Identity gatekeeping in New Work Order organizations
Quality care discussions during performance appraisal interviews
While much has been written on the transition of organizational life into the New Work Order (NWO) and the effects
this has had on employees in language-centered economic spaces, few studies have attempted to tease out how these NWO-expectations
have affected less language-centered workplaces. In this article, I focus on such a workplace, namely a medical lab, and I tease
out processes of what I call ‘identity gatekeeping’. With this term I refer to the fact that NWO-employees are expected to be
knowledge-workers whose identities need to be aligned with organizational expectations. As such, these identities become a crucial
object of intra-organizational gatekeeping. Focusing on three performance appraisal interviews and using a social-realist
discourse-analytical approach, I demonstrate how the superior’s interactional identity negotiations either mold or silence
dissident identities depending on the employee’s future professional aspirations. Finally, the implications of these interactional
negotiation processes for NWO-ways of working are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Performance appraisal interviews
- 3.Method
- 4.Data
- 5.Analyses
- 5.1A model employee
- 5.2Silencing the ‘assembly line’-employee
- 5.3‘Creative employee’ identity molding
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (41)
References
Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 2002. “Identity
regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual.” Journal of
Management
Studies 39 (5): 619–644. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asmuß, Birte. 2008. “Performance
appraisal interviews: Preference Organization in assessment sequences.” Journal of Business
Communication 45 (4): 408–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity
and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse
Studies 7 (4–5):585–614. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buttny, Richard. 1997. “Reported
Speech in Talking Race on Campus.” Human Communication
Research 23 (4): 477–506. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buttny, Richard. 2001. “Therapeutic
humor in retelling the clients’
tellings.” Text 21 (3):303–327.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, Deborah. 2000. Good
to talk: Living and working in a communication
culture. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clifton, Jonathan. 2012. “Conversation
Analysis in Dialogue With Stocks of Interactional Knowledge: Facework and Appraisal
Interviews.” Journal of Business
Communication 49 (4): 283–311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erickson, Frederick. 2011. “The
gatekeeping encounter as a social form and as a site for face
work.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and
Professions, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 433–454. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fletcher, Clive. 2001. “Performance
appraisals and management: The developing research agenda.” Journal of Occupational and
Organisational
Psychology 74 (4): 473–487. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gee, James Paul, Glynda Hull, and Colin Lankshear. 1996. The
New Work Order. London: Saint Leonards Allen and Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Interviewing in intercultural
situations.” In Talk at work – Interaction in institutional
settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 302–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Stuart. 2000. “Who
needs ‘identity’?” In Identity: a reader, ed.
by Paul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heller, Monica. 2010. “The
Commodification of Language.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 39 (1): 101–114. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet. 2005. “Leadership
talk: How do leaders ‘do mentoring’, and is gender relevant?” Journal of
Pragmatics 37 (11): 1779–1800. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet. 2007. “Monitoring
organisational boundaries: Diverse discourse strategies used in gatekeeping.” Journal of
Pragmatics 39 (11): 1993–2016. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet. 2018. “Negotiating
the culture order in New Zealand workplaces.” Language in
Society 47 (1): 33–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine. 2011. Leadership,
Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hull, Glynda. 2001. “Constructing
Working Selves: Silicon Valley Assemblers Meet the New Work Order.” Anthropology of Work
Review XXII (1):17–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iedema, Rick. 1999. “Formalizing
Organizational Meaning.” Discourse &
Society 10 (1): 49–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iedema, Rick, and Hermine Scheeres. 2003. “From
doing work to talking work: renegotiating knowing, doing, and identity.” Applied
Linguistics 24 (3):316–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pälli, Pekka, and Esa Lehtinen. 2014. “Making
objectives common in performance appraisal interviews.” Language &
Communication 391: 92–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2011. “Validity
in research on naturally occurring interaction.” In Qualitative
Research, ed. by David Silverman, 365–382. London, England: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader, and Charles Bosk. 1982. “On
hedging in physician-physician discourse.” In Linguistics and the
Professions, ed. by Robert J. Di Pietro, 83–97. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Celia. 2011. “Gatekeeping
discourse in employment interviews.” In Handbook of Communication in
Organisations and Professions, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 407–432. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A
simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for
conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandlund, Erica, Christina Olin-Scheller, Lina Nyroos, Liselotte Jakobsen, and Cecilia Nahnfeldt. 2011. “The
Performance Appraisal Interview: An Arena for the Reinforcement of Norms for
Employeeship.” Nordic Journal of Working Life
Studies 1 (2): 59–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sarangi, Srikant. 2005. “Social
Interaction, Social Theory and Work-related
Activities.” Calidoscopio 3 (3): 160–169.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts. 1999. “Introduction.” In Talk,
work and institutional order; discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, ed.
by Srikant Sarangi, and Celia Roberts, 61–74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1979. “The relevance of repair to
syntax-for-conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12:
Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 261–286. New York: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scheuer, Jann. 2014. “Managing
employees’ talk about problems in work in performance appraisal interviews.” Discourse
Studies 16 (3): 407–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schnurr, Stephanie, and Angela Chan. 2011. “Exploring
another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in
disagreements.” Language in
Society 40 (2): 187–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2000. “Coercive
accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher
education.” In Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in
accountability, ethics and the academy, ed. by Marilyn Strathern, 57–89. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation
analysis: an introduction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strathern, Marilyn. 1997. “‘Improving
ratings’: audit in the British University system.” European
Review 5 (3): 305–321. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Jonathan Clifton. 2017. “Corporate
settings.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the
Workplace ed. by Bernadette Vine, 127–137. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Stephanie Schnurr. 2014. “Negotiating
meaning and co-constructing institutionalisable answers: Leadership through gate-keeping in performance appraisal
interviews.” Journal of
Pragmatics 671: 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van De Mieroop, Dorien, and Eveline Vrolix. 2014. “A
discourse analytical perspective on the professionalization of the performance appraisal
interview.” International Journal of Business
Communication 51 (2): 159–182. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Yu, Danni & Carla Vergaro
2024.
Regular selves constructed through genres: A socio-cognitive approach to the study of positioning acts in Italian rectors’ inaugural speeches.
Discourse & Society ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.