The ideological discourse of Jihadist groups like Al Qaeda or Islamic State is largely built on the use of persuasive techniques which act as instruments for radicalisation and recruitment, and more generally, “convince the audience of the veracity of the doctrine presented” (Adam 2017: 5). This article explores the use of metaphor as an important rhetorical and ideological dimension to jihadist texts. Current findings suggest that religious writings often make use of rich conceptual metaphors to convey distinctive ideological perspectives (Prentice, Rayson and Taylor 2012), for instance, the well-known journey conceptual metaphor, with the image schemata of a path, leading towards a better life, reward in an afterlife, moral choice, hope, and a closeness to God (Jäkel 2002). Specifically, the research adopts a Critical Metaphor Analysis framework (Charteris-Black 2004), which combines Corpus Linguistics with Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. The data for this study is taken from a collection of jihadist online magazines. The corpus has been compared against the Qur’an in order to ascertain whether jihadist propaganda writers are inspired by conventional religious tropes as a way of giving authority to their doctrines. The results show that religiously inspired concepts do indeed help the writers to anchor their message to a deeply seated and authoritative set of ideologies. At the same time, semantic and pragmatic differences in the use of these metaphors suggest an ability to manipulate pre-existing conceptualisations in order to fulfil the communicative needs of the writers, i.e. to embody the principles of jihadism. The findings presented here focus on the following domains: religion as a journey; light as good; heat as fighting; and spirituality as nature.
Adam, Martin. 2017. Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction 10(2): 5–25.
Aggarwal, Neil Krishan. 2019. Media Persuasion in the Islamic State. New York: Columbia University Press.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery. 2012. Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics 34(3): 255–278.
Brookes, Gavin and Tony McEnery. 2020. Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse & Society 31(4): 351–373.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Springer.
Conway, Lucian Gideon III, Laura Janelle Gornic, Mandella Chelsea, Paul Burfeind, Andrea Kuenzli, Shannon Houck, and Deven Theresa Fullerton. 2012. Does complex or simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of U.S. Presidential campaigns. Political Psychology 331: 599–618.
Dhiab-Hassan, Azzam, Benítez-Casto, Miguel Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio. 2018. Nutcracker: The JIHAD Corpus. University of Granada.
Dweik, Bader S. and Mariam M. Abu Shakra. 2010. Strategies in Translating Collocations in Religious Texts from Arabic into English. Atlas Global Journal for Studies and Research, Online Submission. Available at: [URL] Last accessed: 31/03/2021.
El-Sharif, Ahmad. 2011. A linguistic study of Islamic religious discourse: Conceptual metaphors in the prophetic tradition (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: [URL] Last accessed: 31/03/2021.
El-Sharif, Ahmad. 2016. A Theoretical Account on the Study of Metaphor in Didactic Discourse. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(2): 100–112.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2): 193–217.
Goatly, Andrew. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
Hegghammer, Thomas (ed.). 2017. Jihadi culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Houck, Shannon C., Meredith A. Repke and Lucian Gideon III Conway. 2017. Understanding what makes terrorist groups’ propaganda effective: an integrative complexity analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 12(2): 105–118.
Jäkel, Olaf. 2002. Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik.de 2(1): 20–42.
Jäkel, Olaf. 2007. How can mortal man understand the road he travels? Prospects and problems of the cognitive approach to religious metaphor. In The Bible Through Metaphor and Translation: A cognitive semantic perspective, Kurt Feyaerts (ed.), 55–86. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Keating, John. and Belén Soria. 2019. Populist metaphorical utterances. In Populist Discourse: Critical Approaches to Contemporary Politics, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio; Miguel-Ángel Benítez-Castro and Francesca De Cesare (eds.), 209–216. London: Routledge.
Knepper, Timothy. 2019. Using the ‘journey metaphor’ to restructure philosophy of religion. Palgrave Communications 5(1): 1–7.
Ladd, Brynn Elaine. 2018. DiCo-Ding Radicalization: An Appraisal Analysis of Radicalized Language Based on the ANCODI Hypothesis. Hempstead L.I., NY: Hofstra University.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science 4(2): 195–208.
Macdonald, Stuart, Nyasha Maravanyiksa, David Nezri, Elliot Parry, and Kate Thomas. 2018. Online jihadist magazines and the “religious terrorism” thesis. Critical Studies on Terrorism 11(3): 537–550.
Malešević, Siniša. 2017. The organisation of military violence in the 21st century. Organization 24(4): 456–474.
Marcellino, William M. Kim Cragin, Joshua Mendelsohn, Andrew Michael Cady, Madeline Magnuson and Kathleen Reedy. 2016. Measuring the Popular Resonance of Daesh’s Propaganda. Journal of Strategic Security 10(1): 32.
Matusitz, Jonathan and James Olufowote. 2016. Visual motifs in Islamist terrorism: Applying conceptual metaphor theory. Journal of Applied Security Research 11 (1): 18–32.
O’Regan, John P. and Anne Betzel. 2016. Critical discourse analysis: a sample study of extremism. In Research Methods in Intercultural Communication, Zhu Hua (ed.), 281–296. London: Blackwell.
Osisanwo, Ayo. 2016. Discursive representation of Boko Haram terrorism in selected Nigerian newspapers. Discourse & Communication 10(4): 341–362.
Ranstorp, Magnus. 1996. Terrorism in the Name of Religion. Journal of International Affairs 50(1): 41–62.
Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd. Available at: [URL] Last accessed: 31/03/2021.
Sedgwick, Mark J.2004. Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suedfeld, Peter and Dennis A. Rank. 1976. Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(2): 169.
Yusof, Sofia Hayati, Fauziah Hassan, Md Salleh Hassan and Mohd Nizam Osman. 2013. The framing of international media on Islam and terrorism. European Scientific Journal 9(8): 104–121.
Zelin, Aaron Y.2015. Picture or it didn’t happen: A snapshot of the Islamic State’s official media output. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4): 85–97.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Matusitz, Jonathan & Doris Wesley
2024. Online Jihadist Magazines. In Jihad in Sub-Saharan Africa, ► pp. 229 ff.
张, 小玲
2024. Conceptual Metaphor Research on COVID-19 from the Perspective of Critical Metaphor Analysis. Modern Linguistics 12:02 ► pp. 1086 ff.
Patterson, Katie J.
2023. Dualisms in Jihad. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.