Cover not available
Article published In:
Polymedia in Interaction
Edited by Jannis Androutsopoulos
[Pragmatics and Society 12:5] 2021
► pp. 756–781

The metapragmatics of mode choice

| University of Copenhagen
| University of Copenhagen

In this article, we investigate the use of social media in contemporary family interaction from a linguistic ethnographic perspective. Inspired by Auer’s (1998) work on code-switching in conversation, we study how family members choose and sometimes alternate between digitally mediated and face-to-face modes of communication in various family settings. Based on ethnographic observations, the participants’ metapragmatic reflections, and their interactional orientations to mode choices, we show how such choices serve social and metapragmatic functions in the interaction between family members who are present in the same house or even in the same room. Accordingly, we argue in favor of situating peoples’ polymedia repertoires in a broader framework of communicative repertoires.

Keywords: mode choice, multimodality, digitally mediated interaction, social media, family interaction, communicative repertoires, polymedia, linguistic ethnography
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multimodal interaction and polymedia repertoires
  • 3.Mode choice and communicative repertoires
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Mode choice in everyday interaction
    • 5.1Texting at home as a convenient choice
    • 5.2Negotiating norms for at-home texting
  • 6.The metapragmatics of mode choice
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 7 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20050.can
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Stæhr
2018 “Moving Methods Online – Researching Digital Language Practices”. In The Routledge Handbook on Language and Superdiversity, ed. by Angela Creese and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
1988 “A Conversation Analytic Approach to Code-Switching and Transfer”. In Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Monica Heller, 187–213. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “The Pragmatics of Code-Switching. A Sequential Approach”. In One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-Switching, ed. by Lesley Milroy and Peter Muysken, 115–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1998 Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, Lynn S.
2013 The Parent App. Understanding Families in the Digital Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copland, Fiona, and Angela Creese
2015 Linguistic Ethnography. Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drotner, Kirsten
1999 “Dangerous Media? Panic Discourses and Dilemmas of Modernity”. Paedagogica Historica 35(3): 593–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gershon, Ilana
2010 “Media Ideologies: An Introduction”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 201: 283–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 “On Face-Work: Psychiatry”. Journal of Interpersonal Relations 181: 213–231.Google Scholar
1963 Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1971 Relations in Public: Micro-studies of the Public Order. London: Allen Lane, the Penguin Press.Google Scholar
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Asta Cekaite
2018 Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Activity. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2001 “Technologies, Text and Affordances”. Sociology 35 (2): 441–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
(ed.) 2009 The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2009 “Technology and Sites of Display”. In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 114–126. London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney. H., Alice Chik, and Christoph A. Hafner
(eds.) 2015 Discourse and Digital Practices. Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Kristian M.
2016 “The Media Go-along. Researching Mobilities with Media at Hand”. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 601: 32–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2010 Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ling, Rich, and Jonathan Donner
2009 Mobile communications. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
2012 Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian M.
forthc. “Media panic, medical discourse and the smart phone”. In: Spaces of upset in the Nordic region: Sociolinguistics beyond cohesion and consensus in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.
Makoni, Sinfree, and Alastair Pennycook
2006 “Disinventing and reconstituting languages”. In: Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages, ed. by Sinfree Makoni and Alastair Pennycook, 1–41. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, Kristine K., and N. N. Brotherton
2020 “Faces in Snapchat. Selfies and social media aesthetics”. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, # 266. London: King’s College London.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2013 “What is a Mode? Smell, Olfactory Perception, and the Notion of Mode in Multimodal Mediated Theory”. Multimodal Communication 2(2): 155–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben
1995 Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben, Karen Tusting, Jannet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese, and Vally Lytra
2004 UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Paper published at [URL]
Rampton, Ben, and Louise Eley
2018 “Goffman and the Everyday Interactional Grounding of Surveillance”. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, # 246. King’s College London.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description”. In Meaning in anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1985 “Language and the Culture of Gender”. In Semiotic mediation, ed. by Elizabeth Mertz and Rick Parmentier, 219–259. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function”. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2013 “The Medium is the Meta-Message”. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen and Anna M. Trester, 99–117. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar