Article in:
The Discourse of Terrorism
Edited by Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio and Juan-Luis Castro-Peña
[Pragmatics and Society 13:3] 2022
► pp. 431–452

“They fabricated lies against us and described us in the harshest of ways”

An analysis of the transitivity patterns used in the online magazine DABIQ

| Simon Fraser University
Over the past decade, Islamic State (ISIS) has made numerous attempts to propagate their beliefs on a global scale via a range of social media platforms (e.g. Twitter), enabling them to reach an extensive audience within a very short time span; when successful, people enlist as supporters of their ideas and, essentially, become radicalised. ISIS also achieve this through publishing propaganda materials, such as the two online magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah (Heidarysafa et al. 2019). In this paper, our focus lies with the former. Through a transitivity analysis of three issues from Dabiq, this paper explores how the in-group (the believers) and the Other (the non-believers) are represented in the magazine. The transitivity framework is useful here because it exposes the linguistic choices that people make and, in turn, reveals how they perceive their world. To retrieve both quantitative and qualitative findings, the UAM Corpus Tool (O’Donnell 2016) is employed.
Keywords: CDA, corpus linguistics, Dabiq, ideology, systemic functional linguistics, transitivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Relevant studies
  • 3.Theoretical background
    • 3.1Critical discourse analysis (CDA)
    • 3.2Transitivity
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Method
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1How are ISIS, their values and the Other (i.e. the non-supporters of ISIS) portrayed in the discourse of Dabiq? Are positive and/or negative associations encountered specifically with the in-group (i.e. ISIS) or the out-group (i.e. the non-believers)?
    • 5.2Is there any evidence of changes across time in terms of how the authors of Dabiq represent ISIS and the Other?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Awan, Imran
2017 “Cyber-extremism: Isis and the Power of Social Media”. Social Science and Public Policy 541: 138–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul and Rachelle Vessey
2018 A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3 (1): 255–278.Google Scholar
Bartley, Leanne
2017  transitivity, No Stone Left Unturned: Introducing Flexibility and Granularity into the Framework for the Analysis of Courtroom Discourse. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Granada. https://​digibug​.ugr​.es​/handle​/10481​/48043
Bhatia, Aditi
2009 “The Discourses of Terrorism.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2): 279–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, Gavin and Tony McEnery
2020 “Correlation, Collocation and Cohesion: A Corpus-Based Critical Analysis of Violent Jihadist Discourse.” Discourse & Society 31 (4): 351–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cottee, Simon and Keith Hayward
2011 “Terrorist (E)motives: The Existential Attractions of Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32 (12): 963–986. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha
2011 “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Political Psychology 21 (2): 405–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In Discourse as Social Interaction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P.
1987 “The Semantics of Clause and Verb for Relational Processes in English.” In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol 1: Theory and Description, Michael A. K. Halliday and Robin P. Fawcett (eds), 130–183. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise
2013 Analysing English Grammar: A Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gambhir, Harleen
2014 “Dabiq: the Strategic Messaging of the Islamic State”. Institute for the Study of War. http://​www​.understandingwar​.org​/sites​/default​/files​/Dabiq%20Backgrounder​_Harleen%20Final​.pdf
Georges, Amaryllis Maria
2016 “ISIS Rhetoric for the Creation of the Ummah.” In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies, Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo, Omondi Oketch and Asiru Hameed Tunde (eds), 178–198. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
1995 “‘Only Connect. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics’.” Unit for Computer Research on the English Language Technical Papers 6. Lancaster University. http://​www​.comp​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/computing​/research​/ucrel​/papers​/techpaper​/vol6​.pdf
Heidarysafa, Mojtaba, Kamran Kowsari, Tolu Odukoya, Philip Potter, Laura E. Barnes, and Donald E. Brown
2019 Women in ISIS Propaganda: A Natural Language Processing Analysis of Topics and Emotions in a Comparison with Mainstream Religious Group. https://​arxiv​.org​/abs​/1912​.03804v1
Holbrook, Donald
2014 The Al-Qaeda Doctrine. The Framing and Evolution of the Leadership’s Public Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ingram, Haroro J.
2016 “An Analysis of Islamic State’s Dabiq Magazine.” Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 458–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 An analysis of Inspire and Dabiq: Lessons from AQAP and Islamic State’s propaganda war. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 40 (5): 357–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinsel and Luke Walker
2018 “Representing the West and “Non-Believers” in the Online Jihadist Magazines Dabiq and Inspire.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 11 (3): 521–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Stuart
2017 “Radicalisers as Regulators: An Examination of Dabiq Magazine”. In Terrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri (eds), 146–157. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Stuart and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2019 “Visual Jihad: Constructing the ‘Good Muslim’ in Online Jihadist Magazines.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milton, Daniel
2016 “Communication Breakdown: Unraveling the Islamic State’s Media’s Efforts.” Combating Terrorism Centre at West Point. https://​www​.stratcomcoe​.org​/milton​-d​-communication​-breakdown​-unraveling​-islamic​-states​-media​-efforts
Musial, Julia
2017 “’My Muslim Sister, Indeed You Are a Mujahidah’ – Narratives in the Propaganda of the Islamic State to Address and Radicalize Western Women. An Exemplary Analysis of the Online Magazine Dabiq.” Journal for Deradicalization 91: 39–100.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hanh Thu
2012 Transitivity Analysis of “Heroic Mother” by Hoa Pham. International Journal of English Linguistics 2 (4): 85–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oddo, John
2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse & Society 22 (3): 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
2016 The UAM Corpus Tool (Version 3.3). http://​www​.corpustool​.com
Romero-Trillo, Jesús, and Cristina Mayor-Goicoechea
2020 “’They Cowardly Attack US, So We Nobly Eliminate Them…’ The Emergence of the Translocal Group in the Propaganda of the Islamic State.” Pragmatics and Society 11 (2): 292–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, Philippe-Joseph
2017 Words are Weapons: Inside ISIS’s Rhetoric of Terror. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Strnad, Vladislav and Nik Hynek
2020 “ISIS’s Hybrid Identity: A Triangulated Analysis of the Dabiq Narrative.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 82–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Sabine, Kay L. O’Halloran, Peter Wignell, Kevin Chai and Rebecca Lange
2018 “A Multimodal Mixed Methods Approach for Examining Recontextualisation Patterns of Violent Extremist Images in Online Media.” Discourse, Context & Media 211: 18–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17 (2): 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vergani, Matteo and Ana-Maria Bliuc
2015 “The Evolution of the ISIS’ Language: A Quantitative Analysis of the Language of the First Year of Dabiq Magazine.” Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Società 21: 7–20.Google Scholar
Watkins, Amy-Louise and Sean Looney
2019 “’The Lions of Tomorrow’: A News Value Analysis of Child Images in Jihadi Magazines.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 42 (1–2): 120–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, Kay L. O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange
2017 “A Mixed Methods Empirical Examination of Changes in Emphasis and Style in the Extremist Magazines Dabiq and Rumiyah .” Perspectives on Terrorism 11 (2): 2–20.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015 The Politics of Fear. What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar