Situated co-operative creativity
A highly important societal aspect of language use are pragmatic creative acts and interactions. The ability to,
through multimodal interaction, create something new, is primordial for human sociality. In this paper, I propose a theoretical
model that enables detailed analysis of situated co-operative creative actions as these naturally emerge in interactional
situations. First, I develop the theoretical model by extrapolating from Charles Goodwin’s theory of co-operative action. I then
illustrate the model through detailed analysis of a single case where participants interact in a video-mediated robotic context.
The model is situated within ethnomethodological multimodal conversation analysis and based on video ethnographic data. This
research contributes to the field of creativity and human pragmatic action by providing an applicable model for Situated
Co-Operative Creativity, the SCOC model, which can be used for detailed analysis of everyday creativity.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Approaches to creativity
- 3.EMCA studies of creativity
- 4.A Goodwinian approach to situated co-operative creativity
- 5.Developing the Situated Co-Operative Creativity (SCOC) model
- 6.Analysis of a single case
- 7.Discussing the analysis in light of the SCOC model
- 8.Conclusion: Potentials and problems regarding the SCOC model
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (64)
Amabile, Teresa M.
1997 “
Motivating Creativity in
Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do.”
California Management
Review 40 (1): 39–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristotle
1924 Metaphysics (Book
IX). Translated by
W. D. Ross.
[URL].
[URL]
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari
2004 A
Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London & New York: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Due, Brian L.
2014 “
The Development of an Idea in a
Context of
Rejection.”
Semiotica 2021: 207–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Due, Brian L.
2016 “
Co-Constructed Imagination
Space: A Multimodal Analysis of the Interactional Accomplishment of Imagination during Idea-Development
Meetings.”
CoDesign 14 (3): 1–17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Due, Brian L., and Johan Trærup
2018 “
Passing
Glasses: Accomplishing Deontic Stance at the Optician.”
Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies
of Human Sociality 1(2).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fagerberg, Jan, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson
2006 The
Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford Handbooks in Business and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2002 The
Way We Think : Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
2003 “
Conceptual
Blending, Form and Meaning.”
Recherches en
Communication 191.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Lawrence R.
2002 New Directions in Group
Communication. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies
in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garfinkel, Harold
1991 “
Respecification:
Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Methods, Etc. in and of the
Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society (I) – an Announcement of
Studies.” In
Ethnomethodology and the Human
Sciences, edited by
Graham Button, 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garfinkel, Harold
1996 “
Ethnomethodology’s
Program.”
Social Psychology
Quarterly 59 (1): 5–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey L. Sacks
1970 “
On
Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” In
J. C. McKinney &
E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.):
Theoretical
Sociology, 338–66. New York: Appleton Century Croft.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glăveanu, Vlad Petre, Alex Gillespie, and Jaan Valsiner
2014 Rethinking
Creativity: Contributions from Social and Cultural
Psychology. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glăveanu, Vlad Petre, Lene Tanggaard Pedersen, and Charlotte Wegener
2016 Creativity –
A New
Vocabulary. Berlin: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glăveanu, Vlad Petre, and Lene Tanggaard
2014 “
Creativity,
Identity, and Representation: Towards a Socio-Cultural Theory of Creative Identity.”
New Ideas
in
Psychology 341 (
August): 12–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “
Action
and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2013 “
The
Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 46(1): 8–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2017 Co-Operative
Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2018 “
Why
Multimodality? Why Co-Operative Action?”
Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human
Sociality 1 (2).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hallam, Elizabeth, and Tim Ingold
eds. 2008 Creativity
and Cultural Improvisation. New York: Berg Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harmsen, Jan, André B. de Haan, and Pieter L. J. Swinkels
2018 Product
and Process Design: Driving Innovation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heinemann, Trine, Jeanette Landgrebe, and Ben Matthews
2012 “
Collaborating
to Restrict: A Conversation Analytic Perspective on Collaboration in
Design.”
CoDesign 8 (4): 200–214.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel
and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hougaard, Anders
2005 “
Conceptual
Disintegration and Blending in Interactional Sequences: A Discussion of New Phenomena, Processes vs. Products, and
Methodology.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 37 (10): 1653–85.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, Edwin
2005 “
Material
Anchors for Conceptual Blends.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 37 (10): 1555–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, Edwin
2006 “
The
Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction.” In
N. J. Enfield &
S. C. Levinson (Eds.),
Roots
of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. New York: Berg Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joas, Hans
1997 The
Creativity of Action. Translated by
Jeremy Gaines and
Paul Keast. (1st
edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joas, Hans, and Wolfgang Knöbl
2009 Social
Theory, Twenty Introductory
Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koestler, Arthur
1964 The
Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koestler, Arthur
1981 “
The
Three Domains of Creativity.” In
Denis Dutton and
Michael Krausz, eds.,
The
Concept of Creativity in Science and
Arts, Vol. 61. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landgrebe, Jeanette, and Trine Heinemann
Levinson, Stephen C.
1992 “
Activity Types and
Language.” In
Paul Drew &
John Heritage (Eds.):
Talk
at Work. Interaction in Institutional
Settings, 66–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, Ben
2009 “
Intersections
of Brainstorming Rules and Social
Order.”
CoDesign 5 (1): 65–76.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mead, George H.
1934 Mind, Self, and Society: From the
Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mednick, Sarnoff A.
1965 The Associative Basis of the Creative
Process. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
2002 Phenomenology
of Perception. London & New York: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “
The
Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 651: 137–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mumford, Michael D.
2003 “
Where Have We Been, Where Are
We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research.”
Creativity Research
Journal 15 (2/3): 107.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, Keith M.
2005 “
Collaborative Imagining: The
Interactive Use of Gestures, Talk, and Graphic Representation in Architectural
Practice.”
Semiotica 2005 (156): 113–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nielsen, Mie Femø
2012 “
Using Artifacts in
Brainstorming Sessions to Secure Participation and Decouple Sequentiality.”
Discourse
Studies 14 (1): 87–109.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OED
2019 “
Create | Origin and
Meaning of Create by Online Etymology Dictionary”.
[URL]
Osborn, Alex F.
1953 Applied Imagination: Principles and
Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving. New York: Scribner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philipsen, Johanne S., and Lasse Vôge Jensen
2018 “
‘How
Do Signs Come to Mean?’ – Reflections on the Goodwinian Interactional Approach to Empirical Investigations of the Human
Semiotic Ecology.” In
Co-Operative Engagements of Intertwined
Semiosis. Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, edited by
Donald Favareau, 301–5. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rawls, Anne Warfield
2008 “
Harold Garfinkel,
Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies.”
Organization
Studies 29 (5): 701–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey L.
1992 Lectures on Conversation (With an
Introduction by Emanuel A.
Schegloff). Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey L., Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “
A
Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for
Conversation.”
Language 50 (4): 696–735.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salas, Eduardo, Michael A. Rosen, Shawn C. Burke, and Gerald F. Goodwin
2009 “
The
Wisdom of Collectives in Organizations: An Update of the Teamwork
Competencies.” In
E. Salas,
G. F. Goodwin,
C. S. Burke (Eds.)
Team
Effectiveness in Complex Organizations. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and
Approaches, 39–83. New York: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sawyer, Keith
2011 “
The
Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity: A Critical Review.”
Creativity Research
Journal 23 (2): 137–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schuldberg, David
1999 “
Chaos
Theory and Creativity.” In
M. Runco &
S. Pritzker (Eds.),
Encyclopedia
of Creativity, Vol. 1, 259–72. New York: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schumpeter, Joseph
1934 The
Theory of Economic Development. (reproduced New York
1961). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simonton, Dean Keith
1999 “
Creativity from a
Historiometric Perspective.” In
Robert J. Sternberg (Ed.)
Handbook
of
Creativity, 116–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stacey, Ralph D.
1996 Complexity and Creativity in
Organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sternberg, Robert J.
2000 Handbook of
Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron
2011 Embodied
Interaction: Language and Body in the Material
World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanggaard, Lene
2013a “
A
Situated Model of Creative Learning – Keynote at EERA, Istanbul.”
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanggaard, Lene
2013b “
The
Sociomateriality of Creativity in Everyday Life.”
Culture &
Psychology 19 (1): 20–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanggaard, Lene
2014 “
A
Situated Model of Creative Learning.”
European Educational Research
Journal 13 (1): 107–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, Mark
ed. 2006 The
Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. (1st
edition). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, Roy
1981 The
Invention of Culture. Revised
edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whitehead, Alfred North
1979 Process and
Reality. Ed. by
David Ray Griffin and
Donald W. Sherburne. 2nd Revised edition
edition. New York & London: Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittenbaum, Gwen M., Andrea B. Hollingshead, Poul B. Paulus, Randy Y. Hirokawa, Deborah G. Ancona, Randall S. Peterson, Karen A. Jehn, and Kay Yoon
2004 “
The
Functional Perspective as a Lens for Understanding Groups.”
Small Group
Research 35 (1): 17–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Seuren, Lucas M., Sakari Ilomäki, Evi Dalmaijer, Sara E. Shaw & Wyke J. P. Stommel
2024.
Communication in Telehealth: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 57:1
► pp. 73 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Due, Brian L
2023.
Situated socio-material assemblages: assemmethodology in the making.
Human Communication Research 50:1
► pp. 123 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.