Article published in:
Hate speech: Definitions, interpretations and practices
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider, Sharon Millar and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics and Society 11:2] 2020
► pp. 196218
References
Adelman, Howard
2008 “Theories of Genocide: The Case of Rwanda.” In Explaining the Breakdown of Ethnic Relations: Why Neighbours Kill, ed. by Victoria Esses, and Richard A. Vernon. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon W.
1954The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Angermuller, Johannes
2018 “Truth after Post-truth: For a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies.” Palgrave Communications 4 (30): 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne
2013 “The Saliency Hypothesis: Affects and Emotions.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 7–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017 “Thinking globally, acting locally: Mainstream supremacist concepts within a local socio-historical context.” Journal of Aggression Language and Conflict 5 (2): 178–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Le discours de haine dissimulée: le mépris pour humilier.” Déviance et société 3 (43): 359–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, and Monika Kopytowska
2017 “Conceptualising the Other: Online Discourses on the Current Refugee Crisis in Cyprus and in Poland.” Łódź Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 203–233.Google Scholar
Braddock, Kurth, and John Horgan
2015 “Towards a Guide for Constructing and Disseminating Counter-narratives to Reduce Support for Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39 (5): 381–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braddock, Kurth, and James Price Dillard
2016 “Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors.” Communication Monographs 83 (4): 446–467, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn
1999 “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?Journal of Social Issues 5531: 429–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alexander
2015Hate Speech Law: A Philosophical Examination. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “What is so special about online (as compared to offline) hate speech?Ethnicities 18 (3): 297–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborti, Neil
2015 “Re-thinking Hate Crime: Fresh Challenges for Policy and Practice.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30 (10): 1738–1754. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Justin, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec
2017 “Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1217–1230. New York: ACM. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiluwa, Innocent
2015 “Radicalist Discourse: A Study of the Stances of Nigeria’s Boko Haram and Somalia’s Al Shabaab on Twitter.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 214–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Citron, Danielle Keats
2014Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Almagor, Raphael
2015Confronting the Internet’s Dark Side: Moral and Social Responsibility on the Free Highway. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Why confronting the Internet’s dark side?Philosophia 451: 919–929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colomb, Gregory C., and Joyce A. Simutis
1996 “Visible Conversation and Academic Inquiry: CMC in a Cultural Diverse Classroom.” In Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Suzan C. Herring, 203–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union
2008 Council framework decision 2008/913/jha of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law. https://​eur​-lex​.europa​.eu​/legal​-content​/EN​/TXT​/?uri​=celex:32008F0913
De Smedt, Tom, Guy De Pauw, and Pieter Van Ostaeyen
2018 “Automatic Detection of Online Jihadist Hate Speech.” CLiPS Technical Report Series 71: 1–31. https://​arxiv​.org​/ftp​/arxiv​/papers​/1803​/1803​.04596​.pdf
Dubrovsky, Vitaly J., Sara Kiesler, and Beheruz N. Sethna
1991 “The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-mediated and Face-to-face Decision Making Groups.” Human-Computer Interaction 6 (2): 119–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ess, Charles, and Fay Sudweeks
2006 “Culture and Computer-mediated Communication: Toward New Understandings.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 111: 179–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gadd, David
2009 “Aggravating Racism and Elusive Motivation.” British Journal of Criminology 491: 755–771. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardone, Iginio, Alisha Patel, and Matti Pohjonen
2014Mapping and Analysing Hate Speech Online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garland, Jon
2010 “Victimization of Goths and the Boundaries of Hate Crime.” In From Hate Crime: Concepts, Policy, Future Directions, ed. by Neil Chakraborti, 40–57. London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Garland, Jon, and Neil Chakraborti
2012 “Divided by a common concept? Assessing the implications of different conceptualizations of hate crime in the European Union.” European Journal of Criminology 9 (1): 38–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fein, Helen
1979Accounting for Genocide. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1993Genocide: A Sociological Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fortuna, Paula
2017 “Automatic Detection of Hate Speech in Text: An Overview of the Topic and Dataset Annotation with Hierarchical Classes.” Master’s thesis, University of Porto. https://​sigarra​.up​.pt​/flup​/en​/pub​_geral​.show​_file​?pi​_gdoc​_id​=990883
Hansen, Miriam, Sabine Fabriz, and Sebastian Stehle
2015 “Cultural Cues in Students’ Computer-mediated Communication: Influences on E-mail Style, Perception of the Sender, and Willingness to help.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 201: 278–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Miriam, and Regina Jucks
2014 “Computer-mediated Communication in Psychology Teaching: Influence of Culture on E-mail Content and on Appraisal.” Psychology Learning and Teaching 131: 218–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardacker, Claire
2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan, Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab
2002 “Searching for Safety Online: Managing ‘Trolling’ in a Feminist Forum.” Information Society 1851: 371–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iganski, Paul
2018Hate Crime. The Need to Strengthen ‘Civil Courage.’ Belfast: NIACRO.Google Scholar
Jane, Emma A.
2014 “ ‘Your a Ugly, Whorish, Slut’: Understanding E-bile.” Feminist Media Studies 1441: 531–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kakava, Christina
2001 “Language and Conflict.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi Hamilton, 650–670. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, Jane Seigel, and Timothy McGuire
1984 “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication.” American Psychologist 39 (10): 1123–1134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, David Zubrow, Anne Marie Moses, and Valerie Geller
1985 “Affect in Computer-mediated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion.” Human Computer Interaction 11: 77–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae
2018 “The Authority of Hate Speech.” Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, 31, ed. by John Gardner, Leslie Green, and Brian Leiter, 123–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M.
1999Punishing Hate: Bias Crimes under American Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, Martin, Tim O’Shea, Pat Fung, and Russell Spears
1992 “Flaming in Computer-mediated Communication: Observations, Explanations, Implications.” In Contexts of Computer Mediated Communication, ed. by Martin Lea, 89–112. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lea, Martin, Russell Spears, and Daphne De Groot
2001 “Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Behavior 27 (5): 526–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leets, Laura
2002 “Experiencing Hate Speech: Perceptions and Responses to Anti-semitism and Antigay Speech.” Journal of Social Issues 58 (2): 341–361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
2017 “Incivility and Confrontation in Online Conflict Discourses”. Łódź Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 347–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillian, Donna
2007 “A Thorn by any Other Name: Sexist Discourse as Hate Speech.” Discourse and Society 1861: 719–740. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ludz, Peter C.
1976 “Alienation as a Concept in the Social Sciences.” In Theories of Alienation, ed. by R. Felix Geyer and David R. Schweitzer, 3–37. Leiden: H.E. Stenfert Kroese. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari
1989 “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story.” Michigan Law Review 87 (8): 2320–2381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei
2008 “The Pragmatics of Legal Language. ” Ratio Juris 21 (4): 423–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Mary-Kate
2009 “Oppressive Speech.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3): 389–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Naomi B., and John W. McCormick
1992 “Computer Friends and Foes: Content of Undergraduates’ Electronic Mail”. Computers in Human Behavior 81: 379–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukimbiri, Jean
2005 “The Seven Stages of the Rwandan Genocide.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 31: 823–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2007 “Which Role do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? The function of anti-Semitic imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf.’” Patterns of Prejudice 41 (1): 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Frances
2018 “Pragmatic Interpretation by Judges: Constrained Performatives and the Deployment of Gender Bias.” In The Pragmatic Turn in Law, ed. by Janet Giltrow and Dieter Stein, 205–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, Patrick, and Andrew J. Flanagin
2003 “Reconceptualizing ‘Flaming’ and Other Problematic Messages.” New Media and Society 511: 69–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pohjonen, Matti and Sahana Udupa
2017 “Extreme Speech Online: An Anthropological Critique of Hate Speech Debates.” International Journal of Communication 111: 1173–1191.Google Scholar
Postmes, Tom, Russel Spears, and Martin Lea
2000 “The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-mediated Communication.” Human Communication Research 26 (3): 341–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson-Self, Louise
2018 “Woman-hating: On Misogyny, Sexism, and Hate speech.” Hypatia 33 (2): 256–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roulstone, Alan, Pam Thomas, and Susie Balderston
2011 “Between hate and vulnerability: Unpacking the British criminal justice system’s construction of disablist hate crime.” Disability and Society 26(3): 351–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1791–1814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William
2000 “Hate Speech in Rwanda: The Road to Genocide.” McGill Law Journal 461: 141–171.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Anna, and Michael Wiegand
2017 “A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing.” Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, 1–10, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M. B. W.
1985 “Law and Language: The Role of Pragmatics in Statutory Interpretation.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 461: 373–420.Google Scholar
Thompsen, Philip A.
1996 “What’s Fueling the Flames in Cyberspace: A Social Influence Model.” In Communication and Cyberspace: Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment, ed. by Lance Strate, Ronald Jacobson, and Stephanie B. Gibson, 297–315. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Wibke
2008 “Counteracting Hate Speech as a Way of Preventing Genocidal Violence.” Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 3 (3), Article 8. http://​scholarcommons​.usf​.edu​/gsp​/vol3​/iss3​/8. Crossref
Tsesis, Alexander
2002Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Inflammatory Speech: Offense Versus Incitement.” Minnesota Law Review 971: 101–152.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Waller, James E.
2002Becoming Evil: How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy
2012The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walther, Joseph B., Jeffery F. Anderson, and David W. Park
1994 “Interpersonal Effects in Computer-mediated Communication: A Meta-analysis of Social and Antisocial communication.” Communication Research 2141: 460–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, William, and Julia Hirschberg
2012 “Detecting Hate Speech on the World Wide Web.” In LSM’12: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language in Social Media, 19–26. Stroudsburg, Penn.: ACL.Google Scholar
Weisburd, Steven Bennett, and Brian Levin
1994 “On the Basis of Sex, Recognizing Gender Based Bias Crimes.” Stanford Law and Policy Review 7 (2): 21–47.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1999Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2011Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Ziqi, David Robinson, and Jonathan Tepper
2018 “Detecting Hate Speech on Twitter Using a Convolution-GRU Based Deep Neural Network.” In ESWC 2018: The Semantic Web, ed. by Aldo Gangemi, Roberto Navigli, Maria-Esther Vidal, Pascal Hitzler, Raphaël Troncy, Laura Hollink, Anna Tordai, and Mehwish Alam, 745–760. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Baider, Fabienne
2022. Covert Hate Speech, Conspiracy Theory and Anti-semitism: Linguistic Analysis Versus Legal Judgement. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.