Cover not available
Article published In:
Polymedia in Interaction
Edited by Jannis Androutsopoulos
[Pragmatics and Society 12:5] 2021
► pp. 805–827

‘I’m not a tech person’

Negotiation of academic personas in polymedia environments

| The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| Hong Kong Metropolitan University
This study contributes to existing research on polymedia by probing into what we call academic polymedia, investigating the constant availability of interpersonal, professional, and social media for constructing scholarly personas. Drawing on the technobiographical narratives of a group of Hong Kong bilingual academics, we analyze academics’ perceptions of their media choices as situated in their professional polymedia environments. In particular, we examine how choices between public and private media shape academic persona development, and the way polymedia engagement impacts the participants’ language choice for academic purposes. This study sheds light on existing research on workplace discourse and identity in sociolinguistics by offering a polymedia dimension that draws on people’s media ideology in developing their professional identities.
Keywords: academic polymedia, digital scholarship, technobiographies, academic personas, language choice
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Academic polymedia and personas
    • 2.1Digital academic personas and the scholarly public
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Context and participants
    • 3.2Technobiographical interviews
    • 3.3Coding and analyzing categories of academic persona
  • 4.Academic polymedia: An overview
  • 5.Academic personas and the construction of polymedia environments
  • 6.Boundary-crossing and language choice in academic polymedia
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 7 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20049.lee
References (52)
References
Anderson, Gina. 2008. “Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university.” Organization 15(2): 251–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. “Languaging when Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context & Media 41: 62–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Stæhr. 2018. “Moving Methods Online.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, ed. by Angela Creese and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Kim, and David Marshall. 2012. “The Academic Online: Constructing Persona through the World Wide Web.” First Monday 17(9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, David, and Carmen Lee. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, David, and Sharon Mcculloch. 2018. “Negotiating Tensions around New Forms of Academic Writing.” Discourse, Context & Media 24(C): 8–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, Marina. 2018. “Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation across Expert Action Games.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 137–170. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
boyd, danah. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chan, David, and William Lo. 2007. “Running Universities as Enterprises: University Governance Changes in Hong Kong.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education: The Search for New University Governance in Asia: Incorporation, Corporatisation and New Restructuring Strategies 27(3): 305–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ching, Cynthia Carter, and Linda Vigdor. 2005. “Technobiographies: Perspectives from Education and the Arts.” Paper presented at the First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois.
Darics, Erika (ed.). 2015. Digital Business Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg (eds.). 2006. Discourse and Identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Paulien Kortekaas, and Jaap W. Ouwerkerk. 1999. “Self-categorisation, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (2–3): 371–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Freund, Katharina, Stephanie Kizimchuk, Jonathan Zapasnik, Katherine Esteves, and Inger Mewburn. 2018. “A Labour of Love: A Critical Examination of the ‘Labour Icebergs’ of Massive Open Online Courses”. In The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education, ed. by Deborah Lupton, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson, 122–139. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henwood, Flis, Helen Kennedy and Nod Miller (eds.). 2001. Cyborg Lives? Women’s Technobiographies. York: Raw Nerve Books.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory. 1987. “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect.” Psychological Review 94(3): 319–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2006. “Workplace narratives, professional identity and relational practice”. In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg, 166–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Philadelphia, Penn.: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Greer C. 2006. “The Discursive Construction of Teacher Identities in a Research Interview”. In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna.De Fina, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg, 213–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Helen. 2003. “Technobiography: Researching Lives, Online and Off.” Biography 26(1): 120–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria, and Anna Mauranen. 2018. “Digital Academic Discourse: Texts and Contexts: Introduction.” Discourse, Context & Media 241: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans J. 2011. “‘Doing Power’ at Work: Responding to Male and Female Management Styles in a Global Business Corporation.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(1): 4–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Carmen. 2014. “Language Choice and Self-presentation in Social Media: The Case of University Students in Hong Kong.” In The Language of Social Media, ed. by Philip Seargeant and Caroline Tagg, 91–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Multilingualism Online. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, Theresa M., and Mary Jane Curry. 2010. Academic Writing in Global Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin, Angel M. Y. 2008. “The Identity Game and Discursive Struggles of Everyday Life: An Introduction”. In Problematizing Identity: Everyday Struggles in Language, Culture, and Education, ed. by Angel M. Y. Lin, 1–10. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ling, Rich, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2016. “Microcoordination 2.0: Social Coordination in the Age of Smartphones and Messaging Apps.” Journal of Communication 66(5): 834–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn. 2015. “Introducing Relational Work in Facebook and Discussion Boards.” Pragmatics 25(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupton, Deborah, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson. 2018. “The Digital Academic: Identities, Contexts and Politics”. In The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education, ed. by Deborah Lupton, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson, 1–19. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luzón, María-José. 2018. “Features of Online ELF in Research Group Blogs Written by Multilingual Scholars.” Discourse, Context & Media 241: 24–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madianou, Mirca. 2014. “Polymedia Communication and Mediatized Migration: An Ethnographic Approach”. In Mediatization of Communication, ed. by Knut Lundby, 323–348. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Ambient Co-presence: Transnational Family Practices in Polymedia Environments.” Global Networks 16(2): 183–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madianou, Mirca and Daniel Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abington, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mahrt, Merja, Katrin Weller and Isabella Peters. 2014. “Twitter in Scholarly Communication. In Twitter and Society, ed. by Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann, 399–410. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Manipuspika, Yana Shanti, Tantri Refa Indhiarti, and Emy Sudarwati. 2019. “Workplace Discourse: Constructing Social Identity of Lecturers Through Whats­App Group.” International Journal of Language and Linguistics 7(1): 13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, P David, Kim Barbour and Chris Moore. 2018. “Academic Persona: The Construction of Online Reputation in the Modern Academy.” In The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education, ed. by Deborah Lupton, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson, 47–62. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2013. “Hybridism, Edutainment, and Doubt: Science Blogging Finding Its Feet.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 12(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mewburn, Inger, and Pat Thomson. 2018. “Towards an Academic Self?: Blogging during the Doctorate.” In The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education, ed. by Deborah Lupton, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson, 20–35. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molesworth, Mike, Richard Scullion, and Elizabeth Nixon (eds.). 2011. The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, Johann W. Unger, Michele Zappavigna, and David Barton. 2014. Researching language and social media: A student guide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi-Xu. 2009. “Reconstructing Eastern Paradigms of Discourse Studies.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 4(1): 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statista. 2019. Penetration Rate of Leading Social Networks in Hong Kong from 2nd Quarter to 3rd Quarter 2018. Retrieved from: [URL]
Stewart, Bonnie. 2018. “Academic Twitter and Academic Capital: Collapsing Orality and Literacy in Scholarly Publics.” The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education, ed. by Deborah Lupton, Inger Mewburn, and Pat Thomson, 79–93. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Bob Jessop. 2013. “Competitiveness, the Knowledge-Based Economy and Higher Education.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4(1): 24–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John. 1998. Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. Rhetoric, Knowledge, and Society. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tusting, Karin, Sharon McCulloch, Ibrar Bhatt, Mary Hamilton, and David Barton. 2019. Academics Writing: The Dynamics of Knowledge Creation. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uzum, Baburhan. 2013. “From ‘you’ to ‘we’: A Foreign Language Teacher’s Professional Journey towards Embracing Inclusive Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 331: 69–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weller, Martin. 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “The Digital Scholar Revisited.” The Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Lab 1(2): 52–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesch, Michael. 2009. “Youtube and You: Experiences of Self-awareness in the Context Collapse of the Recording Webcam.” Explorations in Media Ecology 8(2): 19–34.Google Scholar
Woodall, Tony, Alex Hiller, and Sheilagh Resnick. 2014. “Making Sense of Higher Education: Students as Consumers and the Value of the University Experience.” Studies in Higher Education 39(1): 48–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Thyness, Hilde & Kristin Vold Lexander
2023. Indexing the ‘included’ migrant? Social categorization and interpersonal digital interaction between labor migrants, teachers and employers in Norway. Language & Communication 88 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.