176–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, Camilla, and Alison Wray
2011Proverbs and Formulaic Sequences in the Language of Elderly People with Dementia. Dementia 10 (4): 604–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, Camilla
2016 “Luottamuksen haasteet.” [Challenges of trust.] In Keskustelunanalyysi. Kuinka tutkia sosiaalista toimintaa ja vuorovaikutusta [Conversation analysis. How to Study Social Action and Interaction], ed. by Melisa Stevanovic and Camilla Lindholm. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
1998Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matikka, Leena M., and Hannu T. Vesala
1997 ”Acquiescence in Quality-of-life Interviews with Adults Who Have Mental Retardation.” Mental Retardation 351: 75–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
2005 “Social Actions, Gestalt Coherence, and Designations of Disability: Lessons From and About Autism.” Social Problems 521: 499–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George. H.
1950 [1934]Mind, Self, and Society from a Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mikesell, Lisa
2009 “Conversational Practices of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and His Interlocutors.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 135–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(3): 201–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.) 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pajo, Kati
2013 “The Occurrence of ‘What’, ‘Where’, ‘What House’ and Other Repair Initiations in the Home Environment of Hearing-Impaired Individuals”. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 48 (1): 66–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plejert, Charlotta, Camilla Lindholm, and Robert W. Schrauf
(eds.) 2017Multilingual Interaction and Dementia. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, Elisabeth Muth Andersen, and Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
(eds.) 2019Professional Interactional Practices in Dementia Care. Special issue of Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 1/2019 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen, and Elisabeth Muth Andersen
2019 “Working out availability, unavailability and awayness in social face-to-face encounters: The case of dementia”. Discourse Studies 21(3): 258–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Holly D., and Heather H. Keller
2009 “Mealtimes in Nursing Homes: Striving for Person-centered Care.” Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly 28 (4): 327–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Maartje
2007 “Nothing but the Truth? On Truth and Deception in Dementia Care”. Bioethics 21 (1), 13–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schnider, Armin
2008The Confabulating Mind: How the Brain Creates Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thom
2015Speaking our minds: Why Human Communication is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make it Special. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Pamela
1998Aspects of Confused Speech: A Study of Verbal Interaction between Confused and Normal Speakers. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura, and Alessandro Fasulo
2010 “How to Go on: Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in the Communication of a Child with Autism.” Ethos 38 (1): 116–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface Between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (2): 185–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Sonja Koski, Mikko Kahri, Liisa Voutilainen, Emmi Koskinen, Taina Nieminen-von Wendt, Pekka Tani, Elina Sihvola, and Anssi Peräkylä
2017 “On the Asperger Experience of Interaction: Interpersonal Dynamics in Dyadic Conversations.” Journal of Autism 4 (2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Taina Valkeapää, Elina Weiste, and Camilla Lindholm
2018 ”Osallisuus ja yhteinen päätöksenteko mielenterveyskuntoutuksessa.” [Participation and Joint Decision Making in Mental Health Rehabilitation]. Psykologia 05–06/2018: 402–420.Google Scholar
Stribling, Penny, John Rae, and Paul Dickerson
2009 “Using Conversation Analysis to Explore the Recurrence of a Topic in the Talk of a Boy with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. “Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23 (8): 555–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Ray
2019 “Atypical Interaction: Conversation Analysis and Communication Impairments.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(3): 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar